THIS PAPER FOCUSES ON VERY young students' ability to engage in repeating pattern tasks and identifying strategies that assist them to ascertain the structure of the pattern. It describes results of a study which is part of the Early Years Generalising Project (EYGP) and involves Australian students in Years 1 to 4 (ages 5 – 10). This paper reports on the results from the early years' cohort (Year 1 and 2 students). Clinical interviews were used to collect data concerning students' ability to determine elements in different positions when two units of a repeating pattern were shown. This meant that students were required to identify the multiplicative structure of the pattern. Results indicate there are particular strategies that assist students to predict these elements, and there appears to be a hierarchy of pattern activities that help students to understand the structure of repeating patterns.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BalakrishnanJ. D., & AshbyF. G. (1992). Subitizing: Magical numbers or mere superstition?Psychological Research, 54, 80–90.
2.
ClementJ. (2000). Analysis of clinical interviews: Foundations and model viability. In KellyA. & LeshR. (Eds), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 547–589). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3.
ClementsD. (2007). Curriculum research: Towards a framework for research based curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 35–70.
4.
FleerM. (2010). Early learning and development: Cultural-historical concepts in play.Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
5.
FreudenthalH. (1983). Didactical phenomenology of mathematical structures.Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
6.
GlaserB., & StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research.Chicago: Aldine.
7.
LamonS. (1994). Ratio and proportion: Cognitive foundations in unitizing and norming. In GuershonH. & ConfreyJ. (Eds), The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp 89–121). New York: State University of New York Press.
8.
LeshR., PostT., & BehrM. (1988). Proportional reasoning. In HiebertJ. & BehrM. (Eds), Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (pp. 93–118). Reston, VA: Lawrence Erlbaum & National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
9.
LiljedahlP. (2004). Repeating pattern or number pattern: The distinction is blurred. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 26(3), 24–42.
10.
LoJ-J., & WatanabeT. (1997). Developing ratio and proportion schemes: A story of a fifth grader. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(2), 216–236.
11.
MulliganJ. T., & MitchelmoreM., (2009). Awareness of pattern and structure in early mathematical development. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21(2), 33–49.
12.
MulliganJ. T., MitchelmoreM., & PrescottA., (2006). Integrating concepts and processes in early mathematics: The Australian Pattern and Structure Awareness Project (PASMAP). In NovotnáJ., MoraováH., KratkáM. & StehlikováN. (Eds) Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Prague (Vol. 4, pp. 209–216). Prague: PME.
PapicM. (2007). Mathematical patterning in early childhood: an intervention study.Macquarie University: Unpublished thesis.
15.
PapicM., & MulliganJ. T. (2007). The growth of early mathematical patterning: An intervention study. In WatsonJ. & BeswickK. (Eds), Mathematics: Essential research, essential practice. Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Hobart, Vol. 2, pp. 591–600. Adelaide: MERGA.
16.
PirieS. E. B. (1998). Crossing the gulf between thought and symbol: Language as (slippery) steppingstones. In SteinbringH., BussiM.G. Bartolini, and SierpinskaA. (Eds), Language and communication in the mathematics classroom (pp. 7–29). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
17.
Queensland Studies Authority (2005). Years 1 to 10 mathematics support material: Elaborations for levels 1 to 6 outcomes.Brisbane: Queensland Studies Authority.
18.
SaramaJ., & ClementsD. H. (2009). Early childhood mathematics education research: Learning trajectories for young students.London: Routledge.
19.
SimonM., & TzurR. (2004) Explicating the role of mathematical tasks in conceptual learning: An elaboration of the hypothetical learning trajectory. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6, 91–104.
20.
TartreL. (1990). Spatial orientation skill and mathematical problem solving. Journal in Research in Mathematics Education, 21(2), 216–299.
21.
ThrelfallJ. (1999). Repeating patterns in the primary years. In OrtonA. (Ed), Pattern in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 18–30). London: Cassell.
22.
VergnaudG. (1988). Multiplicative structures. In HiebertJ. & BehrM. (Eds), Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (pp. 141–161). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
23.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
WarrenE. (2005). Patterns supporting the development of early algebraic thinking. In ClarksonP., DowntonA., GronnD., HorneM., McDonoughA., PierceR. & RocheA. (Eds), Building connections: Research, theory and practice. Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Melbourne, pp. 759–766. Sydney: MERGA.
25.
WarrenE., & CooperT. J. (2007). Repeating patterns and multiplicative thinking: Analysis of classroom interactions with 9 year old students that support the transition from known to the novel. Journal of Classroom Instruction, 41(2), 7–11.
26.
WarrenE., & CooperT. J. (2008). Generalising the pattern rule for visual growth patterns: Actions that support 8 year olds' thinking. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67, 171–185.
27.
WarrenE., & MillerJ. (2010). Exploring four year old Indigenous students' ability to pattern. International Research in Early Childhood Education, 1(2), 42–56.
28.
ZazkisR., & LiljedahlP. (2002). Generalization of patterns: The tension between algebraic thinking and algebraic notation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(3), 379–402.
