EARLY INTERVENTION LITERATURE STRONGLY advocates transdisciplinary approaches as the ‘best practice’ model for interprofessional teamwork, and, along with benefits for families and teams, identifies factors that can make transdisciplinary approaches more or less effective. One of these factors is the challenge posed to team effectiveness by perceptions of professional ‘status’ differences among transdisciplinary team members. However, there has been very little focus upon the issues that may face early childhood staff (trained or untrained) working in transdisciplinary teams, although they are playing an increasingly critical role in these teams. Our paper presents findings from a small descriptive research project exploring professionals' experiences of transdisciplinary teamwork in a play-based early childhood early intervention program in Australia. While our study findings support some existing knowledge regarding effective transdisciplinary teamwork, we also indicate some new issues relating to professional status issues concerning early childhood staff, and the role of play itself in early childhood early intervention settings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AtwoolN. (2003). If it's such a good idea, how come it doesn't work: the theory and practice of integrated service delivery. Childrenz Issues7(2), 31–35.
2.
Blue-BanningM., SummersJ. A., FranklandH. C., NelsonL. L., & BeegleG. (2004). Dimensions of family and professional partnerships: Constructive guidelines for collaboration. Exceptional Children, 70(2), 167–184.
3.
ChengM-F., & JohnsonJ. (2010). Research on children's play: Analysis of developmental early education journals from 2005 to 2007. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37(4), 249–259.
4.
ColmerK. (2008). Multi disciplinary ‘teams’ are deliberately constructed. Reflections, Autumn, 8–10.
5.
CreswellJ. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd edn). London: Sage.
6.
CummingT., & WongS. (2008). SDN PlayLinks: Dimensions of a relationships-based service: The fifth of eight reports investigating SDN's Child, Family and Children's Services Programs. Sydney, Australia: SDN Children's Services.
DoyleM. B. (1997). The paraprofessional's guide to the inclusive classroom: Working as a team.Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
9.
DrennanA., WagnerT., & RosenbaumP. (2005). Keeping current in… The ‘key worker’ model of service delivery. Retrieved 25 March, 2007, from: http://www.canchild.ca/Default.aspx?tabid=130
10.
EdwardsA. (2009). Relational agency in collaborations for the well-being of children and young people. Journal of Children's Services, 4(1), 33–44.
11.
GarlandC. W., McGonigelM. J., FrankA., & BuckD. (1989). Transdisciplinary arena assessment process: A resource for teams.Norge, VA: Child Development Resources.
12.
GoodfellowJ. (2003). Practical wisdom in professional practice: The person in the process. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 4(1), 48–63.
13.
JohnstonL., & SullivanK. (2004). Evaluation of the Uniting Care Burnside Orana Supported Playgroups program, Parramatta (NSW): UnitingCare Burnside.
14.
JorgensenD. L. (1989). Participant observation: A methodology for human studies.Newbury Park: Sage.
15.
KimA-E., VaughnS., ElbaumB., HughesM. T., SloanC. V. M., & SridharD. (2003). Effects of toys or group composition for children with disabilities: A synthesis. Journal of Early Intervention, 25(3), 189–205.
LiamputtongP. (2007). Researching the vulnerable: A guide to sensitive research methods.London: Sage.
18.
McGonigelM. J., WoodruffG., & Roszmann-MillicanM. (1994). The transdisciplinary team: A model for family-centered early intervention. In JohnsonL. J., GallagherR.J., LaMontagneM. J., JordanJ. B., GallagherJ. J., HutingerP. L., & KarnesM. B. (Eds). Meeting early intervention challenges: Issues from birth to three (2nd edn), (pp. 95–131). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
19.
MalinN., & MorrowG. (2008). Evaluating Sure Start: Interprofessionalism and parental involvement in local programmes.London: Whiting & Birch.
20.
MilesM. B., & HubermanA. M. (2004). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
MooreT. (2005). What do we need to know to work effectively with young children and families? Towards a core curriculum. Paper presented at the 9th Australian Institute of Family Studies Conference, Melbourne.
22.
MooreT. (2008). Evaluation of Victorian children's centres: Literature review.Melbourne: The Centre for Community Child Health.
NicholsS., & JurvansuuS. (2008). Partnership in integrated early childhood services: An analysis of policy framings in education and human services. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 9(1), 117–130.
25.
OreloveF. P., & SobseyD. (Eds). (1996). Educating children with multiple disabilities: A transdisciplinary approach.Baltimore: Brookes.
26.
PilkingtonK. O., & MalinowskiM. (2002). The natural environment II: Uncovering deeper responsibilities within relationship-based services. Infants and Young Children, 15(2), 78–84.
RodgerS., & ZivianiJ. (1999). Play-based Occupational Therapy. International Journal of Disability, Development & Education, 46(3), 337–365.
30.
Siraj-BlatchfordI., & Siraj-BlatchfordJ. (2009). Improving development outcomes for children through effective practice in integrating early years services.London: Centre for Excellence and Outcomes in Young People's Services.
31.
WhalleyM. (2006). Leadership in integrated centres and services for children and families. A community development approach: engaging with the struggle. Childrenz Issues, 9(2), 8–13.
32.
WillisJ. (2007). Foundations of qualitative research: Interpretative and critical approaches.London: Sage.
33.
WongS., & CummingT. (2008). Practice grounded in theory: The theoretical and philosophical underpinnings of SDN's Child, Family and Children's Services Programs. The second of eight reports investigating SDN's Child, Family and Children's Services Programs. Sydney, Australia: SDN Children's Services.
34.
WongS. (2009). Tales from the frontline: The experiences of early childhood practitioners working with an ‘embedded’ research team. Evaluation and Program Planning, 32(2), 99–108.
