Conventional strawberry production in Europe relies on chemical soil fumigation to mitigate the negative effects of soilborne pathogens prevalent in production areas such as Huelva (Spain). Considering the restrictions imposed by European policies on the use of chemicals, the adoption of alternative non-chemically disinfected cropping systems has become an efficient way.
Objective
To ascertain the effectiveness of non-chemically disinfected cropping systems compared to conventional system.
Methods
Yield and fruit quality of six strawberry cultivars were evaluated under two cropping systems: non-chemically disinfected cropping systems by solarization, organic and soilless compared with conventional system currently used in Huelva.
Results
The cultivation system and the cultivars influenced variations in yield (early and total fruit production and plant size) and fruit quality (firmness, soluble solids content and acidity) variables. All cultivars performed better in the conventional system. In biosolarized, organic and soilless systems, yield was lower than in conventional system. Biosolarization was the most suitable system for achieving acceptable yields and quality fruit for most strawberry cultivars which were used in this investigation.
Conclusions
The results showed that all the four cultivation systems still need be optimized and there is some room for further improvement; in this sense, the soilless system could be a promising alternative in the near future in Huelva. In general, ‘Rociera’ and ‘Primavera’ showed the highest average yield per plant, while ‘Calinda’ stood out for its organoleptic fruit quality, underscoring the importance of cultivar choice for achieving high production and quality.
D’UrsoGd’AquinoLPizzaC,et al.Integrated mass spectrometric and multivariate data analysis approaches for the discrimination of organic and conventional strawberry (Fragaria ananassa Duch.) crops. Food Res Int2015; 77: 264–272.
2.
FernandesVCDominguesVFde FreitasV, et al.Strawberries from integrated pest management and organic farming: phenolic composition and antioxidant properties. Food Chem2012; 134: 1926–1931.
3.
MezzettiBGiampieriFZhangYT,et al.Status of strawberry breeding programs and cultivation systems in Europe and the rest of the world. J Berry Res2018; 8: 205–221.
4.
KoukounarasA. Advanced greenhouse horticulture: new technologies and cultivation practices. Horticulturae2021; 7: 1.
5.
JinPWangSYWangCY,et al.Effect of cultural system and storage temperature on antioxidant capacity and phenolic compounds in strawberries. Food Chem2011; 124: 262–270.
6.
FussyAPapenbrockJ. An overview of soil and soilless cultivation techniques—chances, challenges and the neglected question of sustainability. Plants2022; 11: 1153.
López MedinaJ. Tecnología de vanguardia en el cultivo de la fresa de Huelva: plasticultura y cultivo sin suelo. In Fundación Caja Rural del Sur (Ed). El sector agrario en la provincia de Huelva 2009–2010. Sevilla, Spain. 2011. p. 183–194.
9.
López-ArandaJM. Agricultural production in the EU five years after the end of methyl bromide: problems and solutions. In: USDA (Ed). Proceedings of annual international research conference on methyl bromide alternatives and emissions reductions. San Diego (CA), USA. 2003, pp. 3–6.
10.
De los SantosBMedinaJJMirandaL, et al.Soil disifestation efficacy against soil fungal pathogens in strawberry crops in Spain: an overview. Agronomy2021; 11: 26.
11.
DomínguezPMirandaLSoriaC, et al.Soil biosolarization for sustainable strawberry production. Agron Sustain Dev2014; 34: 821–829.
12.
KirkegaardJAGardnerPADesmarchelierJM,et al.Biofumigation—using Brassica species to control pests and diseases in horticulture and agriculture. In: WrattenNMailerRJ (eds) Proceedings 9th Australian research assembly on brassicas, agricultural research institute. Wagga Wagga, Australia: CSIRO, 1993, pp.77–82.
13.
López-MedinaJ. New technologies. Technological revolution. In: de AndalucíaJ (eds) The strawberry crop at Huelva. Sevilla, Spain: Ideas, Exclusivas y Publicidad S.L., 2008, pp.175–218.
14.
Van OsEA. Closed soilless growing systems: a sustainable solution for Dutch greenhouse horticulture. Water Sci Technology1999; 39: 105–112.
15.
Jamwal M, Sharma N. Soilless culture. In: RM Sharma, Y Rakesh and AK Dubey, et al. (eds) Strawberries: production, postharvest management and protection. Boca Raton, United States, 2016, pp. 373–398. https://doi.org/10.1201/b21441.
16.
