BY ENGAGING POSTSTRUCTURAL, postmodern and indigenous lenses, this article explores challenges associated with recently developed ‘postmodern’ early childhood education curricula. The authors propose that curricula should not be seen as neutral, but rather as historically and politically situated documents that require dynamic and critical engagements from educators. We situate our analysis within Canada.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArnettJ. J. (2008). The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. American Psychologist, 63(7), 602–614.
2.
BennettJ. (2004). Starting strong curricula and pedagogies in early childhood education and care: Five curriculum outlines. OECD Directorate for Education. Retrieved 6 April, 2009 from www.oecd.org/dataoecd/23/36/31672150.pdf.
3.
Best Start Expert Panel on Early Learning (2007). Early learning for every child today: A framework for Ontario early childhood settings. Retrieved 6 April, 2009 from www.gov.on.ca/children/graphics/263264.pdf.
4.
BurmanE. (2009). Beyond ‘emotional literacy’ in feminist and educational research. British Educational Research Journal, 35(1), 137–155.
5.
CannellaG. S. (1997). Deconstructing early childhood education social justice and revolution.New York: P. Lang.
6.
DahlbergG., MossP., & PenceA.R. (1999). Beyond quality in early childhood education and care: Postmodern perspectives.London: Falmer Press.
7.
DusselI., TiramontiG., & BirginA. (2000). Towards a new cartography of curriculum reform: reflections on educational decentralization in Argentina. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(4), 537–559.
8.
Early Childhood Research and Development Team (2007). Early learning and child care: English curriculum framework for New Brunswick. Fredericton, New Brunswick: Family and Community Services.
9.
FendlerL. (2003). Teacher reflection in a hall of mirrors: Historical influences and political reverberations. Educational Researcher, 32(3), 16–25.
10.
Government of British Columbia (2008). British Columbia early learning framework.Victoria, BC: Ministry of Education, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Children and Family Development and British Columbia Early Learning Advisory Group.
11.
Lenz TaguchiH. (2008). An ‘Ethics of resistance’: Challenges taken-for-granted ideas in Swedish early childhood education. International Journal of Educational Research, 47(5), 270–282.
12.
LooneyA. (2001). Curriculum as policy: Some implications of contemporary policy studies for the analysis of curriculum policy, with particular reference to post-primary curriculum policy in the Republic of Ireland. Curriculum Journal, 12(2), 149–162.
13.
MacNaughtonG. (2003). Shaping early childhood: Learners, curriculum and contexts.Maidenhead: Open University Press.
14.
MossP. (2005). Curriculum and assessment in the early years [Special issue]. Children in Europe, 9.
15.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2003). Early Childhood Education and Care Policy: Canada Country Note. OECD Directorate for Education. Retrieved 22 June, 2006, from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/42/34/33850725.pdf.
16.
PenceA., & Hix-SmallH. (2009). Global children in the shadow of the global child. International Critical Childhood Policy Studies Journal, 2(1), 75–91.
17.
PinarW. F., ReynoldsW. M., SlatteryP., & TaubmanP. M. (2000). Understanding curriculum: An introduction to the study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses.New York: Peter Lang.
18.
Saskatchewan Ministry of Education (2008). Play and exploration: Early learning program guide. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan: Early Learning and Child Care Branch Ministry of Education.
19.
ThompsonD. (2010). A story to unsettle assumptions about critical reflection in practice. In Pacini-KetchabawV. (Ed), Flows, rhythms and intensities of early childhood education curriculum (pp. 77–94). NY: PeterLang.
20.
WeenieA. (2008). Curricular Theorizing From the Periphery. Curriculum Inquiry, 38(5), 545–557.
