The current evaluation structure of the effectiveness of cost management strategy is generally one-way, and the evaluation scope is relatively fixed, which leads to the decline of the utility value of the model evaluation. Therefore, the design and analysis of the evaluation model of the effectiveness of enterprise financial investment cost management strategy is proposed. According to the actual evaluation needs and standards, the cost evaluation index parameters are set, and the EVA effectiveness evaluation sequence is designed. Promote flexible and active assessment scope, construct multi-level fuzzy assessment structure, and use risk cross control to realize the design of effectiveness assessment model. The final test results show that the final evaluation utility value of the model exceeds 90% for the three sets of cost management strategic plans. This high value indicates that the model is highly pertinent and stable when it comes to measuring management strategies. Additionally, it broadens the evaluation scope to some degree, enhances the control over evaluation errors, and thus possesses practical application value.
XieGWangXJinX. Research on investment evaluation strategy of distribution network focusing on efficiency and benefit. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci2021; 657: 012084.
2.
TangXSongXZengY, et al.Evaluation and spatio-temporal evolution of forest ecological security in the Yangtze river economic belt. Acta Ecologica Sinica2021; 41: 1693–1704.
3.
HsuWHuangSHuynhNT. An evaluation model for foreign direct investment performance of free trade port zones. Promet-traffic & Transp: Sci J Traffic Transp Res2021; 33: 859–870.
4.
VempereLJasevičsAZemiteL,et al.Methodology for investment evaluation in electricity generation modules according to the requirements of the European union. Latvian J Phys Tech Sci2021; 58: 15–31.
5.
KatabiRJDimosoRL. The effect of small business characteristics on the choice of investment evaluation techniques for SMEs in Tanzania. IOSR J Bus Manage2021; 18: 11–18.
6.
YangL. The evaluation model of legal risk of enterprises’ foreign investment based on data mining. J Phys Conf Ser2021; 1744: 032175.
ZhaoLZhuTShiJ, et al.Green investment, financial efficiency, and sustainable development: dual perspectives of enterprise cost and government guidance. Appl Spatial Anal Policy2024; 17: 799–821.
9.
SpacesJOF. Retracted: enterprise management decision and financial management based on dynamic cost volume profit model. J Function Spaces2023; 2023(000): 1.
10.
ZhangJ. Research on project investment decision of feed enterprise based on financial perspective. China Feed2022; 1: 106–109.
11.
ZhangQY. Analysis on the development path of the combination of financial management and cost control of feed enterprises from the perspective of “Internet+”. China Feed2022; 22: 103–106.
12.
WangLZhengJWuD, et al.Research on the effect of R&D investment intensity and sales Expense on the performance of biomedical enterprises. Asian J Soc Pharm2023; 18: 326–334.
13.
BianJLShanYZhaoGY. Evaluation and analysis of environmental protection investment efficiency in China based on data envelopment analysis model. J Environ Protect Ecol2021; 22: 2701–2709.
14.
SaputroFHSoetomoMA. Monitoring & evaluation model framework for IT project management at PT. XYZ. ACMIT Proceedings2021; 6: 49–55.
15.
XueY. Evaluation analysis on industrial green total factor productivity and energy transition policy in resource-based region. Energy & Environment2022; 33: 419–434.
16.
CaiBXiaZLaiY, et al.Quantitative evaluation of the effects of different cost experience curve on total energy investment cost: endogenous VS exogenous. IOP Conf Ser: Earth and Environ Sci2021; 661: 012011.
17.
HasanMKTanakaTAliMR, et al.Harvester evaluation using real-time kinematic GNSS and hiring service model. AgriEngineering2021; 3: 363–382.
18.
NedeljkoviMPukaADoljanicaS, et al.Evaluation of rapeseed varieties using novel integrated fuzzy piprecia-fuzzy MABAC model. PloS One2021; 16: e0246857.
19.
YuCLiuY. A personalized mean-CVaR portfolio optimization model for individual investment. Math Problems in Eng2021; 2021: 1–12.
20.
LiKZhouFLiZ, et al.A semi-parametric ensemble model for profit evaluation and investment decisions in online consumer loans with prepayments. Appl Soft Comput2021; 107: 107485.
21.
HanJMaGYamS. Relative performance evaluation for dynamic contracts in a large competitive market. Eur J Oper Res2022; 302: 768–780.
22.
LiHYaoBYanX. Data-driven public R&D project performance evaluation: results from China. Sustainability2021; 13: 7147.
23.
WuT. Theoretical foundation and model construction of comprehensive evaluation of distribution network. IOP Conf Ser: Earth and Environ Sci2021; 631: 012125.
24.
YuJLinSHuangF, et al.Evaluation and analysis of total factor input and output of power grid enterprises under the new situation. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci2021; 680: 012046.
25.
WuPMaJGuoX. Efficiency evaluation and influencing factors analysis of fiscal and taxation policies: a method combining DEA-AHP and CD function. Ann Oper Res2022; 309: 325–345.
26.
ChenB. Public–private partnership infrastructure investment and sustainable economic development: an empirical study based on efficiency evaluation and spatial spillover in China. Sustainability2021; 13: 8146.
27.
GongZGuoKHeX. Corporate social responsibility based on radial basis function neural network evaluation model of low-carbon circular economy coupled development. Complexity2021; 2021: 5592569.
28.
ChenSYaoS. Evaluation of forestry ecological efficiency: a spatiotemporal empirical study based on China's provinces. Forests2021; 12: 142.
29.
MuellerT. Evaluation of printed wax pattern molds. Int Mag Invest Casting Inst2022; 35: 1–18.
30.
LuoXLinJLiY, et al.Research on capacity evaluation method of airdrop bundling and packaging based on queuing theory. Comput Simulat2022; 39: 56–59.
