The shift in agricultural production enabled by modern technology has led to the adoption of intelligent and autonomous systems, marking the Agriculture 5.0 era. Drones play a crucial role in this system, and as their use continues to expand, selecting the appropriate drones presents a complex multi-criteria decision-making problem that requires careful consideration of various factors. In this study, drones were evaluated and selected based on technical, economic, and environmental criteria. The decision-making process used interval type-2 fuzzy sets (IT2F) to incorporate uncertainty, and the model focused on ten criteria and five available drones in the Serbian market. It integrated the SiWeC (Simple Weight Calculation) method to determine criteria weights and the CRADIS (Compromise Ranking of Alternatives from Distance to Ideal Solution) method to rank the drones, forming a hybrid approach. The results indicated that Ease of Use (C6), Price (C8), and Maintenance Costs (C7) had the greatest influence on the final decision. Drone 4 achieved the highest score of 0.969 based on expert assessment, outperforming the second-ranked Drone 1 by 12%. Sensitivity analysis across 30 scenarios confirmed the stability of the ranking and showed that individual criteria did not significantly impact the results. The proposed IT2F SiWeC-CRADIS model demonstrated strong robustness and reliability and could be applied to select other smart technologies within the framework of Agriculture 5.0.
AbbasA.ZhangZ.ZhengH.AlamiM. M.AlrefaeiA. F.AbbasQ.NaqviS. A. H.RaoM. J.MosaW. F. A.AbbasQ.HussainA.HassanM. Z.ZhouL. (2023). Drones in plant disease assessment, efficient monitoring, and detection: A way forward to smart agriculture. Agronomy, 13(6), 1524. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13061524
2.
AhmedM.AshrafS.MashatD. S. (2024). Complex intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy aggregation information and their application in decision making problems. Acadlore Transactions on Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 2(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.56578/atams020101
3.
AlaminA.RahamanM.MondalS. P. (2025). Geometric approach for solving first order non-homogenous fuzzy difference equation. Spectrum of Operational Research, 2(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.31181/sor2120257
4.
ArafatM. Y.AlamM. M.MohS. (2023). Vision-Based navigation techniques for unmanned aerial vehicles: Review and challenges. Drones, 7(2), 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7020089
5.
AyamgaM.TekinerdoganB.KassahunA.RambaldiG. (2021). Developing a policy framework for adoption and management of drones for agriculture in Africa. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 33(8), 970–987. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2020.1858047
6.
BarcelosC. O.Fagundes-JúniorL. A.MendesA. L. C.GandolfoD. C.BrandãoA. S. (2024). Integration of payload sensors to enhance UAV-based spraying. Drones, 8(9), 490. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8090490
7.
BenedekA.RokickiT.SzeberényiA. (2023). Bibliometric evaluation of energy efficiency in agriculture. Energies, 16(16), 5942. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16165942
8.
BissaduK. D.SonkoS.HossainG. (2024). Society 5.0 enabled agriculture: Drivers, enabling technologies, architectures, opportunities, and challenges. Information Processing in Agriculture, 12(1), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2024.04.003
9.
BiswasA.GaziK. H.BhaduriP.MondalS. P. (2024). Neutrosophic fuzzy decision-making framework for site selection. Journal of Decision Analytics and Intelligent Computing, 4(1), 187–215. https://doi.org/10.31181/jdaic10004122024b
10.
BožanićD.PuškaA.TešićD.ŠtilićA.UllahK.MuhsenY.HezamI. (2025). Fuzzy AHP - fuzzy MABAC model for ranking a combined construction machine - backhoe loader. Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering, 23(3), 605–625. https://doi.org/10.22190/FUME250801030B
11.
BuiS. T.LuuQ. K.NguyenD. Q.LeN. D. M.LoiannoG.HoV. A. (2023). Tombopropeller: Bioinspired deformable structure toward collision-accommodated control for drones. IEEE Transactions on Robotics: A Publication of the IEEE Robotics and Automation Society, 39(1), 521–538. https://doi.org/10.1109/tro.2022.3198494
12.
CălinaJ.CălinaA.MiluțM.CroitoruA.StanI.BuzatuC. (2020). Use of drones in cadastral works and precision works in silviculture and agriculture. Romanian Agricultural Research, 37, 273–284. https://doi.org/10.59665/rar3730
13.
CarusoA.ChessaS.EscolarS.BarbaJ.LopezJ. C. (2021). Collection of data with drones in precision agriculture: Analytical model and LoRa case study. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8(22), 16692–16704. https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2021.3075561
14.
CastroJ.Alcaraz-SeguraD.BaltzerJ. L.AmorósL.Morales-RuedaF.TabikS. (2024). Automated precise seeding with drones and artificial intelligence: A workflow. Restoration Ecology, 32(5), e14164. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14164
15.
ChinR.CatalC.KassahunA. (2023). Plant disease detection using drones in precision agriculture. Precision Agriculture, 24(5), 1663–1682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-023-10014-y
16.
