THE AUSTRALIAN STATE-BASED educational system of a national school curriculum that includes a pre-Year 1 Foundation Year has raised questions about the purpose of this year of early education. A document analysis was undertaken across three Australian states, examining three constructions of the pre-Year 1 class and tensions arising from varied perspectives. Tensions have emerged over state-based adaptations of the national curriculum, scripted pedagogies for change management, differing ideological perspectives and positioning of stakeholders. The results indicate that since 2012 there has been a shift in constructions of the pre-Year 1 class towards school-based ideologies, especially in Queensland. Accordingly, positioning of children, parents and teachers has also changed. These results resonate with previous international indications of ‘schooling’ early education. The experiences of Australian early adopters of the curriculum offer insights for other jurisdictions in Australia and internationally, and raise questions about future development in early years education.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArthurL. (2010). The (draft) English national curriculum: An early childhood perspective. Curriculum Perspectives, 30(3), 56–58.
2.
AubreyC. (2004). Implementing the Foundation Stage in reception classes. British Educational Research Journal, 30(5), 633–656.
3.
ACARA (Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority). (2011). The shape of the Australian Curriculum version 3.0. Accessed 4 April, 2012, at www.acara.edu.au/curriculum.html#3.
4.
BertramT.,&PascalC. (2002). Early years education: An international perspective.London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
DockettS.,&PerryB. (2007). Transitions to school: Perceptions, expectations, experiences.Sydney: UNSW Press.
18.
DockettS., PerryB., CampbellH, HardL., KearneyE., TaffeR.,&GreenhillJ. (2007). Early years learning and curriculum: Reconceptualising reception. Continuity of learning. Department of Education and Children's Services South Australia. Accessed 10 March, 2012, at www.decs.sa.gov.au/.
GrieshaberS. (2008). Interrupting stereotypes: Teaching and the education of young children. Early Education and Development, 19(3), 505–518.
21.
HardL.,&O'GormanL. (2007). Push-me or pull-you? An opportunity for early childhood leadership in the implementation of the Queensland early years curriculum. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 8(1), 50–60.
22.
HeckmanJ. (2011). Effective child development strategies. In ZiglerE., GillamW.&BarnettW. S. (Eds), The pre-K debates: Current controversies and issues (pp. 2–8). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
23.
Hirsch-PasekK.,&GolinkoffR. (2011). The great balancing act: Optimising core curricula through playful pedagogy. In ZiglerE., GillamW.&BarnettW. S. (Eds), The pre-K debates: Current controversies and issues (pp. 110–116). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
24.
JacobsG.,&CrowleyK. (2010). Reaching standards and beyond in kindergarten: Nurturing children's sense of wonder and joy in learning.Thousand Oaks: NAEYC/Corwin.
25.
KilgallonP., MaloneyC., &LockG. (2008). Early childhood teachers coping with educational change. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 33(1), 23–29.
26.
LukeA. (2010). Will the Australian national curriculum up the intellectual ante in classrooms?Curriculum Perspectives, 30(3), 59–64.
27.
McLachlanC., FleerM., &EdwardsS. (2011). Early childhood curriculum: Planning, assessment and implementation.Port Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
NuttallJ.,&EdwardsS. (2007). Theory, policy and practice: Three contexts for the development of Australia's early childhood curriculum documents. In Keesing-StylesL.&HedgesH. (Eds), Theorising Early Childhood Practice: emerging dialogues (pp. 3–22). Castle Hill: Pademelon.
30.
O'GormanL. (2008). The preparatory year in a Queensland nongovernment school: Exploring parents' views. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 33(3), 51–58.
31.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2006). Starting strong 11. Early childhood education and care.Paris: OECD.
32.
PetriwskyjA. (2010). Diversity and inclusion in the early years. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14(2), 195–212.
33.
PetriwskyjA. (2005). Transition to school: Early years teachers' roles. Australian Research in Early Childhood, 12(2), 35–50.
34.
PriorL. (2003). Using document analysis in social research.London: Sage.
QSA (Queensland Studies Authority). (2012b). Planning for implementing. Accessed 18 March, 2012, at www.qsa,qld.edu.au/13641.html.
37.
QSA (Queensland Studies Authority). (2006). Early Years Curriculum Guidelines.Brisbane:Author.
38.
RapleyT. (2008). Doing conversation, discourse and document analysis.London: Sage.
39.
SammonsP., SylvaK., MelhuishE., Siraj-BlatchfordI., TaggartB., ElliotK.,&MarshA. (2004). The effective provision of preschool education (EPPE) project technical paper 11: Report on the continuing effects of preschool education at age 7.London: Institute of Education, University of London.
40.
StamopoulosE. (2003). Elucidating the dilemma of P1 in Western Australian schools: Towards a solution. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 4(2), 188–197.
41.
State of Queensland (2002). Education and training reforms for the future: White paper.Brisbane: Author.
42.
SumsionJ., BarnesJ., CheesemanS., HarrisonL., KennedyA.,&StonehouseA. (2009). Insider perspectives on developing Belonging, Being and Becoming, the Early Years Learning Framework for Australia. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 34(4), 4–13.
43.
StephensonM.,&ParsonsM. (2007). Expectations: Effects of curriculum change as viewed by children, parents and practitioners. In DunlopA.-W.&FabianH. (Eds), Informing transitions in the early years: Research, policy and practice (pp. 137–148). Buckingham: Open University Press.
44.
TaylerC. (2006). Challenging partnerships in Australian early childhood education. Early Years, 26(3), 249–265.
45.
ThorpeK., TaylerC., BridgstockR., GrieshaberS., SkoienP., DanbyS.,&PetriwskyjA. (2005). Preparing for school: Report of the Queensland preparing for school trials.Brisbane: Queensland Department of Education and Training.
46.
TurunenT.,&MaattaK (2012). What constitutes the preschool curricula? Discourses of core curricula in preschool education in Finland in 1972–2000. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 20(2), 205–215. doi:10.1080/135029 3X.2012.681135
47.
TymmsI. (2010). Is curriculum a map or a set of survival skills? Navigation and survival in the politics of pedagogy. Curriculum Perspectives, 30(3), 20–27.
Victorian DEECD (Department of Education and Early Childhood Development). (2011). Victorian Early Years Learning and Development Framework. Accessed 27 March, 2012, at www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/earlyyears/index.html.
50.
Victorian DEECD (Department of Education and Early Childhood Development). (2010). Transition: A positive start to school resource kit.Melbourne: Author.
51.
Victorian DEECD (Department of Education and Early Childhood Development). (2008). Blueprint for early childhood development and school reform: Early childhood development discussion paper. Accessed 22 March, 2012, at http://acecqa.gov.au/storage/bp_ecdevelopment.pdf.
52.
WestburyI. (2000). Teaching as a reflective practice: What might didaktik teach curriculum. In WestburyI., HopmannS.&RiquartsK. (Eds), Teaching as a Reflective Practice: The German didaktik tradition (pp. 15–39). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
53.
WoodE. (2004). A new paradigm war? The impact of national curriculum policies on early childhood teachers' thinking and classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 20(4), 361–74.
54.
YoshikawaH., Mc CartheyR., MyersK., BubJ., Lygo-KilR.,&KnaluF. (2007). Early childhood education in Mexico: Expansion, quality improvement and curricular reform.Innocenti Working Paper. Florence: UNICEF.
