A GROWING BODY OF LITERATURE argues that integrated services, where a range of professionals including early childhood professionals work together in teams, offer a potentially highly effective strategy for providing families with access to a range of services in a seamless ‘joined-up’ way. Some have cautioned, however, that early childhood pedagogy and professionals within such hybrid services are in danger of being marginalised. Despite the growing literature suggesting strategies for supporting interprofessional teamwork in integrated services, there are relatively few empirical studies of how such teams operate in practice in Australian contexts. This paper reports on findings from a project funded by the Professional Support Coordinators Alliance (PSCA), that investigated, through a survey (n = 25) and case studies (n = 10), the experiences of professionals in integrated services across Australia and their perspectives on factors that contribute to the success of these services and to interprofessional working. The findings indicate that the early childhood professionals who participated in the study are generally optimistic about these services and about working in interprofessional teams.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnningA., CottrellD., FrostN., GreenJ., & RobinsonM. (2006). Developing multiprofessional teamwork for integrated children's services.Maidenhead: Open University.
BraunV., & ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
4.
BroadheadP., MeleadyC., & DelgadaM. A. (2008). Children, families and communities: creating and sustaining integrated services.Maidenhead: Open University Press.
5.
CheesemanS. (2007). Pedagogical silences in Australian early childhood social policy. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood8(3), 244–254.
6.
CorterC., PatelS., PelletierJ., & BertrandJ. (2008). The Early Development Instrument as an evaluation and improvement tool for school-based, integrated services for young children and parents: the Toronto First Duty Project. Early Education and Development, 19(5), 773–794.
7.
CummingT., & WongS. (2012). Professionals don't play: challenges for early childhood educators working in a transdisciplinary early intervention team. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 32(1), 127–135.
KellyB. (2003). Working together to support children who have intellectual disabilities, and their families. Childrenz Issues, 7(3), 50–55.
12.
LatherP. (2009). Against empathy, voice and authenticity. In JacksonA. & MazzeiL. (Eds), Voice in qualitative inquiry: challenging conventional, interpretative, and critical conceptions in qualitative research (pp. 17–26). London: Routledge.
13.
MalinN., & MorrowG. (2008). Evaluating Sure Start: interprofessionalism and parental involvement in local programmes.London: Whiting & Birch.
14.
MazzeiL. A., & JacksonA. J. (2009). (Eds). Voice in qualitative inquiry: challenging conventional, interpretative, and critical conceptions in qualitative research.London: Routledge.
MossP. (2003). Rethinking public provision for children. Childrenz Issues, 7(2), 24–30.
17.
NicholsS., & JurviansuuS. (2008). Partnership in integrated early childhood services: an analysis of policy framings in education and human services. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 9(2), 118–130.
18.
ØdegårdA. (2006). Exploring perceptions of interprofessional collaboration in child mental health care. International Journal of Integrated Care, 6(4), 1–13.
RhodesC., ScheeresH., & IedemaR. (2010). Triple trouble: undecidability, identity and oraganizational change. In Caldas-CoutlhardC. & IedemaR. (Eds) Identity trouble: critical discourse and contested identities (pp. 229–249). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
21.
RobinsonM., AtkinsonM., & DowningD. (2008). Supporting theory building in integrated services research.Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.
Toronto First Duty (2008). Informing full day learning: lessons from the TFD research at the Bruce/WoodGreen Early Learning Centre. Submission to the Early Learning Advisor on Full Day Learning. Toronto, Ontario: Toronto First Duty. Retrieved 24 July, 2010, from http://www.toronto.ca/firstduty/tfd_submission_to_ela.pdf.
24.
VecchioR. P., HearnG., & SoutheyG. (1994). Organisational behaviour: life and work in Australia.Sydney: Harcourt Brace.
25.
WhalleyM. (2006). Leadership in Integrated Centres and Services for Children and Families. A Community Development Approach: Engaging with the struggle. Childrenz Issues (10)2, 8–13.