De FazioR.DinoiL. M.De VittorioM.ViscontiP. (2021). A sensor-based drone for pollutants detection in eco-friendly cities: Hardware design and data analysis application. Electronics, 11(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11010052
17.
DeveciM.CanıtezF.GökaşarI. (2018). WASPAS And TOPSIS based interval type-2 fuzzy MCDM method for a selection of a car sharing station. Sustainable Cities and Society, 41, 777–791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.05.034
18.
DhillonR.MoncurQ. (2023). Small-scale farming: A review of challenges and potential opportunities offered by technological advancements. Sustainability, 15(21), 15478. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115478
19.
FuW. S.DuJ. Q.ZhangY.WangZ. Q. (2024). A blockchain cross-chain solution based on relays. International Journal of Knowledge and Innovation Studies, 2(2), 70–80. https://doi.org/10.56578/ijkis020202
20.
GulR. (2025). An extension of VIKOR approach for MCDM using bipolar fuzzy preference δ-covering based bipolar fuzzy rough set model. Spectrum of Operational Research, 2(1), 72–91. https://doi.org/10.31181/sor21202511
21.
HafeezA.HusainM. A.SinghS. P.ChauhanA.KhanM. T.KumarN.ChauhanA.SoniS. K. (2023). Implementation of drone technology for farm monitoring & pesticide spraying: A review. Information Processing in Agriculture, 10(2), 192–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2022.02.002
22.
HusseinM.NouacerR.CorradiF.OuhammouY.VillarE.TieriC.CastiñeiraR. (2021). Key technologies for safe and autonomous drones. Microprocessors and Microsystems, 87, 104348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpro.2021.104348
23.
ImranR.UllahK.AliZ.AkramM. (2024). A multi-criteria group decision-making approach for robot selection using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information and Aczel-Alsina Bonferroni means. Spectrum of Decision Making and Applications, 1(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.31181/sdmap1120241
24.
InoueY. (2020). Satellite- and drone-based remote sensing of crops and soils for smart farming – a review. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 66(6), 798–810. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2020.1738899
25.
JavaidM.HaleemA.SinghR. P.SumanR. (2022). Enhancing smart farming through the applications of agriculture 4.0 technologies. International Journal of Intelligent Networks, 3, 150–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijin.2022.09.004
26.
KamranM.AshrafS.Kalim KhanS.Hussain KhanA.ZardiH.MehmoodS. (2024). Integrated decision-making framework for hospital development: A single-valued neutrosophic probabilistic hesitant fuzzy approach with innovative aggregation operators. Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research, 34(3), 515–550. https://doi.org/10.2298/YJOR230915034K
27.
KizielewiczB.SałabunW. (2024). SITW Method: A new approach to Re-identifying multi-criteria weights in Complex decision analysis. Spectrum of Mechanical Engineering and Operational Research, 1(1), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.31181/smeor11202419
28.
KonstantoudakisK.ChristakiK.TsiakmakisD.SainidisD.AlbanisG.DimouA.DarasP. (2022). Drone control in AR: An intuitive system for single-handed gesture control, drone tracking, and contextualized camera feed visualization in augmented reality. Drones, 6(2), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones6020043
29.
LiW. Q.HanX. X.LinZ. B.RahmanA. (2024). Enhanced pest and disease detection in agriculture using deep learning-enabled drones. Acadlore Transactions on AI and Machine Learning, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.56578/ataiml030101
30.
Luis-RuizJ. M. d.Sedano-CibriánJ.Pereda-GarcíaR.Pérez-ÁlvarezR.Malagón-PicónB. (2021). Optimization of photogrammetric flights with UAVs for the metric virtualization of archaeological sites. Application to juliobriga (cantabria, Spain). Applied Sciences, 11(3), 1204. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11031204
31.
MaghazeiO.LewisM. A.NetlandT. H. (2022). Emerging technologies and the use case: A multi-year study of drone adoption. Journal of Operations Management, 68(6-7), 560–591. https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.1196
32.
MaitiS.RoyS.SahaC.DasG. (2024). Fractional programming for Stackelberg game under type-2 fuzzy environment. Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research, 35(3), 681–723. https://doi.org/10.2298/YJOR230915049M
33.
McCarthyC.NyoniY.KachambaD. J.BandaL. B.MoyoB.ChisambiC.BanfillJ.HoshinoB. (2023). Can drones help smallholder farmers improve agriculture efficiencies and reduce food insecurity in sub-saharan Africa? Local perceptions from Malawi. Agriculture, 13(5), 1075. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13051075
34.
MeshramA. T.VanalkarA. V.KalambeK. B.BadarA. M. (2022). Pesticide spraying robot for precision agriculture: A categorical literature review and future trends. Journal of Field Robotics, 39(2), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.22043
35.
MichelsM.von HobeC.-F.Weller von AhlefeldP. J.MusshoffO. (2021). The adoption of drones in German agriculture: A structural equation model. Precision Agriculture, 22(6), 1728–1748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-021-09809-8
36.
NasserA. R.AzarA. T.HumaidiA. J.Al-MhdawiA. K.IbraheemI. K. (2021). Intelligent fault detection and identification approach for analog electronic circuits based on fuzzy logic classifier. Electronics, 10(23), 2888. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10232888
37.
