PLAYING IN CUBBY HOUSES has been a long tradition with children. When a cubby house is given sustainable lifestyle components—that is, converted into a ‘Cool Cubby’—how does this influence awareness about sustainability? Since 2009 there have been significant innovations in Australia to promote sustainable practices, and the Cool Cubbies Project is a small-scale example of such an initiative. Giving cubby houses sustainable components is innovative, and represents a play-based approach to teaching, in line with early childhood principles of learning. This paper reports on an evaluation of the Cool Cubbies Project (Rous Water, 2015). Cubby houses in five preschools were converted into Cool Cubbies by adding features of sustainable living, including biodiversity, water, waste and energy. An evaluation of the impact of Cool Cubbies raised awareness about sustainable living with young children, educators, families and community. This is a key example of developing resources to support a more sustainable future, through the act of creating a learning resource grounded in sustainable practices for children's play.
BoydW. (2014). Parents' choices of child care in Australia. New Zealand Research in Early Childhood Education Journal, 17, 51–69.
3.
ChawlaL. (1999). Life paths into effective environmental action. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31(1), 15–26. doi: 10.1080/00958969909598628
4.
Cutter-MackenzieA., EdwardsS., MooreD., & BoydW. (2014). Young children's play and environmental education in early childhood education.London, UK: Springer.
5.
DavisJ. (2005). Educating for sustainability in the early years. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 21, 47–55.
6.
DavisJ. (2010). Early childhood education for sustainability. Journal of Action Research Today in Early Childhood, January, 35–44.
7.
DavisJ., MillerM., BoydW., & GibsonM. (2008). The impact and potential of water education in EC care and education centres.Kelvin Grove, QLD: QUT Publications.
8.
Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). (2009). Belonging, Being & Becoming: The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia.Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.
9.
HartP. (2003). Teachers' thinking in environmental education.Pieterlen, Switzerland: Peter Lang Publishing Inc.
10.
HeckmanJ. (2006). Investing in disadvantaged young children is an economically efficient policy. Paper presented at the Iowa Business Council, Early Childhood Summit. Retrieved from www.iowabusinesscouncil.org/en/resources/publications.
11.
KearsleyG., & ShneidermanB. (1998). Engagement theory: A framework for technology-based teaching and learning. Educational Technology, 38(5), 20.
12.
KulttiA., & Pramling SamuelssonI. (2014). Guided participation and communication practices in multilingual toddler groups. In HarrisonL. & SumsionJ. (Eds.), Lived spaces of infant–toddler education and care: Exploring diverse perspectives on theory, research and practice (pp. 147–159). New York, NY: Springer.
13.
MillerM., DavisJ., BoydW., & DanbyS. (2014). Learning about and taking action for the environment: Experiences of children and teachers who participated in a preschool water education program. Children, Youth and Environments, 24(3), 43–57. doi: 10.7721/chilyoutenvi.24.3.0043
