THIS ARTICLE IS INTENDED to provide a timely outline of early childhood education (ECE) provision and policy in China. It gives a commentary on ECE policy in China and argues for new policy directions. Since 2010, the Chinese government has launched a comprehensive set of education policies designed to promote equitable access to ECE and improvements in the quality. These policies arose as a political response to a national complaint about the difficulties to enrolling children in qualified kindergartens and the growing gaps between education in the cities and rural areas. This study analyses the difficulties for the Chinese government and scholars to reach a balance between the equity and quality of ECE in different areas, especially in rural areas and for migrant children. It concludes that local government will, as well as central government, play an important role in determining whether formulated policies are translated into action on the ground. It is critical to increase the public funding of ECE in China and to conceive specific allocations of the budget.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Australian Government Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. (DEEWR). (2012). National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education & Care.Canberra: Government of Australia.
2.
BarnettW. S. (2007). Benefits and costs of quality early childhood education. Legal Rights Journal, 179(1), 7–23.
3.
BeveridgeW. (1942). Social Insurance and Allied Services (Beveridge Report). Presented to Parliament by Command of His Majesty, UK.
4.
BradburyA. (2011). Rethinking assessment and inequality: The production of disparities in attainment in early years education. Journal of Education Policy, 26(5), 655–676.
5.
CaiY. (2008). Social harmony and macroregulation of the funding system of early childhood education. Chinese Education and Society, 41(2), 20–32.
6.
Chinese State Council. (2010a). National Medium to Long Term Planning Outline for Educational Reform and Development (2010–2020). Beijing: Government of China.
7.
Chinese State Council. (2010b). Documents of Early Education Development (National Document No. 41). Beijing: Government of China.
8.
Chinese State Council. (2011). Documents about Increasing Education Finance (National Document 2011.22). Beijing: Government of China.
9.
Council of Australian Governments. (COAG). (2009). National Quality Standard for Early Childhood Education and School Age Care.Canberra: Government of Australia.
10.
CunhaF. & HeckmanJ. J. (2006). Investing in our young people. Unpublished manuscript, University of Chicago, Department of Economics.
11.
EngleP. L., FernaldL., AldermanH., , & the Global Child Development Steering Group. (2011). Strategies for reducing inequalities and improving developmental outcomes for young children in low-income and middle-income countries. The Lancet, 378, 1339–1353.
12.
HeckmanJ. J. (2011). The Economics of Inequality: The Value of Early Childhood Education. American Educator, 35(1), 31–35, 47.
13.
HeckmanJ. J., MoonS. H., PintoR., SavelyevP., & YavitzA. (2010). A new cost-benefit and rate of return analysis for the Perry preschool program: A summary. (NBER Working Paper, No. 16180). National Bureau of Economic Research.
14.
IshimineK., TaylerC., & ThorpeK. (2009). Accounting for quality in Australian childcare: A dilemma for policy makers. Journal of Education Policy, 24(6), 717–732.
15.
LiuY. (2009). Experiment of putting the 5-year-old education to the compulsory education 2009-2012. Project of National Educational Science Planning Office, China.
16.
MillerL. J., & SmithS. C. (2011). Did the No Child Left behind Act miss the mark? Assessing the potential benefits from an accountability system for early childhood education. Educational Policy, 25(1), 193–214.
Ministry of Finance, and Ministry of Education. (2011). Document about Increasing Early Childhood Education Finance (Ministry of Finance and Education Document 2011. p. 405). Beijing: Government of China.
National Committee Members' Survey. (2009). Cottage nurseries are more than the registered ones! Retrieved 12 July, 2012, from http://news.wuhan.net.cn.
21.
NoresM., & BarnettS. (2010). Benefits of early childhood interventions across the world: (Under) Investing in the very young. Economics of Education Review, 29, 271–282.
PeterkinR., Jewell-ShermanD., KelleyL., & BoozerL. (2011). Every Child, every classroom, every day: School leaders who are making equity a reality. Jossey-Bass, an Imprint of Wiley.
QianY. (2013). The Study on Early Childhood Education Policy.Nanjing: Nanjing Normal University Press.
26.
RileyR. W., & ColemanA. L. (2011). Turning the page on the equity debate in education: How to give all children a real opportunity. American Educator, 35(1), 26–30, 46.
27.
SherradenM., & ZouL. (2009). Asset-based policy in Hong Kong: Child development fund. (CSD Policy Brief 09-06). St. Louis: Washington University, Center for Social Development.
28.
YoshikawaH. (1994). Prevention as Cumulative Protection: Effects of Early Family Support and Education on Chronic Delinquency and Its Risks. Psychological Bulletin.115(1), 28-32.
29.
YuY. P. (2013). Society and the Quality of Early Childhood Education. People's Education, 1(3-4), 11–12.
30.
WangmannJ. (1995). Towards integration and quality assurance in children's services.Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
