Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This investigation aims to explore users’ accuracy in identifying computer mice designed with the golden ratio and their aesthetic preferences, with a specific focus on gender differences. First, the study used a database of 233 Genius brand mice and selected five samples with length-to-width ratios ranging from 1.42 to 1.78. A total of 99 university students (62 females and 37 males) participated in absolute and relative judgment tests. Results showed that most participants failed to correctly identify the mouse with a ratio closest to the golden ratio (approximately 1:1.62), even when provided with 2D or 3D visual references. The chi-square test showed that the difference in recognition accuracy between males (32%) and females (34%) was not statistically significant (p = 0.34). In addition, there was no correlation between aesthetic preference and whether the mouse followed the golden ratio. These findings suggest that golden ratio design is neither easily recognizable nor a key factor in product preference, and designers need not overly rely on it to enhance product appeal. Finally, polynomial regression analysis was employed to investigate the effect of the ratio on the preferences of all participants. The model fit was very high (R² = 99.91%, p-value = 0.038), showing that the mouse ratio was associated with all participants’ preferences. According to the results, if a ratio/preference prediction system for mouse design is developed in the future, a mouse design with an aspect ratio of 1.5 to 1.56 can serve as an important reference indicator for preference prediction.

Keywords

Golden ratio mouse design recognition accuracy gender differences relative judgment absolute judgment prediction system

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Falbo

. The golden ratio—a contrary viewpoint. Coll Math J 2005; 36: 123–134.

Basak

. Golden ratio and Fibonacci sequence: universal footprints of the golden flow. TOJDAC 2022; 12: 1092–1107.

Roth

. Understanding architecture: its elements, history, and meaning. New York, NY: Routledge, 2018.

Reid

, et al. Impact of product design representation on customer judgment with associated eye gaze patterns. In: ASME 2012 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference . New York, NY, USA: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2012.

Wagner

Eckman

. Judging the attractiveness of product design: the effect of visual attributes and. Advances in Consumer Research 1994; 21: 560–564.

Sanders

McCormick

. Human factors in engineering and design. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education, 1993.

Akhtaruzzaman

Shafie

. Geometrical substantiation of Phi, the golden ratio and the baroque of nature, architecture, design and engineering. Int J Arts 2011; 1: 1–22.

Acharjee

. Beauty of “Golden Ratio” in paintings, architecture, music, nature and technology. 11. 2019.

McWhinnie

. A review of selected research on the golden section hypothesis. Vis Arts Res 1987; 13: 73–84.

10.

Tractinsky

, et al. Exploring the aesthetic effects of the golden ratio in the design of interactive products. In: AMCIS 2013 Americas conference on information systems, Vol. 2 . Atlanta, GA, USA: Association for Information Systems, 2013, pp.1585–1594.

11.

Jung

Badke-Schaub

. The impact of aesthetic preference in product design-golden ratio and Korean's preference proportion. Arch Des Res 2017; 30: 5–14.

12.

Nikolic

Cosic

Pecujlija

, A, et al. The effect of the “golden ratio” on consumer behaviour. Afr J Bus Manag 2011; 5: 8347.

13.

Avramović

Vladić

Kašiković

, et al. Aplicability of golden ratio rule in modern product design. J Graph Eng Des 2014; 4: 29–36.

14.

Zhang

Xue

. Application of design geometry in minimalist style product design. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng 2019; 573: 012100.

15.

Chen

, et al. HDPS: Heart disease prediction system. In 2011 Computing in Cardiology. IEEE; 2011.

16.

Dragulescu

Albu

. Expert system for medical predictions. In 2007 4th International Symposium on Applied Computational Intelligence and Informatics. IEEE; 2007.

17.

Tyagi

, et al. Interactive thyroid disease prediction system using machine learning technique. In 2018 Fifth International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Grid Computing (PDGC). IEEE; 2018.

18.

Fumo

Biswas

. Regression analysis for prediction of residential energy consumption. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2015; 47: 332–343.

19.

Suffian

MDM

Ibrahim

. A prediction model for system testing defects using regression analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1401.5830. 2014.

20.

Chong

Abdul

AAR

Harun

, et al. Application of multiple linear regression, central composite design, and ANFIS models in dye concentration measurement and prediction using plastic optical fiber sensor. Measurement 2015; 74: 78–86.

21.

Asghar

Rahman

Kundi

, et al. Development of stock market trend prediction system using multiple regression. Comput Math Organ Theory 2019; 25: 271–301.

22.

Kirby

, et al. Development of an accelerometer-based surface roughness prediction system in turning operations using multiple regression techniques. J Ind Technol 2004; 20: 4.

23.

Min

Bai

Guo

, et al. Estimating summertime precipitation from Himawari-8 and global forecast system based on machine learning. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 2018; 57: 2557–2570.

24.

Gouarir

Martínez-Arellano

Terrazas

, et al. In-process tool wear prediction system based on machine learning techniques and force analysis. Procedia CIRP 2018; 77: 501–504.

25.

Chen

C-H

Hwang

Kung

. Travel time prediction system based on data clustering for waste collection vehicles. IEICE Trans Inf Syst 2019; 102: 1374–1383.

26.

Xing

, et al. Product design award prediction modeling: design visual aesthetic quality assessment via DCNNs. IEEE Access 2020; 8: 211028–211047.

27.

Chen

C-H

Yan

. An in-process customer utility prediction system for product conceptualisation. Expert Syst Appl 2008; 34: 2555–2567.

28.

Wang

, et al. Prediction of product design decision making: an investigation of eye movements and EEG features. Adv Eng Inf 2020; 45: 101095.

29.

Cong

Zheng

Bian

, et al. A machine learning-based iterative design approach to automate user satisfaction degree prediction in smart product-service system. Comput Ind Eng 2022; 165: 107939.

30.

Chahal

Addula

Jain

, et al. Systematic analysis based on conflux of machine learning and internet of things using bibliometric analysis. J Intell Systnternet of Things 2024; 13: 196–224.

Ratio preference prediction system for mouse design: Insights from golden ratio and gender differences

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References