When child sexual abuse is suspected, it is important for medical professionals to understand normal as well as abnormal features of the external genital and anal tissues in children. Physicians and other healthcare professionals who rarely perform a detailed examination of these areas may mistakenly interpret normal findings, or findings caused by conditions unrelated to abuse, as signs of injury due to sexual abuse. For this reason, it is important for all medical professionals to have a basic understanding of the appearance of the genital and anal tissues in children. Examples of normal and abnormal genital and anal findings are provided via annotated images. This review presents a research-based summary of how medical findings in children should be interpreted with respect to possible sexual abuse. Resources for obtaining expert review of medical findings are described.
Levi-StraussC. The elementary structure of kinship. London: Eyne & Spotterswood; 1969. 541 p.
2.
LascaratosJPoulakou-RebelakouE. Child sexual abuse: historical cases in the Byzantine empire (324-1453 A.D.). Child Abuse Negl. 2000Aug; 24(8):1085–90. PMID: 10983818. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0145-2134(00)00156-3.
3.
KahrB. The sexual molestation of children: historical perspectives. J Psychohist. 1991Fall; 19(2):191–214. PMID: 11622990.
4.
LabbéJ. Ambroise Tardieu: the man and his work on child maltreat-ment a century before Kempe. Child Abuse Negl. 2005Apr; 29(4):311–24. PMID: 15917074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.03.002.
5.
RocheAJFortinGLabbéJ. The work of Ambroise Tardieu: the first description of child abuse. Child Abuse Negl. 2005Apr; 29(4): 325–34. PMID: 15917075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2004.04.007.
6.
KaplanR. Medical response to child sexual abuse, a resource for professionals working with children and families. St. Louis: STM Learning; c2011. Chapter 1, The medical response to child sexual abuse: an historical overview; p. 1–8.
7.
KempeCHSilvermanFNSteeleBF. The battered child syndrome. JAMA. 1962Jul7; 181:17–24. PMID: 14455086.
8.
KempeCH. Sexual abuse, another hidden pediatric problem: the 1977 C. Anderson Aldrich lecture. Pediatrics. 1978Sep; 62(3):382–9. PMID: 704212.
9.
McCannJVorisJSimonMWellsR. Perianal findings in prepubertal children selected for nonabuse: a descriptive study. Child Abuse Negl. 1989Jan; 13(2):179–93. PMID: 2743179. https://doi.org/10.1016/0145-2134(89)90005-7.
10.
McCannJWellsRSimonMVorisJ. Genital findings in prepubertal girls selected for nonabuse: a descriptive study. Pediatrics. 1990Sep; 86(3):428–39. PMID: 2388791.
11.
BerensonABHegerAAndrewsS. Appearance of the hymen in newborns. Pediatrics. 1991Apr; 87(4):458–65. PMID: 2011421.
12.
BerensonAB. A longitudinal study of hymenal morphology in the first 3 years of life. Pediatrics. 1995Apr; 95(4):490–6. PMID: 7700746.
13.
AdamsJAHarperKKnudsonS. A proposed system for the classification of anogenital findings in children with suspected sexual abuse. Adolesc Pediatr Gynecol. 1992Spring; 5(2):73–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0932-8610(19)80070-1.
14.
BerensonABHegerAHHayesJM. Appearance of the hymen in prepubertal girls. Pediatrics. 1992Mar; 89(3):387–94. PMID: 1741209.
McCannJVorisJSimonM. Genital injuries resulting from sexual abuse: a longitudinal study. Pediatrics. 1992Feb; 89(2):307–17. PMID: 1734401.
17.
McCannJVorisJ. Perianal injuries resulting from sexual abuse: a longitudinal study. Pediatrics. 1993Feb; 91(2):390–7. PMID: 8424016.
18.
Heppenstall-HegerAMcConnellGTicsonL. Healing patterns in anogenital injuries: a longitudinal study of injuries associated with sexual abuse, accidental injuries, or genital surgery in the pre adolescent child. Pediatrics. 2003Oct; 112(4):829–37. PMID: 14523174. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.112.4.829.
19.
AdamsJAKelloggNDFarstKJ. Updated guidelines for the medical assessment and care of children who may have been sexually abused. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016Apr; 29(2):81–7. PMID: 26220352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2015.01.007.
20.
AdamsJAFarstKJKelloggND. Interpretation of medical findings in suspected child sexual abuse: an update for 2018. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2018Jun; 31(3):225–31. PMID: 29294380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2017.12.011.
21.
SmithTDRamanSRMadiganS. Anogenital findings in 3569 pediatric examinations for sexual abuse/assault. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2018Apr; 31(2):79–83. PMID: 29111300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2017.10.006.
22.
GallionHRMilamLJLittrellLL. Genital findings in cases of sexual abuse: genital vs. vaginal penetration. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016Dec; 29(6):604–11. PMID: 27184537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2016.05.001.
23.
KelloggNDMenardSWSantosA. Genital anatomy in pregnant adolescents: “normal” does not mean “nothing happened.”Pediatrics. 2004Jan;113(1 Pt 1): e67–9. PMID: 14702498. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.113.1.e67.
24.
AdamsJAStarlingSPFrasierLD. Diagnostic accuracy in child sexual abuse medical evaluation: role of experience, training, and expert case review. Child Abuse Negl. 2012May; 36(5):383–92. PMID: 22632855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2012.01.004.
25.
MyhreAKAdamsJAKaufholdM. Anal findings in children with and without probable anal penetration: a retrospective study of 1115 children referred for suspected sexual abuse. Child Abuse Negl. 2013Jul; 37(7):465–74. PMID: 23618719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.03.011.
ElderDE. Interpretation of anogenital findings in the living child: implications for the pediatric forensic autopsy. J Forensic Leg Med. 2007Nov; 14(8):482–8. PMID: 17961873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2007.03.005.
29.
PellettiGTabuscioSMontisciMSnenghiR. Misinterpretation of anogenital findings and misdiagnosis of child sexual abuse: the role of the forensic pathologist. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016Apr; 29(2): e29–31. PMID: 26485321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2015.10.012.
