DESPITE EMERGING EVIDENCE OF THE contributors to high-quality family day care, a comprehensive comparison of international family day care systems has not been undertaken. The aim of this paper is to compare regulated family day care (FDC) in Australia, Canada, England and Wales, Germany, Ireland, Japan, Norway, New Zealand, Sweden, and the USA, using standard information about FDC usage and each country's structural characteristics, regulatory approach, quality assurance indicators, supervision and support, and sector challenges. A template was developed by representatives of the International Family Day Care Organisation, including academics, FDC providers, and FDC educators and management staff. The paper demonstrates that, although the existing body of published research is sufficient to provide clear guidance for developing and maintaining quality FDC, this knowledge is not always being applied in current practices. Three practices, each pertaining to several countries, are of concern: (a) minimal requirements for being a regulated FDC provider, (b) minimal quality assurance guidelines, and (c) minimal provider supports. There is great potential to learn from countries that have a high level of success in providing high-quality FDC and strong support for providers and families.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BigrasN., BouchardC., CantinG., BrunsonL., CoutuS., LemayL., TremblayM., JapelC. & CharronA. (2010). A comprehensive study of structural and process quality in center-based and family-based child care services. Child and Youth Forum, 39(3), 129–150.
2.
BollinG. G. (1993). An investigation of job stability and job satisfaction among family day care providers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 8(2), 207–220.
3.
BritnerP. A. & PhillipsD. A. (1995). Predictors of parent and provider satisfaction with child day care dimensions: A comparison of center-based and family day care. Child Welfare, 74, 1135–1168.
4.
BromerJ., Van HaitsmaM., DaleyK. & ModigilianiK. (2008). Staffed support networks and quality in family child care: Findings from the family child care network impact study. Chicago, Ill: Herr Research Center for Children and Social Policy, Erikson Institute. Retrieved on 31/10/12 from: www.erikson.edu/downloads/cmsFile.ashx?VersionID=3756&PropertyID=78.
5.
BurchinalM., HowesC. & KontosS. (2002). Structural predictors of child care quality in child care homes. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17, 87–105.
6.
Clarke-StewartK.A., GruberC.P. and FitzgeraldL.M. (1994). Children at home and in day care.Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.
7.
Clarke-StewartK.A., VandellD.L., BurchinalM., O'BrienM. & McCartneyK. (2002). Do regulable features of childcare homes affect children's development?Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17, 52–86.
8.
DohertyG., LeroD. D., GoelmanH., TougasJ. & LaGrangeA. (2000). Caring and learning environments: Quality in regulated family child care across Canada. Guelph, Canada: Centre for Families, Work and Well-Being, University of Guelph, Ontario. Retrieved on 31/10/12 from: www.worklifecanada.ca/page.php?id=58&r=5.
9.
DohertyG., LeroD. D., TougasJ., LaGrangeA. & GoelmanH. (2001). Policies and practices in Canadian family child care agencies. Guelph, Canada: Centre for Families, Work and Well-Being. Retrieved 31/10/12 from: www.uoguelph.ca/cfww/resources/index.htm.
10.
DohertyG. (2003). Stakeholder views on quality in family child care. Research Connections Canada, 9, 5–76.
11.
DohertyG., ForerB., LeroD.S., GoelmanH. & LaGrangeA. (2006). Predictors of quality in family child care. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21, 296–312.
12.
ElickerJ., Fortner-WoodC. & NoppJ. C. (1999). The context of infant attachment in family child care. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 20(2), 319–336.
13.
FischerJ. L. & EheartB. K. (1991). Family day care: A theoretical basis for improving quality. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 6, 549–563.
14.
FosterL. & BroadD. (1998). Flexible child care for flexible workers.Regina, Canada: Social Policy Research Unit, University of Regina.
15.
GoelmanH. & PenceA. R. (1987). Effects of child care, family, and individual characteristics on children's language development: The Victoria day care research project. In PhillipsD.A. (Ed), Quality in child care: What does the research tell us? (pp. 89–104), Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
16.
Goss Gilroy Inc. (1998). Providing home care for a living: A survey of providers working in the regulated sector.Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Child Care Federation.
17.
HarmsT. & CliffordR. M. (1989). Family day care rating scale.New York: Teachers College Press.
18.
JapelC., TremblayR. E. & CôtéS. (2005). Quality counts: Assessing the quality of daycare services based on the Quebec Longitudinal Study of Child Development. Montreal, Canada: Institute for Research on Public Policy. Retrieved on 31/10/12 from: www.irpp.org/choices/archive/vol11no5.pdf.
19.
KontosS. & RiessenJ. (1993). Predictors of job satisfaction, job stress, and job commitment in family day care. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 15, 427–441.
20.
KontosS., HowesC., ShinnM. & GalinskyE. (1995). Quality in family child care and relative care.New York: Teachers College Press.
21.
KontosS., HowesC. & GalinskyE. (1996). Does training make a difference to quality in family child care?Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 11, 427–445.
22.
LarnerM. (1996). Parents perspectives on quality in early care and education. In KaganS.L. and KohenN.E. (Eds), Reinventing early care and education: A vision for a quality system (pp. 21–42). San Francisco: Jossey-Boss Publishers.
23.
ModiglianiK. (1994). Promoting high quality family child care.New Haven, CT: Quality 2000 Initiative, Yale University.
24.
NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (1996). Characteristics and quality of child care for toddlers and preschoolers. Applied Developmental Sciences Quarterly, 11, 269–306.
25.
NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2005). Early child care and children's development in the primary grades: Follow-up results from the NICHD Study of Early Child Care. American Educational Research Journal, 43, 537–570.
26.
Peisner-FeinbergE. S., BurchinalM.R., CliffordR. M., CulkinM. L., HowesC., KaganS. L. & YazejianN. (2001). The relation of preschool child care quality to children's cognitive and social development trajectories through second grade. Child Development, 72, 1534–1553.
27.
PenceA. R. & GoelmanH. (1991). The relationship of regulation, training, and motivation to quality of care in family day care. Child and Youth Care Forum, 20, 83–101.
28.
RaikesH., RaikesH. & WilcoxB. (2005). Regulation, subsidy receipt and provider characteristics: What predicts quality in child care homes?Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 20, 164–184.
ToddC. M. & Deery-SmithD.M. (1996). Factors affecting turnover among family child care providers: A longitudinal study. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 11 (3), 351–376.
31.
WeaverR. H. (2002). Predictors of quality and commitment in family child care: Provider education, personal resources, and support. Early Education and Development, 13(3), 265–282.
32.
WhitebookM., HowesC. & PhillipsD. (1989). Who cares? Child care teachers and the quality of care in America. Final Report: National Child Care Staffing Study. Oakland, CA: Child Care Employee Project.
33.
WylieC., HodgenE., FerralH. & ThompsonJ. (2006). Contributions of early childhood education to age-14 performance: Evidence from the Competent Children, Competent Learners project.Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Education, New Zealand. Retrieved on 31/10.12 from: www.educationcounts.govt.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/7716/cc-contributions-ece14.pdf.
