EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATORS ARE required to recognise multiple sources of evidence of children's mathematical thinking. This paper encourages early childhood educators to consider how young children's spontaneous dance improvisations provide evidence of their exploration of the mathematical concepts of spatial orientation and spatial visualisation. In this research, examples of four-year-old children's improvisational dance are drawn from a larger corpus of children's dance vignettes and analysed, highlighting children's demonstrations of embodied spatial orientation and spatial visualisation. Recognising children's spatial thinking provides opportunities for educators to develop contingent learning experiences that facilitate children's exploration of concepts of lines, angles, direction and two- and three-dimensional shapes through other forms of symbolic expression.
BasitT. (2003). Changing practice through policy: Trainee teachers and the National Numeracy Strategy. Research Papers in Education, 18(1), 61–74.
4.
ConroyH., & HarcourtD. (2009). Informed agreement to participate: Beginning the partnership with children in research. Early Child Development and Care, 179(2), 157–165.
5.
CookD. (1996). Mathematical sense making and role play in the nursery. Early Child Development & Care, 121, 55–66.
6.
DaviesM. (2003). Movement and dance in early childhood (2nd edn). California: Sage Publications Inc.
7.
DeansJ. (2014). Thinking, feeling and relating: Young children learning through dance. (Doctor of Philosophy), The University of Melbourne.
8.
Department of Education and Early Childhood Development (DEECD). (2009). Victorian Early Years Learning and Development Framework.Melbourne, Australia: Early Childhood Strategy Division DEECD.
9.
Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). (2009). Belonging, Being & Becoming: The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia.Canberra, Australia: DEEWR.
EhrlichS. B., LevineS. C., & Goldin-MeadowS. (2006). The importance of gesture in children's spatial reasoning. Developmental Psychology, 42(6), 1259–1268.
12.
EliaI., GagatsisA., & van den Heuvel-PanhuizenM. (2014). The role of gestures in making connections between space and shape aspects and their verbal representations in the early years: Findings from a case study. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(4), 735–761. doi:10.1007/s13394-013-0104-5
13.
EricksonF. (1982). Audiovisual records as a primary data source. In GrimshawA. (Ed.), Sociological Methods and Research, 11(2), 213–232.
14.
EricksonF. (2006). Definition and analysis of data from videotape: Some research procedures and their rationales. In GreenJ.L., CamilliG. & ElmoreP. B. (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 177–205). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15.
GardnerH. (2011). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligence.Philadelphia: Basic Books.
16.
GelmanR., & ButterworthB. (2005). Number and language: How are they related? TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 9(1), 6–10.
17.
GinsburgH. P., DuchH., ErtleB., & NobleK. G. (2012). How can parents help their children learn math? In WasikB.H. (Ed.), Handbook of family literacy (pp. 51–65). New York: Routledge.
18.
GouldP. (2012). What number knowledge do children have when starting kindergarten in NSW? Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 37(3), 105–110.
19.
Green GilbertA. G., (2003). Towards best practices in dance education through the theory of multiple intelligences. Journal of Dance Education, 3(1), 28–33.
20.
HallR. (2000). Videorecording as theory. In KellyA. & LeshR. (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 647–664). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21.
InnisR. E. (Ed.). (1985). Semiotics: An introductory anthology.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
22.
LabanR. (1963). Modern educational dance.London: MacDonald & Evans Ltd.
23.
LedermanS. J., & KlatzkyR. L. (1987). Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 342–368.
24.
NewcombeN. S., & FrickA. (2010). Early education for spatial intelligence: Why, what and how. Mind, Brain and Education, 4(3), 102–111.
25.
NewloveJ., & DalbyJ. (2004). Laban for all.London: Nick Hern Books Ltd.
26.
PriddleR. E. (1978). Learning spatial concepts through dance-type activities. Paper presented at the Congress on Research in Dance (CORD) Research Annual IX: Essays in dance research, Philadelphia.
27.
Pugh McCutchenB. (2006). Teaching dance as art in education.USA: Sheridan Books.
28.
RadfordL. (2009). Why do gestures matter? Sensuous cognition and the palpability of mathematical meanings. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(2), 111–126. doi: 10.1007/s10649-008-9127-3
29.
SansomA. N. (2011). Movement and dance in young children's lives. Crossing the divide.New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.
30.
SaramaJ. (2002). Listening to teachers: Planning for professional development. Teaching Children Mathematics, 9, 36–39.
31.
SaramaJ., & ClementsD. H. (2009). Early childhood mathematics education research: Learning trajectories for young children.New York, NY: Routledge.
32.
SchillerW., & MeinersJ. (2003). Dance—Moving beyond steps to ideas. In WrightS. (Ed.), Children, meaning-making and the arts (pp. 91–116). New South Wales: Pearson.
33.
Smith-AutardJ. (2002). The art of dance in education (2nd edn). London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
34.
VygotskyL. (1986). Thought and language (A. Kozulin, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (Original work published 1934).
