Early Childhood Teachers' Views towards using Constructivist Internet-Based Environments to Support Children's Learning Activities: A Mixed-Methods Study
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2015
Early Childhood Teachers' Views towards using Constructivist Internet-Based Environments to Support Children's Learning Activities: A Mixed-Methods Study
AS ONLINE TECHNOLOGY HAS become increasingly pervasive in children's lives, this study explores: (1) early childhood teachers' views and preferences for use among the various functions of a Constructivist Internet-Based Environment (CIBE) in early childhood settings; and (2) whether early childhood teachers' technology-related knowledge (ECTTK) can predict their preferences. By employing a mixed-methods study with 168 pre-K teachers in Singapore, our findings indicate that: (1) the five functions of CIBE cater to the different curriculum activities, including thematic-based learning, instruction of content knowledge, group project work, children's free play and science learning; and (2) teachers' general technological knowledge, technological content knowledge, and technological pedagogical knowledge are able to predict their preferences for using a CIBE. We discuss these findings and make suggestions regarding ways to optimise the adoption of a CIBE to cater to a broad spectrum of early school learning activities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AngeliC., & ValanidesN. (2006). A socio-technical analysis of factors affecting the integration of ICT in primary and secondary education. In TanW. H. and SubramaniamR. (Eds.), Handbook of research on literacy in technology at the K–12 level (pp. 604–625). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
2.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
ChaiC. S. (2010). The relationships among Singaporean teachers' ICT competencies, pedagogical beliefs and their beliefs on the espoused use of ICT. Asia Pacific Education Researcher, 19(3), 387–400.
4.
ChuangH.-H., & TsaiC. C. (2002). Developing web-based curricula: Issues and challenges. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(6), 623–636.
5.
DodgeA. M., HusainN., & DukeN. K. (2011). Connected kids? K-2 children's use and understanding of the internet. Language Arts, 89(2), 86–98.
6.
DownlingK. (2001). Information, technology, education and health care: Constructivism in the 21st century. Educational Studies, 27(3), 229–235.
7.
FishA. M., LiX., McCarrickK., ButlerS. T., StantonB., & BrumittG. A. (2008). Early childhood computer experiences and cognitive development among urban low-income preschoolers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(1), 97–113.
8.
FuchsT., & WossmannL. (2005). Computers and student learning: Bivariate and multivariate evidence on the availability and use of computers at home and school. Brussels Economic Review, 47, 359–385.
9.
GillaniB. B. (1997). Web-based instruction and the traditional classroom: Similarities and differences. In KhanB.H. (Ed.), Web-based instruction (pp. 41–46). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
10.
HansonW., CreswellJ., ClarkV. L. P., PetskaK., & CreswellJ. D. (2004). Mixed methods research designs in counselling psychology. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 52, 224–235.
11.
HatchJ. A. (2007). Doing qualitative research in education settings.Albany: State University of New York Press.
12.
JacksonL. A., Von EyeA., BioccaF. A., BarbatsisG., ZhaoY., & FitzgeraldH. E. (2006). Does home Internet use influence the academic performance of low income children? Development Psychology, 42(3), 429–435.
13.
JohnsonG. M. (2006). Internet use and cognitive development: A theoretical framework. E-Learning, 3(4), 565–573.
14.
JohnsonG. M. (2010). Internet use and child development: Validation of the ecological techno subsystem. Educational Technology & Society, 13(1), 176–185.
15.
JohnsonG. M., & PuplampuP. (2008). A conceptual framework for understanding the effect of the Internet on child development: The ecological techno-subsystem. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 34(1), 19–28.
16.
KoehlerM. J., & MishraP. (2010). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education (CITE), 9(1), 60–70.
17.
LeeM. H., & TsaiC. C. (2005). Exploring high school students' and teachers' preferences toward the contructivist Internet-based learning environment in Taiwan. Educational Studies, 31(2), 149–167.
18.
LiX., & AtkinsM. S. (2004). Early childhood computer experience and cognitive and motor development. Paediatrics, 113(6), 1715–1722.
19.
LiangJ.-C., & TsiaC. C. (2008). Internet self-efficacy and preferences toward constructivist Internet-based learning environments: A study of pre-school teachers in Taiwan. Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 226–237.
20.
LooA. (2013). Internet surfing for kindergarten children: A feasible study. Gifted Education International, 28(2), 176–184.
21.
National Centre for Educational Statistics. (2003). Computer and Internet use by children and adolescents in 2011.Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved 22 January, 2013, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2004/2004014.pdf.
NickersonR. S. (2005). Technology and cognitive amplification. In SternbergR. J. and PreissD. D. (Eds.), Intelligence and technology: The impact of tools on the nature and development of human abilities (pp. 3–28). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
SandvigC. (2003). Public internet access for young children in the inner city: Evidence to inform access subsides and content regulation. Information Society, 19(2), 171–183.
26.
SmeetsE., GennipH. V., & RensC. V. (2009). Teaching styles of teacher educators and their use of ICT. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 10(3), 49–62.
27.
TashakkoriA., & TeddlieC. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
VygotskyL. (1986). Thought and language.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30.
WenL. M. C., TsaiC. C., LinH. M., & ChuangS. C. (2004). Cognitive-metacognitive and content-technical aspects of constructivist Internet-based learning environments: A LISREL analysis. Computers & Education, 43(3), 237–248.
YellandN., & KilderryA. (2010). Becoming numerate with information and communications technologies in the twenty-first century. International Journal of Early Years Education, 18(2), 91–106.
