THE SWEDISH PRESCHOOL CURRICULUM was revised in 2010 and introduced more emphasis on literacy development for very young children. In exploring how educators approach and understand these changes to the curriculum, we drew on focus group interviews with 10 preschool teams working with toddlers. As the educators talked about their work with written language with toddlers, they identified a range of activities from their everyday practice that categorised written language in various ways. As well as reporting on what the teachers said, this paper also shows how they participated in the focus groups, showing hesitancy in some cases and using categorisations, contrasts and active voicing as they shared their perspectives. The study's findings suggest that early childhood educators would benefit from engaging more deeply in theories of literacy that align with early childhood education. This will enable them to theorise from their practice and to articulate their understandings and practice within their teams and to others.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AtkinsonJ.M., & HeritageJ. (Eds.). (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2.
BezemerJ., & KressG. (2008). Writing in multimodal texts: A social semiotic account of designs for learning. Written Communication, 25(2), 166–195.
3.
BroströmS. (2012). Curriculum in preschool. Adjustment or possible liberation. Nordisk Barnehaveforskning [Nordic Early Childhood Education Research], 11, 1–14.
4.
DahlbergG., & MossP. (2007). Ethics and politics in early childhood education.London: RoutledgeFalmer.
5.
DanbyS., & DavidsonC. (2007). Young children using language to negotiate their social worlds. In MakinL., Jones DiazC. & McLachlanC. (Eds.), Literacies in childhood: Changing views, challenging practice (2nd ed., pp. 118–132). Port Melbourne, Vic.: Elsevier.
6.
DysonA. H. (2010). Writing childhoods under construction: Revisioning ‘copying’ in early childhood. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 10(1), 7–31.
7.
EdwardsD. (1991). Categories are for talking: On the cognitive and discursive bases of categorization. Theory Psychology, 1(4), 515–542.
8.
EikL. T. (2014). Ny i profesjonen. En observasjons- og intervjustudie av førskolelæreres videre kvalifisering det første året i yrket [New in their profession: Further professional qualification processes among newly qualified kindergarten teachers during their first year] (Published dissertation). Det utdanningsvitenskapelige fakultet, Universitetet i Oslo [Faculty of Education, University of Oslo], Oslo, Norway.
9.
GarfinkelH. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Inc.
10.
GeeJ. P. (2008). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourse.London: Routledge.
11.
GillenJ., & HallN. (2013). The emergence of early childhood literacy. In HallN., LarsonJ. & MarshJ. (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood literacy (pp. 3–18). London: Sage Publications.
12.
HensvoldI. (2011). A changed professional identity: Preschools teachers' narratives twelve years after examination. Nordisk Barnehaveforskning [Nordic Early Childhood Education Research], 4(1), 1–16.
13.
HeritageJ. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology.Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
14.
HesterS., & EglinP. (1997). Culture in action: Studies in membership categorization analysis.Washington, DC: University Press of America.
15.
HoltE. (1996). Reporting on talk: The use of direct reported speech in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 29(3), 219–245.
16.
HvitS. (2014). Literacy events in toddler groups: Preschool educators' talk about their work with literacy among toddlers. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 0, 1–20.
17.
JayyusiL. (1984). Categorization and the moral order.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
18.
KressG. (1997). Before writing: Rethinking the paths to literacy.London: Routledge.
19.
LancasterL. (2001). Staring at the page: The functions of gaze in a young child's interpretation of symbolic forms. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 1(2), 131–152.
20.
LancasterL. (2003). Moving into literacy: How it all begins. In HallN., LarsonJ. & MarshJ. (Eds.), Handbook of Early Childhood Literacy (pp. 313–329). London: Sage Publications.
21.
MackenzieN. M., & VeresovN. (2013). How drawing can support writing acquisition: Text construction in early writing from a Vygotskian perspective. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 38(4), 22–29.
22.
O'GormanL., & HardL. (2013). Looking back and looking forward: Exploring distributed leadership with Queensland Prep teachers. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 38(3), 77–84.
23.
PahlK., & RowsellJ. (2006). Travel notes from the new literacy studies: Instances of practice.Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
24.
PotterJ., & HepburnA. (2005). Qualitative interviews in psychology. In WilligC. & HallwayW. (Eds.), Handbook of quality research in psychology (pp. 104–119). London: Routledge.
25.
PetriwskyjA., O'GormanL., & TurunenT. (2013). The interface of the national Australian curriculum and the pre-Year 1 class in school: Exploring tensions. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 38(1), 16–22.
26.
Pramling SamuelssonI., & SheridanS. (2010). A turning-point or a backward slide: The challenge facing the Swedish preschool today. Early Years: An International Research Journal, 30(3), 219–227.
