This work presents the simulation and optimization of a novel surface acoustic wave (SAW) hydrogen sensor based on a graphene oxide (GO) layer decorated with palladium nanoparticles (Pd NPs) on a lithium niobate (LiNbO3) substrate. A finite element method (FEM) was used to model the sensor, and a response surface methodology (RSM) was applied to optimize key parameters, including substrate thickness, interdigital transducer spacing, and operating frequency. The design space was statistically explored using the least squares method (LSM). The optimized configuration yielded an insertion loss of −1.06 dB at 80 MHz with a 74.74 µm substrate thickness and 6.90 mm transducer spacing. The sensor demonstrated excellent performance, with time delay and amplitude sensitivities of 26 ns and 0.72 dB per atomic fraction (af) of hydrogen in Pd, respectively. These results highlight the potential of the proposed SAW device for reliable hydrogen leak detection in safety-critical environments.
AbrahamN.Reshma KrishnakumarR.UnniC., et al. (2019). Simulation studies on the responses of ZnO-CuO/CNT nanocomposite based SAW sensor to various volatile organic chemicals. Journal of Science: Advanced Materials and Devices, 4(1), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsamd.2018.12.006
2.
AchourB.AttiaG.ZerroukiC., et al. (2020). Simulation/experiment confrontation, an efficient approach for sensitive SAW sensors design. Sensors, 20(17), 4994. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20174994
AmorimD.SousaP. C.AbreuC., et al. (2025). A review of SAW-based micro- and nanoparticle manipulation in microfluidics. Sensors, 25(5), 1577. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25051577
5.
AslamM. Z.ZhangH.SreejithV. S., et al. (2023). Advances in the surface acoustic wave sensors for industrial applications: Potentials, challenges, and future directions: A review. Measurement, 222, 113657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113657
6.
AtashbarM. Z.BazuinB. J.SimpehM., et al. (2005). 3D FE simulation of H2 SAW gas sensor. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 111–112, 213–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2005.06.054
7.
Ba HashwanS. S.KhirM.NawiI. M., et al. (2023). A review of piezoelectric MEMS sensors and actuators for gas detection application. Discover Nano, 18, 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-023-03779-8
8.
BallantineD. S.WhiteR. M.MartinS. J., et al. (1996). Acoustic wave sensors: theory, design and physico-chemical applications. Elsevier.
9.
Bel Hadj JradE.BelhajM.DridiC. (2023). Parameters estimation for PEDOT:PSS based UV light sensors using an improved numerical platform. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 70(1), 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2022.3224099
10.
BelhajM.Bel Hadj JradE.GrymJ., et al. (2025). Development of new sustainable near-UV photodetector devices based on Polymer/ZnO NR heterojunctions with improved responsivity. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 72(2), 755–760. https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2024.3520547
11.
BourichaB.SekrafiT.LabidiA., et al. (2022). VOCs identification method based on one single ZnTTP sensor. IEEE Sensors Journal, 22(1), 671–677. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2021.3129447
12.
BoxG. E.WilsonK. B. (1992). On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. In: Breakthroughs in statistics: Methodology and distribution (pp. 270–310). Springer.
13.
CominiE.FagliaG.SberveglieriG. (2008). Solid State Gas Sensing. Springer.
14.
CrowlD. A.JoY.-D. (2007). The hazards and risks of hydrogen. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 20(2), 158–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2007.02.002
15.
DépatureC. (2017) Inverter controls of a fuel cell vehicle and supercapacitors. PhD Thesis, University of Quebec in Trois-Rivières.
16.
DinevaP.GrossD.MüllerR., et al. (2014). Piezoelectric materials. Dynamic Fracture of Piezoelectric Materials: Solution of Time-Harmonic Problems via BIEM, 212, 7–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03961-9_2
17.
EL GowiniM. M.MoussaW. A. (2010). A finite element model of a MEMS-based surface acoustic wave hydrogen sensor. Sensors, 10(2), 1232–1250. https://doi.org/10.3390/s100201232
18.
FabreA.FinotE.DemomentJ., et al. (2003). In situ measurement of elastic properties of PdHx, PdDx, and PdTx. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 356–357, 372–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8388(03)00269-X
19.
FallahniaE.NabaviS. (2021). Design of SAW hydrogen detector based on graphene-palladium nanoparticles. Microsystem Technologies, 27, 2033–2039. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-020-04972-w
20.
