THE SEARCH TO IMPROVE achievement in literacy is worldwide. Success is seen as an important social and cultural marker. Contemporary scholars discuss the importance of children's social interactions as they co-construct literacy learning. As early childhood educators play a role in children's communities, their knowledge and literacy teaching and learning approaches are important, and the focus of this paper. Practitioner research, using a literacy environment rating scale and photostories, was used to focus on change in early literacy environments. I share the methods, processes, strategies and approaches for strengthening practice to offer support for others planning and implementing practitioner research or early literacy-focused projects. Action research, accompanied by the use of the mediating artefacts of the scale and photostories, was found to be a useful methodology for change in literacy learning environments, but was not without challenges.
BarrowR., & WoodsR. (1975). An introduction to philosophy in education (4th ed.) London, UK: Routledge.
3.
CarrW., & KemmisS. (2009). Educational action research: A critical approach. In NoffkeS. & SomekhB. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of educational action research (pp. 74–84). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
4.
Cochran-SmithM., & LytleS. (2009). Teacher research as stance. In NoffkeS. & SomekhB. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of educational action research (pp. 39–49). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
5.
ComberB., & KamlerB. (2007). Getting out of deficit: Pedagogies of reconnection. Teaching Education, 15(3), 293–310.
6.
ElliottJ. (2008). Assessing the quality of action research. In FurlongJ. & OanceaA. (Eds.), Assessing quality in applied practice-based research in education (pp. 109–126). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
7.
FellowesJ., & OakleyG. (2010). Language, literacy and early childhood education.South Melbourne, VIC: Oxford University Press.
8.
FenechM. (2011). An analysis of the conceptualisation of ‘quality’ in early childhood education and care empirical research: Promoting ‘blind spots’ as foci for future research. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 12(2), 102–117.
9.
FreireP. (1973). Education for critical consciousness.London, UK: Sheed and Ward.
10.
GaldamesX. (2011). Chilean early childhood education as a promoter of social justice: Challenging neo-colonial trajectories of knowledge. International Studies in Education, 12, 106–124.
11.
GrammatikopoulosV., GregoriadisA., TsigilisN., & ZachopoulouE. (2014). Parental conceptions of quality in Greek early childhood education. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 22(1), 134–148. doi: 10.1080/1350293X.2012.738868
12.
Groundwater-SmithS., & MocklerN. (2008). Ethics in practitioner research: An issue of quality. In FurlongJ. & OanceaA. (Eds.), Assessing quality in applied and practice-based research in education (pp.79–92). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
13.
GriffithsM. (2009). Action research for/as/mindful of social justice. In NoffkeS. & SomekhB. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of educational action research (pp. 85–98). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
14.
HarmsT., & CliffordR. (1980). Early childhood environment rating scale.New York, NY: New York Teachers College Press.
15.
HarmsT., CliffordR., & CryerD. (1998). Early childhood environment rating scale (rev. ed.). New York, NY: New York Teachers College Press.
16.
HillS. (2011). Towards ecologically valid assessment in early literacy. Early Child Development and Care, 181(2), 165–180.
17.
MacNaughtonG., & HughesP. (2009). Doing action research in early childhood studies.Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
18.
MakinL., HaydenJ., HollandA., ArthurL., BeecherB., Jones DiazC., & McNaughtM. (1999). Mapping literacy practices in early childhood services.Sydney, NSW: New South Wales Department of Education and Training and New South Wales Department of Community Services.
19.
New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.
20.
NewmanL. (2012). Using the Revised Early Childhood Environment Language and Literacy Scale. Chile (R.ECELLS. cl) for pedagogical change within action research frameworks.Sydney, NSW: University of Western Sydney Literacy Connections Research in Practice Series.
21.
NewmanL., ArthurL., & WoodrowC. (2010). Escala revisada de lenguaje y literacidad en el medio ambiente de la primera infancia. Chile. Protocolo para evaluación e investigación [Revised early childhood language and literacy scale. Chile. Protocol for evaluation and research]. Sydney, NSW: Literacy connections: Linking children, families and communities, University of Western Sydney.
22.
NewmanL., & MowbrayS. (2012). ‘We were expected to be equal’: Teachers and academics sharing professional learning through practitioner inquiry. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 18(4), 455–468.
23.
NewmanL., & WoodrowC. (Eds.). (2015). Practitioner research in early childhood. International issues and perspectives.London, UK: Sage Publications. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1153.0728
NeylonG. (2014). An analysis of Irish pre-school practice and pedagogy using the early childhood environmental four curricular subscales. Irish Educational Studies, 33(1), 99–116.
26.
NoffkeS., & SomekhB. (2009). The Sage handbook of educational action research.Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
27.
OlivierT., WoodL., & de LangeN. (2009). Picturing hope. In the face of poverty, as seen through the eyes of teachers.Cape Town, South Africa: Juta.
28.
PerezB. (Ed.). (1998). Sociocultural contexts of language and literacy.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29.
PerezB. (Ed.). (2004). Sociocultural contexts of language and literacy (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
30.
PerryK. (2012). What is literacy?: A critical overview of sociocultural perspectives. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 8(1), 51–71.
31.
PonteP., & RönnermanK. (2009). Pedagogy as human science, building and action research: Swedish and Dutch reflections. Educational Action Research, 17(1), 155–167.
32.
Siraj-BlatchfordI., SylvaK., GildenR., & BellD. (2002). Researching effective pedagogy in the early years. A UK ECERS network resource. London, UK: Department for Education and Skills. Retrieved from www.ecersuk.org/4.html.
UK ECERS Network. (n.d.). ECERS-R, ECERS-E and ITERS-R. Retrieved from www.ecersuk.org/4.html.
36.
University of Western Sydney (UWS). (2009). Revised Early Childhood Environment Language and Literacy Scale. Literacy Connections: Futuro Infantil Hoy. Sydney, NSW: University of Western Sydney.
37.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind and society.Cambridge, MA: Macmillan McGraw Hill.
38.
WhiteheadM. (2007). Developing language and literacy with young children (3rd ed.). London, UK: Sage Publications.
39.
WinchG., JohnstonR., MarchP., LjungdahlL., & HollidayM. (2011). Literacy. Reading, writing and children's literature (4th ed.). South Melbourne, VIC: Oxford University Press.
40.
Ying HuB., VongK., ChenY., & LiK. (2015). Expert practitioners' views about the Chinese early childhood environment rating scale. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 23(2), 229–249.