López-MedinaJPeralboAFloresF. Closed soilless growing system: a sustainable solution for strawberry crop in Huelva (Spain). Acta Hortic2004; 649: 213–215.
17.
RouphaelYCollaGBattistelliA, et al.Yield, water requirement, nutrient uptake and fruit quality of zucchini squash grown in soil and closed soilless culture. J Hortic Sci Biotech2004; 79: 423–430.
18.
AkhatouIFernandez-RecamalesA. Influence of cultivar and culture system on nutritional and organoleptic quality of strawberry. J Sci Food. Agric2014; 94: 866–875.
19.
ArizaMTMartínez-FerriEDominguezP, et al.Effects of harvest time on functional compounds and fruit antioxidant capacity in ten strawberry cultivars. J Berry Res2015; 5: 71–80.
20.
ArizaMTMirandaLMartínez-FerriE, et al.Consistency of organoleptic and yield related traits of strawberry cultivars over time. J Berry Res2020; 10: 623–636.
21.
MacitIKoçAGülerS,et al.Yield, quality and nutritional status of organically and conventionally-grown strawberry cultivars. Asian J Plant Sci2007; 6: 1131–1136.
22.
RichardsonMLArlottaCGLewersKS. Yield and nutrients of six cultivars of strawberries grown in five urban cropping systems. Sci Hortic2022; 294: 110775.
23.
López-ArandaJM. The cultivation of the strawberry in Huelva. In: de AndalucíaJ (eds) The strawberry crop at Huelva. Sevilla, Spain: Ideas, Exclusivas y Publicidad S.L., 2008, pp.101–174.
24.
LarsonKDDaugovishOShawD. Optimizing strawberry production and fruit quality with use of protected culture in southern California. Acta Hortic2009; 842: 171–176.
25.
EU. Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32018R0848 (Accessed 27 September 2024).
26.
PatrignaniAOchsnerTE. Canopeo: a powerful new tool for measuring fractional green canopy cover. Agron J2015; 107: 2312–2320.
27.
Martinez-FerriESoriaCArizaMT, et al.Water relations, growth and physiological response of seven strawberry cultivars (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) to different water availability. Agric Water Manage2016; 164: 73–82.
KaderAA. Quality and its maintenance in relation to the postharvest physiology of strawberry. In: LubyJJDaleA (eds) The strawberry into the twenty-first century. Portland, OR: Timber Press, 1991, pp.145–152.
30.
GaoSWilhoitL. Fumigant use and transition from methyl bromide to alternatives in California. In: Proceedings of the 2011 annual international research conference on methyl bromide alternatives and emissions reductions, 31 October–2 November, San Diego, CA, USA, 2011, pp.741–744.
31.
GiovanniniDBrandiFLanteriAP, et al.Non-Chemical soil fumigation for sustainable strawberry production in southern Italy. Agronomy2021; 11: 1678.
32.
LietenP. Advances in strawberry substrate culture during the last twenty years in The Netherlands and Belgium. Int J Fruit Sci2013; 13: 84–90.
33.
Medina-MínguezJJMirandaLDomínguezP, et al.Comparison of different chemical and non-chemical alternatives to methyl bromide for strawberry in Huelva (Spain). J Berry Res2012; 2: 113–121.
34.
di LorenzoRPisciottaASantamariaP,et al.From soil to soil-less in horticulture: quality and typicity. Italian J Agron2013; 8: 30.
35.
PutraPAYuliandoH. Soilless culture system to support water use efficiency and product quality: a review. Agric Sci Proced2015; 3: 283–288.
36.
KrügerEJosuttisMNestbyR, et al.Influence of growing conditions at different latitudes of Europe on strawberry growth performance, yield and quality. J Berry Res2012; 2: 143–157.
37.
GrudaN. Do soilless culture systems have an influence on product quality of vegetables?J App Bot Food Qual2009; 82: 141–147.
38.
GavilánPRuizNMirandaL, et al.Improvement of strawberry irrigation sustainability in southern Spain using FAO methodology. Water (Basel)2021; 13: 33.
39.
ChamorroMDomínguezPMedinaJJ, et al.Assessment of chemical and biosolarization treatments for the control of Macrophomina phaseolina in strawberries. Sci Hort2015; 192: 361–368.
40.
ZhangDChengHHaoB, et al.Effect of fresh chicken manure as a non-chemical soil fumigant on soil-borne pathogens, plant growth and strawberry fruit profitability. Crop Prot2021; 146: 105653.
41.
