Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In recent years, some media organizations have begun to use a new type of animation in news reports that is melodramatic and emotion-laden. These have successfully drawn considerable numbers of viewers to their online news reports. The use of such techniques is controversial and has sparked debate over its appropriateness. An experiment with 153 college students as participants was conducted to compare the perceived credibility of news reports with and without melodramatic animation. The results show that the animation format neither enhances nor dampens news credibility. However, they also show that sound effects reduce the credibility of news reports using melodramatic animation. The perceived credibility was also related to the credibility of the news organization and the medium dependency of the viewer. Implications for animated news media, future research directions, and ethical issues of using such technique are discussed.

Keywords

new media/social media news format experimental method credibility animated news news organization medium use medium dependency

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Addington

D. W.

(1971). The effect of vocal variations on ratings of source credibility. Speech Monographs, 38, 242–247.

Austin

E. W.

Dong

(1994). Source v. content effects on judgments of news believability. Journalism Quarterly, 91, 973–983.

Bacon

F. T.

(1979). Credibility of repeated statements: Memory for trivia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 241–252.

Ball-Rokeach

S. J.

DeFleur

M. L.

(1976). A dependency model of mass-media effects. Communication Research, 3, 3–21.

Bielsa

(2008). The pivotal role of news agencies in the context of globalization: A historical approach. Global Networks, 8, 347–366.

Bracken

C. C.

(2006). Perceived source credibility of local television news: The impact of television form and presence. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50, 723–741.

Bracken

C. C.

Neuendorf

K. A.

Jeffres

L. W.

(2003). Screen size, source credibility, and presence: Audience reactions to televised presidential debates. Paper presented to the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Kansas City, MO. Abstract retrieved from http://www.aejmc.org/home/page/7/?s=Best.

Bucy

E. P.

(2003). Media credibility reconsidered: Synergy effects between on-air and online news. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 80, 247–264.

Burgoon

J. K.

(1978). Attributes of the newscaster’s voice as predictors of his credibility. Journalism Quarterly, 55, 276–281.

10.

Carter

(1989). ABC News divided on simulated events. The New York Times, p. C20.

11.

Chinapost.com.tw. (2011). Next TV’s Lai granted news channel license. Retrieved October 8, 2011, from http://www.chinapost.com.tw/taiwan/national/national-news/2011/07/21/310543/Next-TVs.htm

12.

CNN.com. (2010). The blurry lines of animated ‘new’. Retrieved February 6, 2011, from http://articles.cnn.com/2010-01-30/world/taiwan.animated.news_1_jimmy-lai-hong-kong-woods-accident?_s=PM:WORLD

13.

CNNasiapacific.com. (2010). CNN interviews Jimmy Lai on animation news. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from http://www.cnnasiapacific.com/press/en/content/523

14.

Craig

(2005). Online journalism: Reporting, writing and editing for new media. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.

15.

David

(1998). News concreteness and visual-verbal association: Do news picture narrow the recall gap between concrete and abstract news? Human Communication Research, 25, 180–201.

16.

Flanagin

A. J.

Metzger

M. J.

(2007). The role of site features, user attributes, and information verification behaviors on the perceived credibility of web-based information. New Media and Society, 9, 319–342.

17.

Fox

J. R.

Lang

Chung

Lee

Schwartz

Potter

(2004). Picture this: Effects of graphics on the processing of television news. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48, 646–674.

18.

Friendly

F. W.

(1989). On television: News, lies and videotape. The New York Times, pp. C1, C27.

19.

Gans

H. J.

(1979). Deciding what’s news. New York, NY: Pantheon.

20.

Gaziano

McGrath

(1986). Measuring the concept of credibility. Journalism Quarterly, 63, 451–462.

21.

Globescan. (2006). BBC/Reuters/Media Center Poll: Trust in the media. Retrieved August 27, 2011, from http://www.globescan.com/news_archives/bbcreut.html

22.

Grimes

Rimmer

(1994). TV news simulations and their interaction with viewer memory. Communication Reports, 7, 11–19.

23.

Guardian.co.uk. (2010). Animated news: Blurring the line between fact and fiction. Retrieved February 6, 2011, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/pda/2010/feb/26/animated-news-next-media

24.

Hong Kong Journalists Association. (2011). Animated news is animating the news. Retrieved February 14, 2011, from http://hkthejournalist.blogspot.com/2010/01/animated-news-is-animating-news.html

25.

Huang

Y. K.

(2008). Exploring of the position and value of animation-cartoon industry in China TV news communication. China Media Research, 4, 1–12.

26.

