THIS ARTICLE PRESENTS FINDINGS from a case study investigation of a longstanding campaign in one Australian state to change the minimum regulated staff–child ratios for babies from one staff member for every five babies (1:5) to one staff member for every four (1:4). Using interviews with early childhood professionals and politicians, and document analysis of key policy texts, an ‘eventalization’ (Foucault, 1991) is generated to argue multiple ‘contingent events’ (Mills, 2003, p. 115) at the state, national and international level, enabled ratio campaign activists to intensively promote the 1:4 ratio. Simultaneously New South Wales politicians strategically aligned themselves with national early childhood education and care policy by approving 1:4. The article concludes with a discussion of the findings and implications for ECEC activists agitating for policy change in the future.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Booz & Company. (2008). Final report: Economic effects of a 1:4 staff-child ratio for under two year olds in child care.Sydney: NSW Department of Community Services.
2.
BownK., SumsionJ., & PressF. (2009). Influences on politicians' decision making for early childhood education and care policy: What do we know? What don't we know?Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 10(3), 194–217.
3.
BownK., SumsionJ., & PressF. (2011). Dark matter: the ‘gravitational pull’ of maternalist discourses on politicians' decision making for early childhood policy in Australia. Gender and Education, 23(3), 263–280.
4.
BradleyS. (2011). Inside the black box. An exploration of the impact of action and activity in the inner spheres of policy making on early childhood education and care policy. PhD thesis, Dublin Institute of Technology, Dublin.
5.
BrennanD. (1998). The politics of Australian child care. Philanthropy to feminism and beyond (Revised edn). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BroughM. (2007, 28 April). Keynote address to conference. Paper presented at the Childcare NSW Conference, Sydney, Australia.
Commonwealth of Australia. (2012, 25 August). Council of Australian Governments. Retrieved 30 August, 2012, from www.coag.gov.au/.
9.
Cross-sectoral Taskforce. (2006). Report on the implementation of a 1:4 staff–child ratio for children aged under two years in NSW children's services. Sydney.
10.
FaircloughN. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language.London: Longman.
11.
FitzJ., & HalpinD. (1994). Ministers and mandarins: Educational research in elite settings. In WalfordG. (Ed), Researching the powerful in education (pp. 32–50). London: UCL Press.
12.
FlottmanR., & PageJ. (2012). Getting early childhood onto the reform agenda: An Australian case study. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 6(1), 17–33.
13.
FoucaultM. (1991). Questions of method. In BurchellG., GordonC. & MillerP. (Eds), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 73–86). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14.
FoucaultM. (1994). Power. In FaubionJ. D. (Ed), Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984 volume 3.London: Penguin Books.
GiugniM. (2010). Retheorising equity in everyday routines in early childhood: A poststructuralist action research story. PhD dissertation, University of Melbourne, Melbourne.
17.
HellerK. J. (1996). Power, subjectification and resistance in Foucault. SubStance, 25(1), 78–110.
18.
MillsS. (2003). Michel Foucault.London: Routledge.
19.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2006). Starting strong II: Early childhood education and care.Paris: OECD.
20.
PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2002). Children's services regulation 2002. Regulatory impact statement, final report.Sydney: NSW Department of Community Services.
StakeR. (2006). Multiple case study analysis.New York: The Guilford Press.
25.
SumsionJ. (2006). From Whitlam to economic rationalism and beyond: A conceptual framework for political activism in children's services. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 33(1), 1–9.
26.
SumsionJ. (2007). Sustaining the employment of early childhood teachers in long day care: A case for robust hope, critical imagination and critical action. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 35(3), 311–327.
27.
TobinJ. (2008, 3–6 June). Things to look for when analyzing a transcript. Paper presented at the Reconceptualizing Early Childhood Education Conference, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia.
28.
UNICEF. (2008). The child care transition: A league table of early childhood education and care in economically advanced countries. Innocenti report card 8. Retrieved 10 March, 2010, from www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/rc8_eng.pdf.
