THIS PAPER SEEKS TO engage the field of early childhood education and care (ECEC) leadership in critical analysis. Drawing on theorisations from the ‘new image of the child’, the paper is structured to provide some analytic insight into the implications that current conceptualisations of children have for leadership practices in the field of ECEC. The discussion highlights the need for multi-layered understanding of leadership among ECEC professionals and the importance of leadership for quality ECEC. This paper also identifies and analyses two main issues present in the current Australian ECEC context that appeared to be hindering leadership enactment among ECEC educators. The ultimate intent of this paper is not to critique the existing state of ECEC practice; rather, the value of this work is its potential to intervene in the scholarship of the ECEC transformation and practice, to disrupt dominant practices and highlight the benefits of embracing the explicit and implicit layers of leadership in early childhood pedagogical practices.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgbenyegaJ. S., & KlibthongS. (2013). A whole schooling approach: Has inclusive education gone astray? International Journal of Whole Schooling, 9, 1–22.
2.
AlvessonM., & SveningssonS. (2003). The great disappearing act: difficulties in doing “leadership”. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(3), 359–381.
3.
Australian Children's Education and Care Quality Authority (ACECQA). (2011). Guide to the National Quality Framework.Sydney: ACECQA.
4.
BallS. J. (2003). The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18, 215–228. doi: 10.1080/0268093022000043065
5.
BlaseJ., & AndersonG. (1995). The micropolitics of educational leadership.London: Cassell.
6.
BrennanD. (2007). Home and away: the policy context in Australia. In HillE., PocockB. & ElliotA., Kids count: Better early childhood education and care in Australia (pp. 57–74). NSW: Sydney University Press.
7.
BuschG., & TheobaldM. (2013). Evidence-based practice. In PendergastD. & GarvisS. (Eds.) Teaching early years: Rethinking curriculum, pedagogy and assessment (pp. 317–333). Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
8.
Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). (2009). Belonging, being and becoming: The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia.Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
9.
Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). (2011). Final report: Baseline evaluation of the Early Years Learning Framework (EYLF). Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
10.
Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). (2012). Qualitative report: Baseline evaluation of the Early Years Learning Framework (EYLF). Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
11.
Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). (n.d.). Quantitative report: Baseline evaluation of the Early Years Learning Framework (EYLF). Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
12.
DuhnI. (2006). The making of global citizens: traces of cosmopolitanism in the New Zealand early childhood curriculum, Te Whariki. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 7, 191–202.
13.
DuhnI. (2008). Globalising childhood: Assembling the bicultural child in the New Zealand early childhood curriculum, Te Whāriki. International Critical Childhood Policy Studies, 1, 82–105.
14.
EbbeckM., & WaniganayakeM. (2003). Early childhood professionals: Leading today and tomorrow.Sydney: MacLennan and Petty.
15.
ErautM. (2000). Non formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 113–136.
16.
FenechM., GiugniM., & BownK. (2012). A critical analysis of the ‘national quality framework’: Mobilising for a vision for children beyond minimum standards. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 37(4), 5–15.
17.
FleerM., HeregaardM., & TudgeJ. (Eds.). (2009). Constructing childhood. In World Yearbook of Education 2009: Childhood Studies and the Impact of Globalization: Policies and Practices at Global and Local Levels (pp. 1–20). New York: Routledge.
18.
GrarockM., & MorrisseyA. M. (2013). Teachers' perceptions of their abilities to be educational leaders in Victorian childcare settings. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 38(2), 4–13.
19.
HardL. (2006). Horizontal violence in early childhood education and care: Implications for leadership enactment. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 31(3), 40–48.
20.
HardL. (2008). Understanding leadership enactment in early childhood education and care.Saarbrucken: VDM.
21.
HardL., & JónsdóttirA. H. (2013). Leadership is not a dirty word: Exploring and embracing leadership in ECEC. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 21(3), 311–325. doi: 10.1080/1350293X.2013.814355
22.
HarrisA. (2005). Crossing boundaries and breaking barriers: Distributing leadership in schools.London: iNet, Specialist Schools Trust.
23.
HeikkaJ., & WaniganayakeM. (2011). Pedagogical leadership from a distributed perspective within the context of early childhood education. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 14, 499–512.
24.
KarpN. (2005). Building a new early childhood professional development system based on the 3 Rs: Research, Rigor, and Respect. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 26, 171–178.
25.
KjørholtA., & TrineA. (2005). Child research towards 2015: A global scenario. Proceedings of the Childwatch International Key Institutions Assembly, Hurdal, Norway, 25–28.
26.
LalondeM. (2013). Everything I need to know about leadership I learned as an EC educator. ChildCareExchange, 35(2), 8–10.
27.
MilleiZ., & SumsionJ. (2011). The ‘work’ of community in Belonging, Being and Becoming: The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 12, 71–85.
28.
NolanA., & KilderryA. (2010). Postdevelopmentalism and professional learning: implications for understanding the relationship between play and pedagogy. In BrookerE. & EdwardsS. (Eds.), Engaging play (pp. 108–121). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
29.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2006). Starting strong II: Early childhood education and care.Paris: OECD.
30.
OsgoodJ. (2006). Professionalism and performativity: the feminist challenge facing early years practitioners. Early Years: An International Research Journal, 26, 187–199.
31.
RoddJ. (2013). Leadership in early childhood: The pathway to professionalism.NSW: Allen & Unwin.
32.
RyanJ. (2006). Inclusive leadership and social justice for schools. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 5(1), 3–17.
33.
SharmaU., & DesaiI. (2008). The changing roles and responsibilities of school principals relative to inclusive education. In ForlinC. & LianM.G.J. (Eds.), Reform, inclusion, & teacher education: Towards a new era of special education in the Asia-Pacific Region (pp. 153–168). UK: Routledge.
34.
United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF). (2008). The childcare transition: A league table of early childhood education and care in economically advanced countries.Florence: UNICEF.
35.
VandenbroeckM. (2006). Autonomous children, privileging negotiation, and new limits to freedom. International Journal of Educational Policy, Research, and Practice: Reconceptualizing Childhood Studies, 7, 71–80.
36.
WhalleyM. E., & AllenS. (2011). Leading practice in early years settings.Exeter: SAGE.
37.
WoodrowC., & BuschG. (2008). Repositioning early childhood leadership as action and activism. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 16, 83–93.
