THE PURPOSE OF THIS case study is to examine the ways in which the systematic teaching of poetry reading at Greek primary school enhances children's interest in reading and helps develop their oral skills by enriching their vocabulary and creative thinking. The present poetry project was implemented at a Greek public kindergarten in Rethymno, Crete in the school year 2010–2011. The sample consisted of 22 children (12 boys and 10 girls) aged five to six years. The teaching instruction design was based on Rosenblatt's Transactional theory. The data were collected through (1) an observation checklist, (2) an observation diary, (3) post-course interviews with the children, and (4) a post-course interview with the teacher of the class. The findings indicated that: (a) small children described the poetry program as the most enjoyable part of language arts, (b) children's reading engagement and motivation were increased and (c) through the poetry program children developed better literary and reading skills.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BerthoffA. (1981). The making of meaning.Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
2.
BotsoglouK. (2001). I katanomi tou xronou kai i organosi tou xorou stis organomenes drastiriotites sto nipiagogio. [Time and space distribution in organized activities at kindergarten]. Virtual School, The sciences of Education online. Retrieved 17 September 2009, from http://www.virtualschool.web.auth.gr/.
3.
CaiM. (2008). Transactional theory and the study of multicultural literature. Language Arts, 85(3), 212–220.
4.
CamangianP. (2008). Untemperred tongues: Teaching performance poetry for social justice. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 7(2), 35–55.
5.
CohenL.ManionL., & MorrisonK. (2000). Research Methods in Education.London: Routledge Falmer.
6.
CollinsP. (2008). Using poetry throughout the curriculum. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 44(2), 81–84.
7.
CowanK., & AlbersP. (2006). Semiotic representations: Building complex literacy practicies through the arts. Reading teacher, 60(2), 124–137.
8.
CummingR. (2007). Language play in the classroom: Encouraging children's intuitive creativity with words through poetry. Literacy, 41 (2), 93–101.
9.
DeMilleT. (2004). Seven reasons to teach poetry. The NERA Journal, 40(1), 16–17.
10.
DesaiS., & MarshT. (2005). Weaving multiple dialects in the classroom discourse: Poetry and spoken word as a critical teaching tool. The Journal of Culture and Education, 9(2), 71–90.
11.
ElsterC. (2010). “Snow on my eyelashes”: Language awareness through age-appropriate poetry experiences. Young Children, 65(5), 52–55.
12.
EnrightK., Torres-TorrettiD., & CarreonO. (2012). Hope is the thing with metaphors: De-situating literacies and learning in English Language Arts Classrooms. Language and Education, 26(1), 35–51.
13.
FlintT. (2010). Making meaning together: Buddy reading in a first grade classroom. Early Childhood Education Journal, 38(4), 289–297.
14.
FraserD. (2006). The creative potential of metaphorical writing in the literacy classroom. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 5(2), 93–108.
15.
FryeE., & TrathenW., & SchlagalB. (2010). Extending acrostic poetry into content learning: A scaffolding framework. The Reading Teacher, 63(7), 591–595. doi: 10.1598/RT.63.7.6.
16.
GillS. R. (2006). Teaching rimes with shared reading. The Reading Teacher, 60(2), 191–193. doi:10.1598/RT.60.2.9
17.
HammersleyM. (1992). Deconstructing the qualitative-quantitative divide. In BrannenJ. (Ed), Mixing methods: qualitative and quantitative research (pp.39–55). Brookfield: Avebury.
18.
HarrisonD. D., & HolderithK. (2003). Using the power of poetry to teach language arts, social studies, math and more: Engaging poetry lessons, model poems and writing activities that help students learn important content.New York: Scholastic.
19.
HeitmanJ. (2005). Poetry and literacy from A to Yea!. Library Media Connection, 23(4), 40.
20.
HopkinsL. B. (1987). The sea is calling me: Poems.San Diego, CA: Harcourt.
21.
JocsonK., BurnsideS., & CollinsM. (2006). Pens on the prize: Linking school and community through contest- inspired literacy. Multicultural Education, 14(2), 28–33.
22.
JonesB. (2010). Motivating and supporting English language learners with the poems of William Carlos Williams. Middle School Journal, 42(1), 16–20.
23.
KrippendorffK. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
24.
KucanL. (2007). “I” poems: Invitations for students to deepen literary understanding. The Reading Teacher, 60(6), 518–525. doi:10.1598/RT.60.6.2.
25.
MyersP. (1998). Passion for poetry. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 41(4), 262–271.
26.
NeumanS. (2007). Learning about life-through books. Early Childhood Today, 21 (4), 34–43.
27.
PartheniouG., & KarakitsiosA. (1996). Katagrafi tis thesis tis pedikis poisis sto nipiagogio 1989–1992. [Identifying the role of children poetry at kindergarten 1989–1992], Diadromes [Ways], 44, 267–272.
28.
PeskinJ. (2010). The development of poetic literacy during school years. Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 47(2), 77–103.
PitcherS. (2009). The great poetry race. The Reading Teacher, 62(7), 613–616.
31.
RosenblattL. (1976). Literature as exploration.New York: Barnes & Noble.
32.
RosenblattL. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem.Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
33.
RosenblattL. (1986). The aesthetic transaction. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 20(4), 122–128.
34.
RosenblattL. (2005). From “the poem as event”. Voices from the middle, 12(3), 48–50.
35.
SekeresD. D., & GreggM. (2007). Poetry in third grade: Getting started. The Reading Teacher, 60(5), 466–475. doi:10.1598/RT.60.5.6.
36.
SmithD. (2004). The poet, the child and the blackbird: Aesthetic reading and spiritual development. International Journal of Children's Spirituality, 9(2), 143–154.
