TV weathercasters are a potentially important source of climate change information: They are a widely trusted source; they have frequent access to large audiences; and most have discussed climate change as part of their duties. Previous research, however, has shown that a significant minority of TV weathercasters disagree with the consensus science. Using multivariate analyses, this article identifies political ideology (conservative) and gender (male), but not age or science training, as predictors for being unconvinced that global warming is occurring; only ideology (conservative) predicts being unconvinced of anthropogenic causes of global warming. Ideology is also the strongest predictor, and gender is a secondary predictor, of trust in sources of climate change information: Conservative weathercasters expressed less trust in all seven science-based sources that were examined. These findings suggest that efforts to improve the quality of climate change reporting among these high-profile specialists must address political and personal ideology in addition to increased science training.
American Association for Public Opinion Research. (2008). Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys (5th ed.). Lenexa, Kansas: AAPOR.
BoykoffM. T.BoykoffJ. M. (2007). Climate change and journalistic norms: A case study of US mass-media coverage. Geoforum, 38, 1190–1204.
5.
Climate change: An information statement of the American Meteorological Society. (2007). Climate change: An information statement of the American Meteorological Society. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 88, 418–421.
DunlapR. E.McCrightA. M. (2008). A widening gap—Republican and democratic views on climate change. Environment, 50, 26–35.
12.
Editorial: “A question of trust” [Editorial]. (2010, July 1). Nature, 466. doi:10.1038/466007a
13.
GauchatG. (2012). Politicization of science in the public sphere: A study of public trust in the United States, 1974–2010. American Sociological Review, 77, 167–187.
HensonB. (2010). Weather on the air: A history of broadcast meteorology. Boston, MA: The American Meteorological Society.
17.
KahanD. M.BramanD.GastilJ.SlovicP.MertzC. K. (2007). Culture and identity-protective cognition: Explaining the white-male effect in risk perception. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4, 465–505.
18.
KahanD. M.Jenkins-SmithH.BrannonD. (2010). Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research, 1, 1–28.
LeiserowitzA.MaibachE.Roser-RenoufC. (2008). Climate change in the American mind: Americans’ global warming beliefs, attitudes, policy preferences, and actions. New Haven, CT: The Yale Project on Climate Change. Retrieved fromhttp://www.climatechangecommunication.org/resources_reports.cfm
21.
LeiserowitzA.MaibachE.Roser-RenoufC. (2010a). Climate change in the American mind: Americans’ global warming beliefs and attitudes in January 2010. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change.
22.
LeiserowitzA.MaibachE.Roser-RenoufC. (2010b). Global Warming’s Six Americas, January 2010. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change.
23.
MaibachE.WilsonK.WitteJ. (2010). A national survey of news directors about climate change. Preliminary findings. George Mason University, Fairfax, VA: Center for Climate Change Communication. Retrieved fromhttp://www.climatchangecommunication.org/resources_reports.cfm
24.
MaibachE.WitteJ.WilsonK. (2011). Climategate undermined belief in global warming and trust in climate scientists among TV meteorologists in the United States. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 92, 31–37.
25.
McCrightA. M. (2010). The effects of gender on climate change knowledge and concern in the American public. Population and Environment, 32, 66–87.
26.
McCrightA. M.DunlapR. E. (2011). The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s view of global warming, 2001–2010. The Sociological Quarterly, 52, 155–194.
OreskesN.ConwayE. M. (2010). Merchants of doubt. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Press.
29.
PachauriR. K.ReisingerA. (2007). Contribution of working groups I, II, and III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In PachauriR. K.ReisingerA. (Eds). Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/syr/en/contents.html
Pew Research Center, Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2010). Americans spending more time following the news: Ideological news sources—Who watches and why. Retrieved fromhttp://people-press.org/report/652/
32.
PotterD.MatsaK.MitchellA. (2011). Local TV: Good news after the fall. (Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism, The State of the News Media, An Annual Report on American Journalism 2011). Retrieved fromhttp://stateofthemedia.org/2011/local-tv-essay/
33.
RyanB.Toohey-MoralesJ. (2007). Guest editorial: Communicating global climate change to the public and clients. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 88, 1164.
34.
SachsmanD.SimonJ.ValentiJ. M. (2008). Environment reporters and U.S. journalists: A comparative analysis. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 7, 1–19.
35.
SilcockB.HeiderD.RogusM. (2007). Managing television news: A handbook for ethical and effective producing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36.
SmithD. (2007). Power producer: A practical guide to TV news producing. Fredericksburg, VA: Radio Television and Digital News Association.
WilsonK. (2002). Forecasting the future: How television weathercasters’ attitudes and beliefs about climate change affect their cognitive knowledge on the science. Science Communication, 24, 246–268.
39.
WilsonK. (2006). Seals of (Dis)approval. Television weathercasters debate the value of voluntary credentials, National Weather Digest, 30, 100–107.
40.
WilsonK. (2008). Television weathercasters as potentially prominent science communicators. Public Understanding of Science, 17, 73–87.
41.
WilsonK. (2009). Opportunities and obstacles for television weathercasters to report on climate change. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 90, 1457–1465.
