THE NATIONAL QUALITY FRAMEWORK (NQF) has been heralded by the Australian Government as a significant reform that will raise the quality of early childhood education and care (ECEC) across the country. Drawing on Foucault's (1991) conceptualisation of governmentality this article critically analyses the NQF. From this analysis we conclude that while overall, children in ECEC settings across Australia will be somewhat better off, the NQF nonetheless falls well short of its intended outcomes. Sumsion's (2006) conceptual framework for political activism in the ECEC sector is used to propose one way forward for early childhood advocates and activists to work for policy reform that may more effectively meet the Government's goal of giving children the best possible start in life. Central to our proposal is what we believe is currently lacking in early childhood policy: a bold, innovative vision for children's right to a high-quality early education.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AtkinsonS. (2008). ‘Indigenous self-determination and early childhood education and care in Victoria’. Unpublished PhD Thesis: University of Melbourne.
2.
AtkinsonS. (2011). What Indigenous families expect from the early childhood sector. Keynote presentation at the Social Justice in Early Childhood Annual Conference, Throwing the Baby Out with the Bath Water 8, June 4.
Australian Community Children's Services (ACCS). (2011). Media release 30.11.11:‘Community children's services celebrate the National Quality Reforms with Minister’ Peter Garrett, retrieved 13/12/2011 from http://www.ausccs.org.au/content.cfm?content=83.
5.
Australian Council of State School Organisations. (2011). About the Australian Council of state school organisations. Retrieved 06/06/2011 from http://www.acsso.org.au/about/.
CheesemanS., & TorrJ. (2009). From ideology to productivity: Reforming early childhood education and care in Australia. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 3(1), 61–74.
CoxE. (2006). Funding children's services. In HillE., PocockB. & ElliottA. (eds), Kids count: Better early childhood education and care in Australia (pp. 272–288). Sydney: Sydney University Press.
DeanM. (1999). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society.London: Sage.
22.
Department of Education and Children's Services. (2011). Assessing for learning and development in the early years using observation scales: Reflect, respect, relate.Adelaide: Government of South Australia.
Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). (2010d). Information Paper on the Education and Care Services National Law and the proposed National Regulations.Canberra: DEEWR.
FenechM., HarrisonL., PressF., & SumsionJ. (2010). Contributors to quality long day care: Findings from six case study centres.Bathurst: Charles Sturt University.
35.
FenechM., HarrisonL., & SumsionJ. (2011). Parent users of high quality long day care: Informed consumers of child care?Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 36(1), 95–103.
36.
FenechM., SumsionJ., & GoodfellowJ. (2006). The regulatory environment in long day care: A ‘double-edged sword’ for early childhood professional practice. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 31(3), 49–58.
37.
FenechM., SumsionJ., & GoodfellowJ. (2008). Regulation and risk: Early childhood education and care services as sites where the ‘laugh of Foucault’ resounds. Journal of Education Policy, 23(1), 35–48.
38.
FoucaultM. (1991). Governmentality. In BurchellG., GordonC. & MillerP. (eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87–104). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
39.
FoucaultM. (1994). Power. In FaubionJ. D. (ed.). Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984 Volume 3.London: Penguin Books.
40.
GordonC. (1991). Governmental rationality: An introduction. In BurchellG., GordonC. & MillerP. (eds), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 1–52). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
HutchinsT., & FrancesK. (2009). Australian Indigenous perspectives on quality assurance in children's services. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 34(1), 10–19.
MartinK. (2008). Young citizens and new citizenships beyond ‘The Apology’: Different spaces with the same challenges? Paper presented at the Honoring the Child, Honoring Equity 8: Young citizen(s), New Citizenship(s) conference. University of Melbourne.
PressF. (2006). What about the kids: Policy directions for improving the experiences of infants and young children in a changing world.Sydney: Crown in right of the State of New South Wales, the State of Queensland and the national Investment for the Early Years.
49.
PressF., & SkattebolJ. (2007). Early childhood activism, minor politics and resuscitating vision: A tentative foray into the use of ‘intersections’ to influence early childhood policy. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 8(3), 180–191.
50.
PressF., & WoodrowC. (2005). Commodification, corporatisation and children's spaces. Australian Journal of Education, 49(3), 278–291.
51.
Productivity Commission. (2011). Early Childhood Development Workforce: Productivity Commission Draft Research Report.Melbourne: Productivity Commission.
52.
RajkovicM., ThompsonD., & ValentineK. (2010). Post-diagnosis support for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder, their families and carers.Canberra: Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs.
53.
Siraj-BlatchfordI., & ManniL. (2007). Effective leadership in the early years sector: The ELEYS study.London: Institute of Education, University of London.
54.
SumsionJ. (2006). From Whitlam to economic rationalism and beyond: A conceptual framework for political activism in children's services. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 31 (1), 1–9.
55.
SumsionJ., & GoodfellowJ. (2009). Parents as consumers of early childhood education and care: The feasibility of demand-led improvements to quality. In KingD. & MeagherG. (eds), Paid care in Australia: Politics, profits, practices (pp. 167–202). Sydney: Sydney University Press.
56.
TaylerC., WillsM., HaydenJ., & WilsonC. (2006). A review of the approach to setting national standards and assuring the quality of care in Australian child care services.Kelvin Grove: Queensland University of Technology.
57.
ten BrummelaarJ. (2011). DEEWR information session on the National Quality Framework. Public communication: March 14, 2011.
58.
UNICEF. (2008). The child care transition: A league table of early childhood education and care in economically advanced countries.Florence: The United Nations Children's Fund.
