THIS ARTICLE SUPPORTS THE claim that there are strong interactive links between children's language development, cognitive reasoning and their success in school achievement. These links are best facilitated within a social learning framework where children's language and talk is encouraged, accepted and respected. This talk is the most authentic place to begin the adult dialogue with children that is purposeful and designed to build the vocabulary, concepts and understandings of the topic being taught. Marion Blank's level of language analysis is explored along with suggestions to enhance children's level of expressive and receptive language. Blank's strategies have been shown to enhance children's literacy achievement as well as their ability to settle into a positive learning environment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarnettW. S. (2001). Preschool education for economically disadvantaged children: Effects on reading achievement and related outcomes. In NeumanS. B. & DickinsonD. K. (Eds), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 421–443). New York: Guilford Press.
2.
BarrettE., & HammondL. (2008). Early childhood education of children with specific language impairments. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 13, 145–160.
3.
BiermanK. L., NixR., GreenbergM. T., BlairC., & DomitrovichC. (2008). Executive functions and school readiness intervention: Impact, moderation, and mediation in the Head Start REDI program. Development and Psychopathology, 20, 821–843.
4.
BishopD., & LeonardL. (Eds) (2000). Speech and language impairments in children: Causes, characteristics, intervention and outcome.Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
5.
BlankM. (2002). Classroom discourse: A key to literacy. In ButlerK. & SillimanE. (Eds), Speaking, reading and writing in children with learning disabilities: New paradigms in research and practice (pp. 151–173). Malwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
BlankM., & FranklinE. (1980). Dialogue with preschoolers: A cognitive-based system of assessment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1, 150–227.
7.
BlankM., RoseS. A., & BerlinL. J. (2003). Preschool Language Assessment Instrument: The language of learning in practice (2nd edn). Austin, TX: Pro Ed.
8.
ByrneB., Fielding-BarnsleyR., & AshleyL. (2000). Effects of preschool phoneme identity training after six years: Outcome level distinguished from rate of response. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 659–667.
9.
CattsH. W., FeyM. E., ZhangX., & TomblinJ. B. (1999). Language basis of reading and reading disabilities: Evidence from a longitudinal investigation. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 331–361.
10.
CunninghamA. E., & StanovichK.E. (1997). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology, 33, 934–945.
11.
EliasG., HayI., HomelR. & FreibergK., (2006). Enhancing parent-child book reading in a disadvantaged community. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 31, 20–25.
12.
FarkasG., & BeronK. (2004). The detailed age trajectory of oral vocabulary knowledge: Differences by class and race. Social Science Research, 33, 464–497.
13.
GoswamiU., & BryantP. (2007). Children's cognitive development and learning: Primary review research survey 2/1a.Cambridge: University of Cambridge Faculty of Education.
14.
HallS. L., & MoatsL. C. (1999). Straight talk about reading: How parents can make a difference during the early years. Chicago, ILL: Contemporary Books.
15.
HartB., & RisleyT. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children.Baltimore: Brookes.
16.
HattieJ. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London and New York: Routledge.
17.
HayI., EliasG., Fielding-BarnsleyR., HomelR., & FriebergK. (2007). Language delays, reading delays and learning difficulties: Interactive elements requiring multidimensional programming. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 400–409.
18.
HayI., & Fielding-BarnsleyR. (2006). Enhancing the early literacy development of children at risk for reading difficulties. Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities, 3, 117–124.
19.
HayI., & Fielding-BarnsleyR. (2007). Facilitating children's emergent literacy using home shared reading: A comparison of two literacy models. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 30, 191–202.
20.
HayI., & Fielding-BarnsleyR. (2009). Competencies that underpin children's transition into early literacy. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 32, 148–162.
21.
HayI., & Fielding-BarnsleyR. (2010). Responding to the challenge of transiting children into effective literacy. In LěT., LěQ. & ShortM. (Eds), Language and literacy in a challenging world (pp. 209–222). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
22.
HayI., Fielding-BarnsleyR., & TaylorT. (2010). Facilitating young children's language and vocabulary development using a cognitive framework. He Kupu e-Journal, 2, 37–46. www.nztertiarycollege.ac.nz/HeKupu/
23.
MorganL., & GoldsteinH. (2004). Teaching mothers of low socioeconomic status to use decontextualized language during storybook reading. Journal of Early Intervention, 26, 235–252.
24.
MorrowL. M., & TraceyD. H. (2007). Best practices in early literacy development in preschool, kindergarten, and first grade. In GambrellL.B., MorrowL. M. & PressleyM. (Eds), Best practices in literacy education (3rd edn) (pp. 57–82). New York: Guilford Press.
25.
NationK. (2005). Connections between language and reading in children with poor reading comprehension. In CattsH. W. & KamhiA. G. (Eds), The connection between language and reading disabilities (pp. 55–75). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
26.
NeumanS. B., & DicksonD. K. (2001). Handbook of early literacy research.New York: Guilford Press.
27.
NuthallG. (2005). The cultural myths and realities of classroom learning: A personal journal. Teachers College Record, 107, 895–934.
28.
PaulR. (2007). Language disorders: From infancy through adolescence (3rd edn). St. Louis, MI: Mosby.
29.
ScarboroughH. S. (2005). Developing relationships between language and reading: Reconciling a beautiful hypothesis with some ugly facts. In CattsH. W. & KamhiA. G. (Eds), The connection between language and reading disabilities (pp. 3–24). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
30.
SénéchalM. (2006). Testing the home literacy model: Parent involvement in kindergarten is differently related to grade 4 reading comprehension, fluency and reading for pleasure. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 59–87.
31.
ShareD. L., & StanovichK. E. (1995). Cognitive processes in early reading development: Accommodating individual differences into a model of acquisition. Issues in Education: Contributions from Educational Psychology, 1, 1–57.
32.
SnowC. E., GriffinP., & BurnsM. S. (2006). Knowledge to support the teaching of reading.San Francisco: CA: Wiley.
33.
SnowP. C., & PowellM. B. (2008). Oral language competence, social skills and high-risk boys: What are juvenile offenders trying to tell us?Children and Society, 22, 16–28.
34.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
WasikB. A., BondM. A., & HindmanA. (2006). The effects of a language and literacy intervention on head start children and teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 63–74.
36.
WhitehurstG. J., ArnoldD. S., EpsteinJ. N., AngellA. L., SmithM., & FischelJ. E. (1994). A picture book reading intervention in day care and home for children from low-income families. Developmental Psychology, 30, 679–689.
37.
WinneP. H., & NesbitJ. C. (2009). The psychology of academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 653–678.
38.
WoolleyG., & HayI. (2007). Reading intervention: The benefits of using trained tutors. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 30, 9–20.
