EARLY CHILDHOOD PROFESSIONALS ARE increasingly being asked to work with children and families using strengths approaches1. However, what does this mean for working with families to support children's mathematical development? Specifically, how can this approach support and engage families, including those who may disengage from their child's mathematics education? This article aims to introduce a strengths framework for supporting children's mathematics learning opportunities in family and community contexts. We apply a Strengths Approach (McCashen, 2005) to an example from an early childhood mathematics program called Let's Count. Let's Count was designed as a means of assisting families to help their young children (aged three to five years) play with, investigate and learn mathematical ideas (Perry & Gervasoni, 2012). Using examples of case studies from Let's Count, we use McCashen's (2005) five-column strengths framework to present ways in which early childhood professionals can support families to explore mathematics with their children, using the unique everyday resources and opportunities of each family.
BergmanM. M. (2010). Hermeneutic content analysis: Textual and audiovisual analyses within a mixed methods framework. In TashakkoriA. & TeddlieC. (Eds.), SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research (2nd ed., pp. 379–396). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
3.
Bernard van Leer Foundation. (2007). Successful transitions: The continuum from home to school. Early Childhood Matters, 107, 23–28.
4.
ChristensonS. L. (2004). The family–school partnership: An opportunity to promote the learning competence of all students. School Psychology Review, 33(1), 83–104. doi: 10.1521/scpq.18.4.454.26995
5.
Committee on Early Childhood Pedagogy. (2000). Eager to learn: Educating our preschoolers.Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
6.
Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). (2009). Belonging, Being & Becoming: The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia.Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
7.
Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). (2011). The future of the Inclusion and Professional Support Program for child care services: A discussion paper to inform the policy and selection processes of the Inclusion and Professional Support Program in the next funding agreement period, 2012–2015.Canberra: Office of Early Childhood Education and Childcare.
8.
DockettS., PerryB., KearneyE., HampshireA., MasonJ., & SchmiedV. (2011). Facilitating children's transition to school from families with complex support needs.Albury, NSW: Research Institute for Professional Practice, Learning and Education, Charles Sturt University.
9.
EpleyP., SummersJ. A., & TurnbullA. (2010). Characteristics and trends in family-centered conceptualizations. Journal of Family Social Work, 13(3), 269–285.
10.
EpsteinW. M. (2008). Book review: The true hypocrites. In WitkinS.L. & SaleebeyD. (Eds.), Research on Social Work Practice, 18(1), 82–84. doi: 10.1177/1049731507304361
11.
FentonA. (2013). A Strengths Approach to Child Protection Education (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved 28 January, 2016, from http://eprints.jcu.edu.au/24044/.
12.
FentonA., & McFarland-PiazzaL. (2014). Supporting early childhood pre-service teachers in their work with children, families, and communities with complex needs: A strengths approach. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 35(1), 22–38. doi: 10.1080/10901027.2013.874384
13.
GervasoniA., & PerryB. (2015). Children's mathematical knowledge prior to starting school and implications for transition. In PerryB., MacDonaldA. & GervasoniA. (Eds.), Mathematics and transition to school: International perspectives (pp. 47–64). Singapore: Springer.
14.
GlickenM. D. (2004). Using the strengths perspective in social work practice: A positive approach for the helping professions.Boston, MA: Pearson.
15.
JeynesW. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relation of parental involvement to urban elementary school student academic achievement. Urban Education, 40(3), 237–269. doi: 10.1177/0042085905274540
16.
JohanssonI., SewpaulV., HorverakS., SchjelderupL., OmreC., & BórnholdtL. (2008). Innovations in social welfare: Empowerment and globalisation in a Nordic social work education context. International Journal of Social Welfare, 17, 260–268. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2008.00572.x
MacDonaldA. (2015). Let's Count: Early childhood educators and families working in partnership to support young children's transitions in mathematics education. In PerryB., MacDonaldA. & GervasoniA. (Eds.), Mathematics and transition to school: International perspectives (pp. 85–102). Singapore: Springer.
19.
MagnusonK. A., & ShagerH. M. (2010). Early education: Progress and promise for children from low-income families. Children and Youth Services Review, 32(9), 1186–1198.
20.
McCashenW. (2005). The Strengths Approach.Bendigo, Vic.: St. Luke's Innovative Resources.
21.
McNealR. B. (2001). Differential effects of parental involvement on cognitive and behavioural outcomes by socioeconomic status. Journal of Socio-Economics, 30, 171–179. doi: 10.1016/S1053-5357(00)00100-1
22.
MelhuishE. C., PhanM. B., SylvaK., SammonsP., Siraj-BlatchfordI., & TaggartB. (2008). Effects of the home learning environment and preschool center experience upon literacy and numeracy development in early primary school. Journal of Social Issues, 64(1), 95–114. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00550.x
23.
MorrisonE. F., Rimm-KauffmanS., & PiantaR. C. (2003). A longitudinal study of mother–child interactions at school entry and social and academic outcomes in middle school. Journal of School Psychology, 41(3), 185–200. doi: 10.1016/S0022-4405(03)00044-X
PerryB., & GervasoniA. (2012). Let's Count educators' handbook.Sydney: The Smith Family.
26.
SaleebeyD. (Ed.). (2009). The strengths perspective in social work practice (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
27.
TaylorE. H. (2006). The weaknesses of the strengths model: Mental illness as a case in point. Best Practices in Mental Health, 2(1), 1–30.
28.
Young-LoveridgeJ., PetersS., & CarrM. (1998). Enhancing the mathematics of four-year-olds: An overview of the EMI-4s study. Journal of Australian Research in Early Childhood Education, 1, 82–93.
29.
YinR. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