FilhoA. P.BalashovS. (2015). Influence of the deposition parameters of graphene oxide nanofilms on the kinetic characteristics of the SAW humidity sensor. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 217, 88–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2014.11.050
21.
GeorgeS. P.IsaacJ.PhilipJ. (2021). FEM Simulation of palladium thin film coated surface acoustic wave hydrogen sensor for high frequency applications. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 41(5), 5759–5768. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-189895
22.
GoupyJ.CreightonL. (2009). Introduction aux plans d’expériences: avec applications. Dunod.
23.
HauglustaineD.PaulotF.CollinsW., et al. (2022). Climate benefit of a future hydrogen economy. Communications Earth & Environment, 3, 295. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00626-z
24.
IonescuV. (2015). Design and analysis of a Rayleigh saw resonator for gas detecting applications. Romanian Journal of Physics, 60, 502–511.
25.
JaswirI.NoviendriD.TaherM., et al. (2019). Optimization and formulation of fucoxanthin-loaded microsphere (F-LM) using response surface methodology (RSM) and analysis of its fucoxanthin release profile. Molecules, 24(5), 947. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24050947
26.
JiJ.ZhaoM.UedaT. (2021). High-sensitivity hydrogen leakage sensor for new-energy vehicles. Sensors and Materials, 33(4), 1137–1147. https://doi.org/10.18494/SAM.2021.2993
27.
JulianW. G.VijayK. V.OsamaO. A. (2001). Microsensors, MEMS, and Smart Devices. John Wiley & Sons.
28.
KatzirS. (2006). The discovery of the piezoelectric effect. In The beginnings of piezoelectricity: A study in mundane physics (pp. 15–64). Springer Dordrecht.
29.
KumarA.PrajeshR. (2022). The potential of acoustic wave devices for gas sensing applications. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 339, 113498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2022.113498
30.
LerchR. (1990). Simulation of piezoelectric devices by two- and three-dimensional finite elements. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 37(3), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1109/58.55314
LiuX.WangW.ZhangY., et al. (2018). Enhanced sensitivity of a hydrogen sulfide sensor based on surface acoustic waves at room temperature. Sensors, 18(11), 3796. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18113796
33.
LiuZ.ZhangR.DuanZ., et al. (2024). A hydrogen sensor based on an acoustic topological material with a coiled structure. Journal of Applied Physics, 136(2), 024503. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0211666
34.
LukoseV.NemadeH. B. (2019). Finite element simulation of one-port surface acoustic wave resonator with thick interdigital transducer for gas sensing. Microsyst Technol, 25, 441–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-018-4015-y
35.
MiaoH.DongS.LiF. (2016). Excitation of fundamental shear horizontal wave by using face-shear (d36) piezoelectric ceramics. Journal of Applied Physics, 119(17), 174101. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4948473
RathodV. T. (2020). A review of acoustic impedance matching techniques for piezoelectric sensors and transducers. Sensors, 20(14), 4051. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20144051
38.
RenZ.CuiB.ChengL., et al. (2024). Temperature and humidity effects on SAW hydrogen sensor and compensation method. IEEE Sensors Journal, 24(14), 22317–22325. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2024.3408283
39.
RezićI.KišA. (2020). Design of experiment approach to optimize hydrophobic fabric treatments. Polymers, 12(9), 2131. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12092131
40.
RoyA. L.BhattacharyyaT. K. (2015). Design, fabrication and characterization of high performance SOI MEMS piezoresistive accelerometers. Microsyst Technol, 21, 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-013-1904-y
41.
SappatiK. K.BhadraS. (2018). Piezoelectric polymer and paper substrates: A review. Sensors, 18(11), 3605. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18113605
42.
ŠormM.ŠtulíkJ.KřenekT., et al. (2023). Carbon Nanotubes Decorated with Palladium Nanoparticles for Hydrogen Detection. 46th International Spring Seminar on Electronics Technology (ISSE), Timisoara, Romania.
43.
TangX.HaddadP.-A.MagerN., et al. (2019). Chemically deposited palladium nanoparticles on graphene for hydrogen sensor applications. Sci Rep, 9, 3653. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40257-7
44.
TianJ.LiG.HeW., et al. (2023). Insight into the dynamic adsorption behavior of graphene oxide multichannel architecture toward contaminants. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 53, 124–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2021.12.029
45.
TinssonW. (2010). Plans d’expérience: constructions et analyses statistiques. Springer Science & Business Media.
