Previous analyses have indicated strong tendencies for a host Olympic network to favor one’s home nation through enhanced clock-time, highlighting of star athletes from one’s home country, and more nuanced and positive dialogues. Analysis of NBC’s 2012 London Summer Olympic broadcast revealed significant differences between American and non-American athletes. Regarding athletic mentions, American athletes were more likely to be mentioned (55.8%) than all other athletes combined and composed 75% of the most-mentioned athletes within the broadcast. Regarding descriptions ascribed to the Olympians, American athletes were more likely to be depicted using subjective characterizations, disproportionately having their successes attributed to superior composure, commitment, intelligence, and consonance as well as having a greater level of comments pertaining to their modest/introverted nature. Conversely, non-American athletes were more likely to receive success attributions related to their superior experience and failures depicted as a lack of athletic skill—both largely objective measures.
AllportG. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2.
AngeliniJ. R.BillingsA. C.MacArthurP. J. (2012). The nationalistic revolution will be televised: The 2010 Vancouver Olympic games on NBC. International Journal of Sport Communication, 5, 193–209.
3.
AngeliniJ. R.MacArthurP. J.BillingsA. C. (2012). What’s the gendered story? Vancouver’s primetime Olympic glory on NBC. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56, 261–279.
4.
BillingsA. C. (2008). Olympic media: Inside the biggest show on television. London, England: Routledge.
5.
BillingsA. C. (2009). Conveying the Olympic message: NBC producer and sportscaster interviews regarding the role of identity. Journal of Sports Media, 4, 1–23.
6.
BillingsA. C.AngeliniJ. R. (2007). Packaging the games for viewer consumption: Gender, ethnicity, and nationality in NBC’s coverage of the 2004 summer Olympics. Communication Quarterly, 55, 95–111.
7.
BillingsA. C.AngeliniJ. R.WuD. (2011). Nationalistic notions of the superpowers: Comparative analyses of the American and Chinese telecasts in the 2008 Beijing Olympiad. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 55, 251–266.
8.
BillingsA. C.BrownC. L.CroutJ. H.McKennaK. E.RiceB. A.TimanusM. E.ZeiglerJ. (2008). The games through the NBC lens: Gender, ethnic and national equity in the 2006 Torino Winter Olympics. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52, 215–230.
9.
BillingsA. C.EastmanS. T.(2002). Selective representation of gender, ethnicity, and nationality in American television coverage of the 2000 Summer Olympics. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 37, 351–370.
10.
BillingsA. C.EastmanS. T. (2003). Framing identities: Gender, ethnic, and national parity in network announcing of the 2002 Winter Olympics. Journal of Communication, 53, 369–386.
11.
BillingsA. C.MacArthurP. J.LicenS.WuD. (2009). Superpowers on the Olympic basketball court: The United States versus China through four nationalistic lenses. International Journal of Sport Communication, 2, 380–396.
12.
CardiffD.ScannellP. (1987). Broadcasting and national identity. In CurranJ.SmithA.WingateP., (Eds.), Impacts and influences: Essays on media power in the twentieth century (pp. 157–173). London, England: Methuen.
13.
ChisariF. (2002). ‘An armchair seat at the Olympics’: BBC television and the 1968 Mexico City Olympic games. Sports Historian, 22, 1–22.
14.
ChozickA. (2012, September 26). NBC unpacks trove of data from Olympics. The New York Times, p. B3.
15.
CohenB. C. (1963). The press and foreign policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
CohenJ. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41, 687–699.
DyersonM. (2005). Aggressive America: Media nationalism and the ‘war’ over Olympic pictures in sport’s ‘golden age.’The International Journal of the History of Sport, 22, 974–989.
21.
EastmanS. T.BillingsA. C. (1999). Gender parity in the Olympics: Hyping women athletes, favoring men athletes. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 23, 140–170.
22.
EastmanS. T.BrownR. S.KovatchK. J. (1996). The Olympics that got real? Television’s story of Sarajevo. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 20, 366–391.
23.
GamsonW. A. (1989) News as framing: Comments on Graber. The American Behavioral Scientist, 33, 157–161.
