There is a growing body of philosophical, legal, and empirical support for integrated preschool programs. Yet, many young children with moderate to severe disabilities are not successfully integrated into regular preschool classes. An impressive body of literature highlights the value of integration for children with disabilities. Unfortunately, much less information is available on specific strategies for accomplishing this goal. This may be due, in part, to the difficulty in operationalising educational policies such as least restrictive environment and integration. This paper identifies a continuum of instructional strategies that promote the entry of young children with moderate to severe disabilities into regular preschool classrooms. The continuum is based on the concept of ‘power.’ Power judgements assess the relationship between the cost of a strategy (e.g. staff time, extra resources, potential for negative side effect, etc.) and its potential benefit. Effective power judgements result in the use of strategies that are likely to produce the desired effect with the lowest expenditure to effort, resources, and disruption of teachers and children.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbertoP. & TroutmanA. (1982) Applied behavior analysis for teachers.Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Co.
2.
BaileyD.B. & WoleryM. (1992) Teaching infants and preschoolers with disabilities.New York, NY: Merrill.
3.
BaileyD.B. & WoleryM. (1984) Teaching infants and preschoolers with handicaps.Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Co.
4.
BanduraA. & WaltersR. (1963) Social learning and personality development.New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc.
5.
BerresM.S. & KnoblockP. (1987) Program models for mainstreaming: Integrating students with moderate to severe disabilities.Rockville, MD: Aspen.
6.
BloomB.S. (1964) Stability and change in human characteristics.New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
7.
BredekampS. (ed.) (1987) Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8.Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
8.
BrickerD. & WoodsCripe (1992) An activity-based approach to early intervention.Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Company.
9.
BrinkerR.P. & ThorpeM.E. (1984) Integration of severely handicapped students and the proportion of IEP objectives achieved. Exceptional Children, 51168–175.
10.
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas, 347 R.S. 483 (1954)
11.
CartaJ.J., SchwartzI.S., AtwaterJ.B. & McConnellS.R. (1991) Developmentally appropriate practice: Appraising its usefulness for young children with disabilities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 111–20.
12.
DanielR.R. v. State Board of Education F. 2d (5th Circuit, June 12, 1989)
13.
DoyleP.M., WoleryM., AultM.J. & GastD.L. (1988) System of least prompts: A literature review of procedural parameters. The Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 1328–40.
14.
GiangrecoM.F. & PutnamJ. (1991) Supporting the education of students with severe disabilities in regular education environments. In H L. Meyer, PechC., & BrownL. (eds), Critical issues in the lives of persons with severe disabilities.Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
15.
GoldM.W. (1976, October) Task analysis of a complex assembly task by the retarded blind. Exceptional Children, 78–84.
16.
GuralnickM. (1978) Early intervention and the integration of handicapped and nonhandicapped children.Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
17.
GuralnickM. & BennettP.C. (1987) The effectiveness of early intervention for at risk and handicapped children.New York, NY: Academic Press.
18.
HansonM.J. (1984) A typical infant development. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
19.
KatzL. (1988, October) The disposition to learn. Principal, 14–17.
20.
KellerF.S. & SchoenfeldW.N. (1950) Principles of psychology.New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
21.
McDonnellA. & HardmanM. (1988) A synthesis of best practice guidelines for early childhood services. Journal of Early Intervention, 12328–341.
22.
OdomS. & McEvoyM. (1990) Mainstreaming at the preschool level: Potential barriers and tasks for the field. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 1048–61.
23.
PetersonN.L. (1987) Early intervention for handicapped and at-risk children111–112. Denver, CO: Love Publishing Company.
24.
PiagetJ. (1950) The psychology of intelligence.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Public Law 93–112 (Section 504 of Rehabilitation Act of 1973)
27.
Public Law 94–142 (Education of All Handicapped Children Act of 1975)
28.
Public Law 99–457 (Education of All Handicapped Children Act of 1986)
29.
Repp, A.C. (1990) Nonaversive and aversive interventions: Overview. In ReppA.C. & SinghN. N. (eds.), Perspectives in the use of nonaversive and aversive interventions for persons with disabilities17–29. Sycamore, IL: Sycamore Publishing Co.
30.
RobertsonJ., AlperS., SchlossP.J. & WisniewskiL. (in press) Teaching self-catherisation skills to a child with myelomeningocele in a preschool setting. Journal of Early Intervention.
31.
SainatoD. & LyonS. (1989) Promoting successful mainstreaming transitions for handicapped preschool children. Journal of Early Intervention, 13305–314.
32.
SassoG.M., SimpsonR.L. & NovakC.G. (1985) Procedures for facilitating integration of autistic children in public school settings. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 5233–246.
33.
SchlossP., & SedlackR. (1986) Instructional methods for students with learning and behavior problems.Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
34.
SchlossP.J. & SmithM.A. (in press) Applied Behavior Analysis in the Classroom.Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
35.
Siegel-CauseyE. & GuessD. (1989) Enhancing nonsymbolic communication interactions among learners with severe disabilities.Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
36.
SkinnerB.F. (1933) ‘Resistance to extincting’ in the process of conditioning. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 9420–429.
37.
SkinnerB.F. (1938) The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis.New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
38.
SkinnerB.F. (1953) Science and human behavior.New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.
39.
SnellM. & BrownF. (1993) Instructional planning and implementation. In SnellM.E. (ed.), Instruction of students with severe disabilities, 99–151. New York: Merrill.
40.
VincentL.J., SalisburyC., WalterG., BrownP., GruenewaldL.J., & PowersM. (1980) Program evaluation and curriculum development in early childhood special education. In WayneS., WilcoxB. & BrownL. (eds) Methods of instruction for severely handicapped students303–328. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
