Abstract
Organizational decision-making frequently occurs in environments characterized by uncertainty, heterogeneous information, and qualitative expert judgment, which classical quantitative models cannot adequately capture. This article develops a mathematically grounded, fuzzy-logic–based theoretical decision architecture to enhance robustness, interpretability, and scalability in complex organizational systems. Building on an integrative synthesis of recent advances in fuzzy MCDM methods, AI-enhanced fuzzy inference, and sustainability-oriented performance modeling, three dominant research clusters are identified and consolidated into a unified multilayer framework. The proposed model is structured around four interdependent components—contextual conditions, technical fuzzy mechanisms, moderating structures, and observable outcomes—linked through an explicit feedback process formalized via composite fuzzy operators. Rather than introducing new algorithms, the framework specifies how established fuzzy components are functionally differentiated, constrained, and coordinated at the system level. It explains how expert-judgment quality, membership-function calibration, inference engines, interoperability with enterprise systems, and validation and traceability mechanisms jointly determine decision stability and transparency. The model further establishes key formal properties, including monotonicity, boundedness, adaptive stability, and traceable reproducibility, ensuring internal coherence and well-behaved system dynamics. By addressing the lack of unified, reproducible, and scalable architectures in the fuzzy decision-making literature, this study provides a generalizable theoretical foundation for explainable, sustainability-aligned intelligent decision systems under organizational uncertainty.
A Clear and Practical Framework for Improving Decision-Making under Uncertainty Using Fuzzy Logic and Artificial Intelligence
This article presents an accessible, system-level framework that explains how organizations can make better, more transparent, and more reliable decisions under conditions of incomplete or uncertain information by structuring and coordinating fuzzy logic, artificial intelligence, and expert knowledge within an integrated decision-support architecture.
Organizations often need to make important decisions in situations where information is incomplete, uncertain, or partly subjective. In these contexts, managers and experts rely on experience and judgment, but traditional numerical models are often unable to capture this reasoning clearly or consistently. As a result, decisions may become difficult to explain, hard to reproduce, or unreliable over time. This article presents a clear, structured framework for organizing fuzzy logic and artificial intelligence into a complete decision system to support better organizational decision-making. Instead of proposing a new algorithm or software tool, the study explains how different elements of decision-making should be arranged and coordinated at the system level to ensure reliability, transparency, and scalability.
The framework is organized into four connected layers. The first layer captures the decision context, including uncertainty, expert judgment, and organizational data. The second layer consists of the technical mechanisms—such as fuzzy logic models and AI-based adaptation—that process this information. The third layer focuses on validation, traceability, and organizational learning, which help ensure that decisions can be audited and consistently reproduced. The final layer represents the decision outcomes, which can be directly linked to performance and sustainability indicators, such as ESG metrics or Balanced Scorecard dashboards. A key contribution of the framework is the inclusion of a feedback loop that enables organizations to learn from past decisions and improve future ones without altering the system's overall structure. Overall, the article provides researchers and practitioners with a practical, understandable approach to designing intelligent decision-support systems that remain explainable, stable, and trustworthy in uncertain organizational environments.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
