THIS ARTICLE IDENTIFIES AND examines a critical juncture in Australian early childhood education and care (ECEC) policy history in order to understand the contemporary Australian ECEC policy landscape, especially in relation to the way in which quality in child care is mandated and understood. In policy, critical junctures are path-breaking policy developments that have lasting impacts (Gal & Bargal, 2002; Pierson, 2004). This article illustrates how examining critical junctures can deepen understandings of processes that contribute to transformative policy shifts. In doing so, we illuminate ways in which contemporary contexts have been shaped by past policy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (1988). Commercial long day care Australia (No. 4414.0). Canberra: Commonwealth Government.
2.
Australian Children's Education and Care Quality Authority (ACECQA). (2012). National Quality Framework. Retrieved 24 September, 2014, from www.acecqa.gov.au/national-quality-framework.
3.
Australian Federation of Child Care Associations. (1992). Private child care industry report on the proposed accreditation process and link to fee relief developed by the Interim National Accreditation Council. Unpublished report.
4.
BacchiC. (2009). Analysing policy: What's the problem represented to be?Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson Education.
5.
BallS. (2008). The education debate.Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.
6.
BrennanD. (1998). The politics of Australian child care: Philanthropy to feminism and beyond.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
BrennanD., & AdamsonE. (2012). Early childhood education and care policy. In BowesJ., GraceR. & HodgeK. (Eds.), Children, families and communities (4th ed., pp. 255–270). Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
9.
BrennanD., CassB., HimmelweitS., & SzebehelyM. (2012). The marketisation of care: Rationales and consequences in Nordic and liberal care regimes. Journal of European Social Policy, 22(4), 377–91.
10.
BrennanD., & O'DonnellC. (1986). Caring for Australia's children: Political and industrial issues in child care.Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
11.
CapocciaG., & KelemenR. D. (2007). The study of critical junctures: Theory, narrative, and counterfactuals in historical institutionalism. World Politics, 59(3), 341–369.
12.
CastelR. (1994). ‘Problematization’ as a mode of reading history. In GoldsteinJ. (Ed.), Foucault and the writing of history (pp. 237–252). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
13.
ClevelandG., & KrashinskyM. (2009). The nonprofit advantage: Producing quality in thick and thin child care markets. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 28(3), 440–462.
14.
Committee of Child Care Industry Representatives. (1990). National accreditation system for child care services: Report to Minister for Aged, Family and Health Services, Hon Peter Staples MP.Canberra: Commonwealth Government.
15.
Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). (2010). State of child care in Australia.Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
16.
FoucaultM. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge.London: Routledge.
17.
FoucaultM. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison.London: Penguin Books.
18.
GalJ., & BargalD. (2002). Critical junctures, labor movements and the development of occupational welfare in Israel. Social Problems, 49(3), 432–454.
19.
GrieshaberS. (2002). A national system of childcare accreditation: Quality assurance or a technique of normalization? In CannellaG.S. & KincheloeJ.L. (Eds.), Kidworld: Childhood studies, global perspectives and education (pp. 161–180). New York: Peter Lang.
20.
HarrisN. (2008). Women's reflections on choosing quality long day care in a regional community. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 33(3), 42–49.
HoganJ., & DoyleD. (2007). The importance of ideas: An a priori critical juncture framework. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 40(4), 883–910.
23.
HoganJ., & DoyleD. (2009). A comparative framework: How broadly applicable is a ‘rigorous’ critical junctures framework? Acta Politica, 44(2), 211–240.
24.
Interim National Childcare Accreditation Council. (June, 1992). Quality affordable childcare Australia-wide: Interim report.Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
25.
IshimineK. (2011). Quality in early childhood education and care: A case study of disadvantage. The Australian Educational Researcher, 38(3), 257–274.
26.
Lady Gowrie Child Centre (Melbourne). (1987). Aspects of quality day care: An evaluative summary of recent literature.North Carlton, Vic.: The Lady Gowrie Child Centre (Melbourne).
27.
LloydE., & PennH. (Eds.). (2012). Childcare markets: Can they deliver an equitable service?Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.
28.
LoganH., PressF., & SumsionJ. (2012). The quality imperative: Tracing the rise of ‘quality’ in Australian early childhood education and care policy. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 37(3), 4–13.
29.
LoganH., SumsionJ., & PressF. (2013). The Child Care Act 1972: A critical juncture in Australian ECEC and the emergence of ‘quality’. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 38(4), 84–91.
30.
LoganH., SumsionJ., & PressF. (2014). Uncovering hidden dimensions of Australian early childhood policy history: Insights from interviews with policy ‘elites’. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 22(5), 711–722. doi: 10.1080/1350293X.2014.969086
31.
MurrayS. (1986). Quality of long day child care in Australia: Report to the Minister for Community Services.Watson, ACT: Australian Early Childhood Association.
32.
National Childcare Accreditation Council (NCAC). (2009). Making a difference for children. The Australian journey in assuring quality child care.Surry Hills, NSW: NCAC.
33.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2006). Starting strong II: Early childhood education and care.Paris: OECD.
34.
PennH. (2012). Childcare markets: Do they work? In PennH. & LloydE. (Eds.), Childcare markets: Can they deliver an equitable service? (pp. 19–42). Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.
35.
PiersonP. (2004). Politics in time: History, institutions, and social analysis.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
PiersonP. (2005). The study of policy development. Journal of Policy History, 17(1), 34–51.
37.
PressF., & WongS. (2013). A voice for young children: 75 years of Early Childhood Australia.Canberra: Early Childhood Australia.
38.
PuseyM. (2003). The experience of middle Australia. The dark side of economic reform.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39.
RobertsonS., & CoxE. (1981). Scarce for kids: Which NSW children can find the services they need?Sydney: Council of Social Service of New South Wales.
40.
RyanS., & BramstonT. (2003). The Hawke Government: A critical retrospective.North Melbourne: Pluto Press.
41.
ScheiweK., & WillekensH. (2009). Child care and preschool development in Europe: Institutional perspectives.Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
42.
SumsionJ. (2006). From Whitlam to economic rationalism and beyond: A conceptual framework for political activism in children's services. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 31(1), 1–9.
43.
SumsionJ., & GoodfellowJ. (2009). Parents as consumers of early childhood education and care: The feasibility of demand-led improvements to quality. In KingD. & MeagherG. (Eds.), Paid care in Australia: Politics, profits, practices (pp. 167–202). Sydney: Sydney University Press.
44.
SylvaK., MelhuishE., SammonsP., Siraj-BlatchfordI., TaggartB., & ElliotK. (2003). The effective provision of pre-school education (EPPE) project: Findings from the pre-school period. Research brief. London: Department for Education and Skills.
45.
WangmannJ. (1991). Accreditation of early childhood services in Australia: Report to the Department of Health, Housing and Community Services.Canberra: Department of Health, Housing & Community Services.
46.
WangmannJ. (1994). Accreditation in Australia. In MellorE.J. & CoombeK. (Eds.), Issues in early childhood services (pp. 139–52). Melbourne: WCB Publishers.
47.
WangmannJ. (1995). Towards integration and quality assurance in children's services.Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
48.
WattsB., & PattersonP. (1985). In search of quality. Home and day care centre: Complementary environments for the growing child.Brisbane: Lady Gowrie Child Centre.