NendissaD. R.TamelanP. G.WinarnoS. T.LerikM. D. C.RatuJ. M. (2026). Role of the organic agriculture market in achieving sustainable development goals in Indonesia: A systematic literature review. Organic Farming, 12(1), 11–29. https://doi.org/10.56578/of120102
38.
NguyenM. A.DangG. T.-H.HàM. H.PhamM.-T. (2022). The min-cost parallel drone scheduling vehicle routing problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 299(3), 910–930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.07.008
39.
PratelliA.BrocchiniL.PetriM. (2024). Optimising drone-assisted logistics for urban last-mile delivery: An overview of applications, methodologies, and emerging trends. Journal of Urban Development and Management, 3(3), 188–197. https://doi.org/10.56578/judm030304
40.
PuškaA.NedeljkovićM.PamučarD.BožanićD.SimićV. (2024a). Application of the new simple weight calculation (SIWEC) method in the case study in the sales channels of agricultural products. MethodsX, 13, 102930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2024.102930
41.
PuškaA.NedeljkovićM.ŠtilićA.BožanićD. (2024b). Evaluation of affordable agricultural drones for small and Medium farms. Eng, 5(4), 3161–3173. https://doi.org/10.3390/eng5040166
42.
PuškaA.StevićŽPamučarD. (2022). Evaluation and selection of healthcare waste incinerators using extended sustainability criteria and multi-criteria analysis methods. Environment Development and Sustainability, 24(9), 11195–11225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01902-2
43.
QuamarM. M.Al-RamadanB.KhanK.ShafiullahM.El FerikS. (2023). Advancements and applications of drone-integrated geographic information system technology-A review. Remote Sensing, 15(20), 5039. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15205039
44.
QuemadaC.Pérez-EscuderoJ. M.GonzaloR.EderraI.SantestebanL. G.TorresN.IriarteJ. C. (2021). Remote sensing for plant water content monitoring: A review. Remote Sensing, 13(11), 2088. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13112088
RudrakarS.RughaniP. (2024). Iot based agriculture (ag-IoT): A detailed study on architecture, security and forensics. Information Processing in Agriculture, 11(4), 524–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2023.09.002
47.
ShiY.LinY.LiB.Yi Man LiR. (2022). A bi-objective optimization model for the medical supplies’ simultaneous pickup and delivery with drones. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 171, 108389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108389
48.
TamkeF.BuscherU. (2023). The vehicle routing problem with drones and drone speed selection. Computers & Operations Research, 152, 106112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2022.106112
49.
TavanaM.ShaabaniA.Di CaprioD.BonyaniA. (2022). A novel interval type-2 fuzzy best-worst method and combined compromise solution for evaluating eco-friendly packaging alternatives. Expert Systems with Applications, 200, 117188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117188
50.
TavillaG.CrisafulliA.MinissaleP.TomaselliV.AdamoM. (2024). The use of drones for cost-effective surveys in natura 2000 protected areas: A case study on monitoring plant diversity in sicily (Italy). Land, 13(6), 804. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13060804
51.
TešićD.KhalilzadehM. (2024). Development of the rough defining interrelationships between ranked criteria II method and its application in the MCDM model. Journal of Decision Analytics and Intelligent Computing, 4(1), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.31181/jdaic10009102024t
UritiA.PothabathulaN. J. (2025). Deepharvestnet: Depth-visual fusion network for robust apple detection in Complex orchard environments. International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements, 13(3), 554–575. https://doi.org/10.56578/ijcmem130307
54.
VishwathN. C. A.YadavA. R.MehraV.PatelV.PatelM. K. B.SondagarV.SharmaA.SinghG. (2024). Computational analysis and designing of flight controllers to improve the drone performance for a novice pilot. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 19, 1395–1408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-024-02161-x
55.
XiangC.ChengW.ZhengX.WuT.FanX.WangY.ZhouY.XiaoF. (2023). Enabling cost-effective wireless data collection by piggybacking on delivery drones in agriculture. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks, Article in press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3595296
56.
XuW.DasD. K.StevićŽSubotićM.AlrasheediA. F.SunS. (2023). Trapezoidal interval type-2 fuzzy PIPRECIA-MARCOS model for management efficiency of traffic flow on observed road sections. Mathematics, 11(12), 2652. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11122652
ZhangJ.CampbellJ. F.SweeneyD. C.HupmanA. C. (2021). Energy consumption models for delivery drones: A comparison and assessment. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 90, 102668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102668
59.
ZhangJ. Z.SrivastavaP. R.EachempatiP. (2023). Evaluating the effectiveness of drones in emergency situations: A hybrid multi-criteria approach. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 123(1), 302–323. https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-01-2021-0064
60.
ZhangR.PuškaA.StevićŽZavadskasE. K. (2025). A novel interval type-2 fuzzy MCDM model for evaluation of suitable systems of renewable sources from financial and sustainable aspect. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 59(2), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.24818/18423264/59.2.25.20
