NEW ZEALAND HAS AN INTERNATIONALLY unique approach to early childhood education, which includes a bicultural early childhood curriculum, a robust infrastructure of organisation and management overseen by the New Zealand Ministry of Education, and a growing reputation for innovation in early childhood teaching and learning. This paper examines how the current model of early childhood education emerged, the policy decisions that enabled current systems to be developed, the importance of the early childhood curriculum, teacher education and professional development, and recent developments during a time of recession in New Zealand. Some recommendations for early childhood education, based on the New Zealand experience, are proposed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Frank Porter Graham Child Development Center. (1999). Early learning, later success: The Abecedarian Study. Retrieved 15 January, 2010 from www.fpg.unc.edu.
2.
AdamsP., & BethellK. (2005). Shifting conceptions of education and educational institutions. In AdamsP., VosslerK. & ScrivensC. (Eds), Teachers' work in Aotearoa New Zealand (pp. 132–148). Southbank, Vic., Australia: Thomson Dunmore Press.
3.
AubreyC. (2004). Implementing the foundation stage in reception classes. British Educational Research Journal, 30(5), 633–656.
4.
BarnettW. S., JungK., YaroszD.J., ThomasJ., HornbeckA., StechukR. et al. (2008). Educational effects of the Tools of the Mind curriculum: A randomized trial. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 299–313.
5.
BernsteinB. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique.London: Taylor & Francis.
6.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
CookH. M. (1985). Mind that child: Childcare as a social and political issue in New Zealand.Wellington, NZ: Blackberry Press.
8.
CullenJ. (1996). The challenge of Te Whāriki for future development in early childhood education. Delta, 48(1), 113–25.
9.
CullenJ. (2003). The challenge of Te Whāriki: Catalyst for change? In NuttallJ. (Ed), Weaving Te Whāriki; Aotearoa New Zealand's early childhood curriculum document in practice (pp. 269–296). Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
10.
CullenJ. (2008, November). Outcomes of Early Childhood Education: Do we know, can we tell, and does it matter? Herbison Lecture, NZARE conference, Massey University, Palmerston North.
11.
Department of Education (1988a). Education to be more.Wellington: Government Printer.
12.
Department of Education (1988b). Before five: Early childhood care and education in New Zealand.Wellington: Government Printer.
13.
Department of Education (1988c). Tomorrow's schools: The reform of education administration in New Zealand.Wellington: Government Printer.
14.
Education Review Office (ERO) (2004). Evaluation indicators for education reviews in early childhood services.Wellington: ERO.
15.
Education Review Office (ERO) (2010). Literacy teaching and learning in early childhood.Wellington, NZ: ERO.
16.
GolbeckS. L. (2001). Instructional models for early childhood: In search of a child-regulated/teacher-guided pedagogy. In GolbeckS. L. (Ed), Psychological perspectives in early childhood education (pp. 3–34). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17.
HughesB. (1989). Flags and building blocks, formality and fun: One hundred years of free kindergarten in New Zealand.Wellington: New Zealand Free Kindergarten Union.
18.
LoveridgeJ., & McLachlanC. (2009). Accountability and compliance versus diversity and democracy in early childhood education. In GeorgeA. St., BrownS. and O'NeillJ. (Eds), Facing the big questions in teaching: Purpose, power and learning (pp. 22–31). South Melbourne, Vic., Australia: Cengage Learning.
19.
MayH. (1997). The discovery of early childhood.Wellington, NZ: NZCER & Bridget Williams Books.
McCainM., & MustardJ. F. (1999). Early years study: reversing the real brain drain. Final report to the Government of Ontario, Canada. Retrieved 15 January 2010 from www.childsec.gov.on.ca.
22.
McLachlanC. J., CarvalhoL., KumarK., & de LautourN. (2006). Emergent literacy in early childhood settings in New Zealand. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 31(2), 31–41.
23.
McLachlanC., FleerM., & EdwardsS. (2010). Early childhood curriculum: Planning, assessment and implementation. Melbourne, Vic., Australia: Cambridge University Press.
24.
McLachlan-SmithC. J. (2001, December). The Quality Journey: preliminary analyses of implementation in 72 early childhood centres. Paper presented at the New Zealand Association for Research in Education Conference, Christchurch College of Education.
25.
Ministry of Education (1993). The New Zealand curriculum framework.Wellington: Learning Media.
26.
Ministry of Education (1996). Te Whāriki: Early Childhood Curriculum.Wellington: Learning Media.
27.
Ministry of Education (1998). Quality in action.Wellington, NZ: Learning Media.
28.
Ministry of Education (1999). The quality journey.Wellington, NZ: Learning Media.
29.
Ministry of Education (2002). Pathways to the future: Nga Huarahi Aratiki. A ten year strategic plan for early childhood education.Wellington: Learning Media.
30.
Ministry of Education (2004). Kei tua o te pae. Assessment for learning: Early childhood exemplars.Wellington: Learning Media.
NuttallJ. (2003). Exploring the role of the teacher within Te Whāriki: Some possibilities and contstraints. In NuttallJ. (Ed), Weaving Te Whāriki; Aotearoa New Zealand's early childhood curriculum document in practice (pp. 161–186). Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
41.
OsborneA. F., & MillbankJ. E. (1987). The effects of early education.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42.
SchweinhartL. J., & WeikartD. P. (1999). The advantages of High/Scope: Helping children lead successful lives. Educational Leadership, 57(1), 76–78.
43.
ScottD. (2008). Critical essays on major curriculum theorists.London: Routledge.
44.
StoverS. (2010). Managing the squeeze: Six responses to the funding cuts. Early Education, 48, Spring/Summer, 18–20.
45.
StoverS. (2011). Play's progress? Locating play in the educationalisation of early childhood in Aotearoa New Zealand. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, AUT University, Auckland.
46.
Tagoilelagi-LeotaF., McNaughtonS., MacDonaldS., & FerryS. (2005). Bilingual and biliteracy development over the transition to school. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 8(5), 455–479.
47.
Te OneS. (2003). The context for Te Whāriki: Contemporary issues of influence. In NuttallJ. (Ed), Weaving Te Whāriki: Aotearoa New Zealand's early childhood curriculum document in theory and practice (pp. 17–50). Wellington, NZ: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
48.
WylieC., HodgenE., HipkinsR., & VaughnK. (2009). Competent Learners on the edge of adulthood: A summary of key findings from the Competent Learners @ 16 project.Wellington: NZCER.
