WE EXAMINE THE CHALLENGES OF pronouns and noun groups in the Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority's (ACARA) National Assessment Program—Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) Numeracy Year 3 Example test (ACARA, 2015a). Framed by discourses of Literacy as a General Capability (ACARA, 2015b) in the Australian Curriculum: Mathematics (ACARA, 2015c), the pronouns and noun groups used in the Example test are mapped onto the Australian Curriculum: English Content Descriptions (ACARA, 2015d). The findings are that some of the pronouns and noun groups used in the Example test are more complex than what Year 3 children are expected to achieve in the Australian Curriculum: English. We thus stress the need for early years teachers of mathematics to account for the unique mathematical register of written mathematics problems so that young children are not only prepared for high-stakes written numeracy assessments, but are also enabled as a numerically literate citizen.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbelK., & ExleyB. (2008). Using Halliday's functional grammar to examine early years worded mathematics texts. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 31(3), 227–241.
BartonB. (2009). The language of mathematics: Telling mathematical tales.New York: Springer.
8.
ChapmanA. (1997). Towards a model of language shifts in mathematics learning. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 9(2), 152–173.
9.
DennenV. (2004). Cognitive apprenticeship in educational practice: Research on scaffolding, modeling, mentoring, and coaching as instructional strategies. In JonassenD.H. (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed., p. 815). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10.
DerewiankaB. (2011). A new grammar companion for teachers.Sydney: Primary English Teaching Association.
11.
DolanR., MurrayE., & StangmanN. (2006). Mathematics instruction and assessment for middle school students in the margins: Students with learning disabilities, students with mild mental retardation, and students who are English language learners.Wakefield, MA: New England Association Grant Task Module.
12.
DoyleK. (2007). The teacher, the tasks: Their role in students' mathematical literacy. In WatsonJ. & BeswickK. (Eds.), Proceedings 30th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia—Mathematics: Essential research, essential practice (pp. 246–254). Hobart, Tas.: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
13.
EnglishL., & WattersJ. (2005). Mathematical modelling in the early school years. Mathematical Education Research Journal, 16(3), 58–79.
14.
ExleyB., & SinghP. (2011). Social Studies disciplinary knowledge: An Australian case study of tensions between State Curriculum and National Assessment in disadvantaged school communities. In ChristieF. & MatonK. (Eds.), Disciplinarity: Functional linguistic and sociological perspectives (pp. 237–256). London: Continuum.
15.
ExleyB., & WilsonG. (2012). Knowing about the English language: ‘A wrinkle in time’. Practically Primary, 17(1), 4–8.
16.
GrimmK. (2008). Longitudinal associations between reading and mathematics achievement. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33(3), 410–426.
17.
HallidayM. (1978). Language as a social semiotic.London: Edward Arnold.
18.
HallidayM., & HasanR. (1976). Cohesion in English.London: Longman.
19.
HallidayM., & MatthiessenC. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Arnold.
20.
LeachS., & BowlingJ. (2000). A classroom research project: ESL students and the language of mathematics. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 5(1), 24–27.
21.
LowrieT., & DiezmannC. (2009). National numeracy tests: A graphic tells a thousand words. Australian Journal of Education, 53(2), 141–158.
22.
LukeA., & WoodsA. (2007). Accountability as testing: Are there lessons about assessment and outcomes to be learnt from no child left behind? Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 6(3), 11–19.
23.
Ministerial Council for Education, Early Childhood Development and Youth Affairs (MCEECDYA). (2010). Year 3 test administration handbook. 2010 National Assessment Program Literacy and Numeracy. Retrieved 10 January, 2012, from www.qsa.qld.edu.au/downloads/early_middle/naplan_yr3_test_admin_guide_10.pdf.
24.
MonroeW., & EnglehartM. (1931). A critical summary of research relating to the teaching of Arithmetic. Bureau of Educational Research Bulletin, 58, University of Illinois.
25.
ParkinB., & HayesJ. (2006). Scaffolding the language of maths. Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 14(1), 23–35.
26.
SchoenfeldA. H. (2002). A highly interactive discourse structure. Social Constructivist Teaching, 9, 131–169.
27.
UnsworthL. (2001). Teaching multiliteracies across the curriculum: Changing contexts of text and image in classroom practice.Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
