THE EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION and care reforms in Australia have been heralded as a cause for celebration, greatly anticipated by a sector that has lamented its invisibility. Drawing on qualitative data from a study of three towns in the south-west of Western Australia, this article aims to provoke reflection on where we stand with the celebrated aim of putting young children at the centre of the vision for Australia. The South-West Early Childhood Project investigated how childhood is constructed and how communities welcome families and young children. The study identified several themes: narratives of invisibility/visibility; narratives of sitting still/being active; and narratives of conformity/diversity. The article foregrounds the acclaimed experience of the city of Reggio Emilia (Italy) and extends an invitation to communities in Australia to position themselves on a trajectory of hope by harnessing collective wisdom in support of landmark early childhood reforms.
Australian Government Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). (2009). Belonging, Being & Becoming: The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia.Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.
4.
BrunerJ. S. (1996). The culture of education.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
BuckleyA., TyeM., GiamminutiS., MerewetherJ., KuzichS., & GalardiG. (2013). South West early childhood project: An exploratory study of three South West towns.Bentley, WA: Curtin University of Technology.
6.
CheesemanS. (2007). Pedagogical silences in Australian early childhood social policy. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 8(3), 244–254.
7.
CheesemanS., & TorrJ. (2009). From ideology to productivity: Reforming early childhood education and care in Australia. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 3(1), 61–74.
8.
Commonwealth of Australia. (2014). Australian Early Development Census. Retrieved 5 November, 2014, from www.aedc.gov.au/.
9.
DahlbergG., & MossP. (2005). Ethics and politics in early childhood education.Abingdon, UK: RoutledgeFalmer.
10.
DelrioG. (2011). An educating community (J. McCall, Trans.). In VecchiV., CavalliniI., FilippiniT. & TrancossiL. (Eds.), The wonder of learning: The hundred languages of children (pp. 8–9). Reggio Emilia, Italy: Reggio Children.
11.
DelrioG. (2012). Our responsibility toward young children and toward their community. In EdwardsC., GandiniL. & FormanG. (Eds.), The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia experience in transformation (pp. 81–88). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
12.
DenzinN. K. (2010). Moments, mixed methods, and paradigm dialogs. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 419–427.
EisnerE. W. (1991). The enlightened eye: Qualitative enquiry and the enhancement of educational practice.New York: Macmillan.
15.
FenechM., GiugniM., & BrownK. (2012). A critical analysis of the National Quality Framework: Mobilising for a vision for children beyond minimum standards. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 37(4), 5–14.
16.
FreireP. (1994). Pedagogy of hope.London: Bloomsbury.
17.
GiamminutiS. (2013). Dancing with Reggio Emilia: Metaphors for quality.Mt. Victoria, NSW: Pademelon Press.
18.
JamesA., & JamesA. L. (2008). Key concepts in childhood studies.London: Sage.
MalaguzziL. (1994). Your image of the child: Where teaching begins. Child Care Information Exchange, 96, 52–56.
21.
MalaguzziL. (1998). History, ideas, and basic philosophy: An interview with Lella Gandini. In EdwardsC., GandiniL. & FormanG. (Eds.), The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach—advanced reflections (pp. 49–97). Westport, CT: Ablex.
22.
MasseyC., AlpassF., FlettR., LewisK., MorrissS., & SligoF. (2006). Crossing fields: The case of a multi-disciplinary research team. Qualitative Research, 6(2), 131–147.
23.
QvortrupJ., CorsaroW. A., & HonigM.S. (Eds.). (2009). The Palgrave handbook of childhood studies.Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
RichardsP. (1995). Participatory rural appraisal: A quick-and-dirty critique. In IIED (Ed.), Critical reflections from practice, PLA Notes, No. 24 (pp. 13–16). London: IIED.
28.
RinaldiC. (1998). The space of childhood. In CeppiG. & ZiniM. (Eds.), Children, spaces, relations: Metaproject for an environment for young children (pp. 114–120). Reggio Emilia, Italy: Reggio Children.
29.
RinaldiC. (2001). Infant–toddler centers and pre-schools as places of culture. In GiudiciC., RinaldiC. & KrechevskyM. (Eds.), Making learning visible: Children as individual and group learners (pp. 38–46). Reggio Emilia, Italy: Reggio Children.
30.
RinaldiC. (2013). Re-imagining childhood: The inspiration of Reggio Emilia principles in South Australia.Adelaide, SA: Government of South Australia.
31.
SumsionJ. (2006). From Whitlam to economic rationalism and beyond: A conceptual framework for political activism in children's services. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 31(1), 1–9.
32.
SumsionJ., BarnesS., CheesemanS., HarrisonL., KennedyA., & StonehouseA. (2009). Insider perspectives on developing Belonging, Being & Becoming: The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 34(4), 4–13.
33.
TaylerC. (2011). Changing policy, changing culture: Steps toward early learning quality improvement in Australia. International Journal of Early Childhood, 43, 211–225.
34.
United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation (UNFAO). (2013). What is rapid rural appraisal? Retrieved 11 December, 2013, from www.fao.org/docrep/006/w2352e/W2352E03.htm.
