THIS ARTICLE INVESTIGATES PROCESSES of engagement in social pretend play between children with autism (age range 3.6 to 7.2 years) and adult play partners, using a large corpus of conversational data. We take a qualitative discourse analytic approach to investigate the metacommunicative strategies used by the children. Our initial framework for exploring these issues is Giffin's (1984) model of verbal and nonverbal metacommunication in sociodramatic pretend play, and we develop this model further by proposing a cline of engagement along which we situate the children in our study. We found that, while all the children do participate in pretend play, and engage with the adult play partners to at least some extent, the children vary in the range of metacommunicative strategies they use, and in the degree to which they negotiate the creation of play sequences with their interlocutor. Furthermore, even for the most competent children, the metacommunication exhibits atypical characteristics.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychiatric Association (APA) (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, DSM-IV-TR Fourth Edition (Text Revision). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.
2.
AspergerH.; translated and annotated by FrithU. (1991) [1944]. ‘Autistic psychopathy’ in childhood. In FrithU., Autism and Asperger syndrome (pp. 37–92). Cambridge: C.U.P.
3.
AuwarterM. (1986). Development of communicative skills: The construction of fictional reality in children's play. In Cook-GumperzJ., CorsaroW. A. & StreeckJ. (Eds), Children's worlds and children's language (pp. 205–230). NY: Mouton de Gruyter.
4.
BatesonG. (1951). Information and codification: A philosophical approach. In BatesonG. & ReuschJ. (Eds), Communication: The social matrix of psychiatry (pp. 168–211). NY: Norton.
5.
DouglasS. (2012). Understanding Actions, States, and Events: Verb learning in children with autism.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
6.
DouglasS., & StirlingL. (2012). Social pretend play in autism: negotiated shared pretence and collective intentionality. Unpublished manuscript.
7.
GiffinH. (1984). The Coordination of Meaning in the Creation of a Shared Make-believe Reality. In BrethertonI. (Ed), Symbolic play: the development of social understanding (pp. 73–100). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
8.
GöncüA. (1993). Development of intersubjectivity in the dyadic play of preschoolers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 8, 99–116.
9.
HobsonR. P. (2005). What puts the jointness into joint attention?. In EilanN., HoerlC., McCormackT. & RoesslerJ. (Eds), Joint Attention: Communication and Other Minds. Issues in Philosophy and Psychology (pp. 185–204). New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
HowesC. (1985). Sharing fantasy: Social pretend play in toddlers. Child Development56, 5, 1253–1258.
11.
HowesC., UngerO., & BeizerSeidner L. (1989). Social pretend play in toddlers: Parallels with social play and with solitary pretend. Child Development60, 1, 77–84.
12.
JarroldC. (2003). A review of research into pretend play in autism. Autism, 7, 379–390.
13.
JarroldC., BoucherJ., & SmithP. (1996). Generativity Deficits in Pretend Play in Autism. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 14, 275–300.
14.
JarroldC., CarruthersP., SmithP. P., & BoucherJ. (1994). Pretend play: Is it metarepresentational?Mind and Language, 9, 4, 445–468.
15.
LewisV., & BoucherJ. (1988). Spontaneous, instructed and elicited play in relatively able autistic children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6, 4, 325–339.
16.
JordanR. (2003). Social play and autistic spectrum disorders: A perspective on theory, implications and educational approaches. Autism7, 347–360.
KavanaughR. R., & HarrisP. L. (1994). Imagining the outcome of pretend transformations: Assessing the competence of normal and autistic children. Developmental Psychology, 30, 847–854.
19.
MacWhinneyB. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20.
MifsudJ., KellyR., DissanayakeC., & LeekamS. (2009). Symbolic play in high-functioning autism: How ‘playful’ is their play?Poster presented at the International Meeting for Autism Research, Chicago, 7–9 May, 2009.
21.
NielsenM., & DissanayakeC. (2000). An investigation of pretend play, mental state terms, and false belief understanding: In search of a metarepresentational link. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18, 609–624.
22.
PiagetJ. (1962). Play, dreams and imitation in childhood.NY: Mouton.
23.
RakoczyH. (2008). Pretence as individual and collective intentionality. Mind and Language, 23, 5, 499–517.
24.
SawyerK. (1993) The pragmatics of play: Interactional strategies during children's pretend play. Pragmatics3, 3, 259–282.
25.
ScarboroughH. S. (1990). Index of Productive Syntax. Applied Psycholinguistics11, 1–22.
26.
SchoplerE., ReichlerR., & RennerB. (1988). The Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
27.
SchulerA., & FletcherC. (2002). Making communication meaningful: Cracking the language interaction code. In GabrielsR. & HillD. (Eds), Autism: From research to individualized practice (pp. 41–52). London: Jessica Kingsley.
28.
SigmanM., & RuskinE. (1999). Continuity and change in the social competence of children with autism, Down syndrome, and developmental delays. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 64, 1–114.
29.
WalenskiM., Tager-FlusbergH., & UllmanM.T. (2006). Language in autism. In MoldinS. O. & RubensteinJ. L. R. (Eds), Understanding autism: From basic neuroscience to treatment (pp. 175–203). Boca Raton, FL: Taylor and Francis Books.
30.
WingL., & GouldJ. (1979). Severe Impairments of Social Interaction and Associated Abnormalities in Children: Epidemiology and Classification. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 9, 11–29.
31.
WolfbergP. (2009). Play & Imagination in Children with Autism, 2nd Edition. New York: Teachers College.
32.
World Health Organization. (1992). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioral disorders. Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines.Geneva: WHO.
33.
World Health Organization. (1993). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioral disorders. Diagnostic criteria for research.Geneva: WHO.