IowerthH.JonesC.HardmanC. (2010). Nationalism and Olympism: Towards a normative theory of international sporting representation. Olympika: The International Journal for Olympic Studies, 19, 81–110.
KeysB. (2012). The early cold war Olympics, 1952-1960: Political, economic and human rights dimensions. In LenskiH. J.WaggS. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of Olympic Studies (pp. 72–87). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
35.
KostermanR.FeshbachS. (1989). Toward a measure of patriotic and nationalistic attitudes. Political Psychology, 10, 257–274.
36.
LargeD. C. (2007). Nazi games: The Olympics of 1936. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
37.
LeeJ. W.MaguireJ. (2009). Global festivals through a national prism: The global-national nexus in South Korean media coverage of the 2004 Athens Olympic games. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 44, 5–24.
38.
MacArthurD. R. (1928). Report of the president on the 1928 Olympic Games. Norfolk, VA: MacArthur Memorial Library and Archives.
39.
MacNeilM. (1996). Networks: Producing Olympic ice hockey for a national television audience. Sociology of Sport Journal, 13, 103–124.
40.
MartinS. (2012). Sport Italia: 150 years of disunited Italy?Bulletin of Italian Politics, 4, 49–62.
41.
McCombsM.GhanhemS. I. (2001). The convergence of agenda setting and framing. In ReeseS. D.GandyO. H.GrantA. E. (Eds.), Framing public life (pp. 67–81). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42.
McCombsM.ShawD. (1972).The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176–187.
43.
McCombsM. E.ShawD. L. (2006). The evolution of agenda setting research: Twenty-five years in the marketplace of ideas. Journal of Communication, 43, 58–67.
44.
MilfordM. (2012). The Olympics, Jesse Owens, Burke, and the implications of media framing in symbolic boasting. Mass Communication and Society, 15, 485–505.
45.
MorganW. J. (1995). Cosmopolitanism, Olympism, and nationalism: A critical interpretation of Coubertin's ideal of international sporting life. OLYMPIKA: The International Journal for Olympic Studies, 4, 79–92.
46.
PanagiotopoulouR. (2012). Nation branding and the Olympic games: New media images for Greece and China. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 29, 2337–2348.
47.
PapaF. (2010). France: The Beijing Olympics 2008, Revisiting history to build a new future?The International Journal of the History of Sport, 27, 1675–1693.
48.
RealM. R. (1989). Super media: A cultural studies approach. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
49.
ReeseS. D. (2001). Framing public life: A bridging model for media research . In ReeseS. D.GandyO. H.GrantA. E. (Eds.), Framing public life (pp. 7–31). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
50.
RiggsK. E.EastmanS. T.GolobicT. S. (1993). Manufactured conflict in the 1992 Olympics: The discourse of television and politics. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 10, 253–272.
51.
RinehartR. E. (1996). ‘Fists flew and blood flowed’: Symbolic resistance and international response in Hungarian water polo at the Melbourne Olympics, 1956. Journal of Sport History, 23, 120–139.
52.
RubinA. M.PerseE. M.PowellR. A. (1985). Loneliness, parasocial interaction and local television viewing. Human Communication Research, 12, 155–180.
53.
SalaB. R.ScottJ. T.Spriggs IIJ. F. (2007). The cold war on ice: Constructivism and the politics of Olympic figure skating judging. Perspectives on Politics, 5, 17–29.
54.
SchrammW. (1949). The nature of news. Journalism Quarterly, 26, 259–269.
TooheyK.VealA. J. (2008). The Olympic Games: A social science perspective. Australia: CABI.
60.
TorresC. R. (2011). Morally incompatible? An analysis of the relationship between competitive sport and international relations at the Olympic Games. SAIS Review, 31, 3–16.
61.
TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.RiecherS. D.WetherellM. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
62.
Van HilvoordeI.EllingA.StokvisR. (2010). How to influence national pride? The Olympic medal index as a unifying narrative. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 45, 87–102.
63.
WhissellR.LyonsS.WilkinsonD.WhissellC. (1993). National bias in judgments of Olympic-level skating. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 77, 355–358.