ArizaMTMirandaLGómez-MoraJA, et al.Yield and fruit quality of strawberry cultivars under different irrigation regimes. Agronomy2021; 11: 61.
42.
SiedtMSchäfferASmithKEC, et al.Comparing straw, compost, and biochar regarding their suitability as agricultural soil amendments to affect soil structure, nutrient leaching, microbial communities, and the fate of pesticides. Sci Total Environ2021; 751: 141607.
43.
GossMJTubeilehAGoorahooD. A review of the use of organic amendments and the risk to human health. Adv Agron2013; 120: 275–379.
44.
SemenovMVZhelezovaAKsenofontovaNA, et al.Chicken manure as an organic fertilizer: composting technologies and impact on soil properties. Dokuchaev Soil Bulletin 2023. https://doi.org/10.19047/0136-1694-2023-115-160-198. 2023.
45.
Crecente-CampoJMNunes–DamacenoMARodriguezR, et al.Color, anthocyanin pigment, ascorbic acid and total phenolic compound determination in organic versus conventional strawberries (Fragaria × ananassa Duch. cv. Selva). J Food Comp Anal. 2012;28:23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2012.07.004
46.
KhalilHAHassanSM. Ascorbic acid, β-carotene, total phenolic compound and microbiological quality of organic and conventional citrus and strawberry grown in Egypt. Afr J Biotechnol2015; 14: 272–277.
47.
ReganoldJPAndrewsPKReeveJR, et al.Fruit and soil quality of organic and conventional strawberry agroecosystems. PLoS ONE2010; 5: e12346.
48.
GiampieriFMazzoniLCianciosiD, et al.Organic vs conventional plant-based foods: a review. Food Chem2022; 383: 132352.
49.
GliessmanSRWernerMRAllisonJ,et al.A comparison of strawberry plant development and yield under organic and conventional management on the central California coast. Biol Agric Hortic1996; 12: 327–338.
50.
AndersonHCRogersMAHooverEE. Low tunnel covering and microclimate, fruit yield, and quality in an organic strawberry production system. Horttech2019; 29: 590–598.
51.
Romero-GámezMSuárez-ReyE. Huella ambiental del cultivo de la fresa. Horticultura2018; 339: 20–25.
52.
SavvasDGianquintoGPTüzelY,et al.Soilless culture. In: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (Ed.). Good Agricultural Practices for greenhouse vegetable crops. Principles for Mediterranean climate areas. FAO, Rome, Italy. Plant Production and Protection Paper. 2013;217:303–354.
53.
TakedaF. Strawberry production in soilless culture systems. Acta Hortic1999; 481: 289–296.
54.
DaugaardH. Table-top production of strawberries: performance of six strawberry cultivars. Acta Agric Scand Section B: Soil Plant Sci2008; 5: 261–266.
55.
Pérez De CamacaroMECamacaroGJHadleyP, et al.Effect of plant density and initial crown size on growth, development and yield in strawberry cultivars Elsanta and Bolero. J Hortic Sci Biotech2004; 79: 739–746.
56.
DielMIViníciusMPinheiroM, et al.Cultivation of strawberry in substrate: productivity and fruit quality are affected by the cultivar origin and substrates. Cience Agrotecnol2018; 42: 229–239.
57.
AzodanlouRDarbellayCLuisierJL, et al.Quality assessment of strawberries (Fragaria species). J Agric Food Chem2003; 51: 715–721.
58.
SchwietermanMLColquhounTAJaworskiEA, et al.Strawberry flavor: diverse chemical compositions, a seasonal influence, and effects on sensory perception. PLoS ONE2014; 9: e88446.
59.
ŠamecDMareticMLugaricI, et al.Assessment of the differences in the physical, chemical and phytochemical properties of four strawberry cultivars using principal component analysis. Food Chem2016; 194: 828–834.
60.
PistonFPerezAGSanzC,et al.Strawberry postharvest shelf life is related to total acid content and fruit firmness. Acta Hortic2021; 309: 869–872.
61.
BihariCAhamadSKumarM, et al.Innovative soilless culture techniques for horticultural crops: a comprehensive review. Int J Environ Clim Change2023; 13: 4071–4084.
62.
Romero-GámezMSuárez-ReyE. Environmental footprint of cultivating strawberry in Spain. Int J Life Cycle Assess2020; 25: 719–732.
63.
RysinOMcWhirtAFernándezG, et al.Economic viability and environmental impact assessment of three different strawberry production systems in the southeastern United States. Horttech2015; 25: 585–594.