Johnson

T. J.

Kaye

B. K.

(1998). Cruising is believing? Comparing internet and traditional sources on media credibility measures. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 75, 325–340.

27.

Kiousis

(2001). Public trust or mistrust? Perceptions of media credibility in the information age. Mass Communication & Society, 4, 381–403.

28.

Kiousis

(2006). Exploring the impact of modality on perceptions of credibility for online news stories. Journalism Studies, 7, 348–359.

29.

Lesher

(1982). Media unbound: The impact of television journalism on the public. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

30.

(2006). Internet newspapers: The making of a mainstream medium. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

31.

Mackay

Lowrey

(2007). The credibility divide: Reader trust of online newspapers and blogs. Paper presented at International Communication Association, San Francisco, CA. Retrieved from http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/1/7/3/2/6/pages173266/p173266-1.php

32.

Markham

(1968). The dimensions of source credibility of television newscasters. Journal of Communication, 18, 57–64.

33.

Merrill

J. C.

Odell

S. J.

(1983). Philosophy and journalism. White Plains, NY: Longman.

34.

Metzger

M. J.

Flanagin

A. J.

Eyal

Lemus

D. R.

McCann

R. M.

(2003). Credibility for the 21st century: Integrating perspectives on source, message, and media credibility in the contemporary media environment. In Kalbfleisch

P. J.

(Ed.), Communication yearbook 27 (pp. 293–335). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

35.

Meyer

(1988). Defining and measuring credibility of newspapers: Developing an index. Journalism Quarterly, 65, 567–574.

36.

Newhagen

Nass

(1989). Differential criteria for evaluating credibility of newspapers and TV news. Journalism Quarterly, 66, 277–284.

37.

Nexttv.com.tw. (2012). News channel of Next TV. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from http://www.nexttv.com.tw/news

38.

Nytimes.com. (2009). In animated videos, news and guesswork mix. Retrieved January 31, 2012, from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/06/business/media/06animate.html

39.

Nytimes.com. (2011). As news animation go mainstream, Taiwanese pioneers try playing it straight. Retrieved November 17, 2011, from http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/31/as-news-animations-go-mainstream-taiwanese-pioneers-try-playing-it-straight/

40.

Overbeck

(2007). Major principles of media law. Boston, MA: Wadsworth Singer.

41.

Park

(2005). Decomposing Korean news media credibility in the internet age. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18, 238–245.

42.

Porter

Golan

G. J.

(2006). From subservient chickens to brawny men: A comparison of viral advertising to television advertising. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 6, 26–33.

43.

Reeves

Nass

(1996). The Media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Stanford, CA: CSLI.

44.

Schudson

(2001). The objectivity norm in American journalism. Journalism, 2, 149–170.

45.

Seiler

W. J.

(1971). The effects of visual materials on attitudes, credibility, and retention. Speech Monographs, 38, 331–334.

46.

Sundar

S. S.

(2000). Multimedia effects on processing and perception of online news: A study of picture, audio, and video downloads. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 480–499.

47.

Trammell

Porter

Chung

Kim

(2006). Credibility and the uses of blogs among professionals in the communication industry. Paper presented at Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, San Francisco, CA. Abstract retrieved from http://www.aejmc.org/home/2012/01/ctec-2006-abstracts/

48.

Tseng

Fogg

B. J.

(1999). Credibility and computer technology. Communications of the ACM, 42, 39–44.

49.

Tuchman

(1972). Objectivity as strategic ritual: An examination of newsmen's notions of objectivity. The American Journal of Sociology, 77, 660–679.

50.

Wanta

Y. W.

(1994). The effects of credibility, reliance and exposure on media agenda-setting: A path analysis model. Journalism Quarterly, 71, 90–98.

51.

Wired.com. (2010). Taiwan tabloid sensation next media re-creates the news. Retrieved November 16, 2011, from http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/08/mf_appledaily/all/1?pid=2886

52.

Yang

Patwardhan

(2004). Determinants of internet news use: A structural equation model approach. Web Journal of Mass Communication Research, 8. Retrieved February 21, 2011, from http://www.scripps.ohiou.edu/wjmcr/vol08/8-1a.html

53.

Youtube.com. (2011). Apple Action News. Retrieved February 6, 2011, from http://www.youtube.com/user/appleactionews

54.

Zaragoza

M. S.

Mitchell

K. J.

(1996). Repeated exposure to suggestion and the creation of false memories. Psychological Science, 7, 294–300.

Can News Be Imaginative? An Experiment Testing the Perceived Credibility of Melodramatic Animated News,News Organizations,Media Use,and Media Dependency

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References