THE TRANSITION TO FORMAL schooling is a significant milestone for young children and their families. Congruence between an early childhood setting and school experience is known to impact on children's positive start to school. Despite policy efforts at the Victorian state level, preschool educators and Foundation teachers do not have a strong understanding of the curriculum, pedagogical and assessment practices used in the alternate setting. This paper reports on the ‘Alliance Project’ that sought to support preschool educators and Foundation teachers to work cooperatively to better understand each other's practices. Drawing from sociocultural theory, the Alliance Project employed an interventionist methodology to work with preschool educator and Foundation teacher pairings on a joint planning initiative. Participants on the Alliance Project gained increased familiarity with the alternate setting's curriculum, pedagogy and assessment practices, and an increased capacity to work cooperatively across both settings to address the needs of transitioning children.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArnupM. (2014). Building connections around transition: Partnerships and resources for inclusion. In PerryB., DockettS. & PetriwskyjA. (Eds.), Transitions to school: Research, policy and practice (pp. 261–276). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
2.
AuerbachC., & SilversteinL. (2003). Qualitative data. An introduction to coding and analysis.New York, NY: New York University Press.
Australian Government Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). (2009). Belonging, Being & Becoming: The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia.Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.
5.
BoyleT., & PetriwskyjA. (2014). Transitions to school: Reframing professional relationships. Early Years: An International Research Journal, 34(4), 392–404.
6.
Department of Education and Early Childhood Education (DEECD). (2009). Transition: A positive start to school. A guide for families, early childhood services, outside school hours care services and schools.Melbourne, VIC: Early Childhood Strategy Division Office of Children and Portfolio Coordination.
7.
Department of Education and Early Childhood Development (DEECD)., & Victorian Curriculum Assessment Authority (VCAA). (2011). Victorian Early Years Learning Development Framework. For All Children from Birth to Eight Years.Melbourne, VIC: Victorian Government.
DockettS., & PerryB. (2014). Continuity of learning: A resource to support effective transition to school and school age care.Canberra, ACT: Australian Government Department of Education.
10.
EastmanC., NewtonB., RajkovicM., & ValentineK. (2010). Linking Schools and Early Years project evaluation: Data collection round 2.Sydney, NSW: Social Policy Research Centre, University of New South Wales.
11.
EdwardsA. (2000). Research and practice: Is there a dialogue? In PennH. (Ed.), Early childhood services: Theory, policy and practice (pp. 184–199). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
12.
EdwardsA. (2001). Researching pedagogy: A sociocultural agenda. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 9(2), 161–186.
13.
EdwardsS., & NuttallJ. (2009). Introduction. Professional learning in early childhood settings. In EdwardsS. & NuttallJ. (Eds.), Professional learning in early childhood settings (pp. 1–8). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publications.
14.
EngestromY., & MiettinenR. (1999). Introduction. In EngestromY., MiettinenR. & PunamäkiR-L. (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 1–18). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15.
FabianH. (2013). Towards successful transitions. In MargettsK. & KienigA. (Eds.), International perspectives on transition to school (pp. 45–55). Milton Park, UK: Routledge.
16.
HirstM., JervisN., VisagieK., SojoV., & CavanaghS. (2011). Transition to primary school: A review of the literature.Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.
17.
HunkinE. (2014). We're offering true play-based learning: Teacher perspectives on educational dis/continuity in the early years. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 39(2), 30–35.
18.
KarikoskiH. (2008). Starting school as an ecological transition: Parents as informants in the transit of children from pre-school to school environments, Vol 100. Oulu, Finland: Acta Universitatis Ouluensis E, Oulu University.
19.
KarilaK., & RantavuoriL. (2014). Discourses at the boundary spaces: Developing a fluent transition from preschool to school. Early Years: An International Research Journal, 34(5), 377–391.
20.
KozulinA. (2003). Psychological tools and mediated learning. In KozulinA., GindisB., AgeyevV. & MillerS. (Eds.), Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context (pp. 15–39). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
LoCasale-CrouchJ., MashburnA. J., DownerJ. T., & PiantaR. C. (2008). Pre-kindergarten teachers' use of transition practices and children's adjustment to kindergarten. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23(1), 124–139.
22.
MaloneyC., & KonzaD. (2011). A case study of teachers' professional learning: Becoming a community of professional learning or not? Issues in Educational Research, 21(1), 75–87.
23.
MargettsK. (1999, July). Transition to school: Looking forward. Paper presented at the AECA National Conference, Darwin, Northern Territory.
24.
MargettsK. (2002). Transition to school—Complexity and diversity. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 10(2), 103–114.
25.
MatusovE. (1996). Intersubjectivity without agreement. Mind, Culture and Activity, 3(1), 25–45.
26.
MatusovE. (2001). Intersubjectivity as a way of informing teaching design for a community of learners. Teacher and Teacher Education, 17(4), 383–402.
27.
NolanA., HammC., McCartinJ., & HuntJ. (2009). Outcomes and indicators of a positive start to school.Melbourne, VIC: Victoria University.
28.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2006). Starting Strong II: Early childhood education and care. Summary in English. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/edu/school/37519079.pdf.
29.
PetersS. (2010). Shifting the lens: Re-framing learners and learning during the transition from early childhood education in New Zealand. In Jindal-SnapeD. (Ed.), Educational transitions: Moving stories from around the world (pp. 8–84). Oxford, UK: Routledge.
30.
PopeC., ZieblandS., & MaysN. (2000). Analysing qualitative data. British Medical Journal, 320(7227), 114–116.
31.
RogoffB. (2003). The cultural nature of development.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
32.
SerryT., ImmsC., FroudeE., JoffeB., HeineC., & MerriganC. (2014). Preparatory teachers' perceptions of school readiness: A survey of Victorian teachers, Australian Educational Researcher, 41, 109–124.
33.
SmartD., SansonA., BaxterJ., EdwardsB., & HayesA. (2008). Home-to-school transition for financially disadvantaged children: Summary report.Sydney, NSW: The Smith Family and Australian Institute of Family Studies.
34.
StetsenkoA. (2011). Darwin and Vygotsky on development: An exegesis on human nature. In KontopodisM., WulfC. & FichtnerB. (Eds.), Children, development and education. Cultural, historical and anthropological perspectives (pp. 25–41). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
35.
Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority (VCAA). (2007). Victorian essentials learning standards: Level 1, (Prep). Retrieved 18 November, 2015, from http://ausvels.vcaa.vic.edu.au/Level1.
36.
VygotskyL. S. (1997). Research method. In RieberR.W. (Ed.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (Vol. 4). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
37.
WertschJ. (2007). Mediation. In DanielsH., ColeM. & WertschJ. (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 178–193). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
