EARLY CHILDHOOD TEACHER EDUCATION programs have a responsibility, amongst many, to prepare teachers for decision making on real world issues, such as child abuse and neglect. Their repertoire of skills can be enhanced by engaging with others, either face-to-face or online, in authentic problem-based learning. This paper draws on a study of early childhood student teachers who engaged in an authentic learning experience, which was to consider and to suggest how they would act upon a real-life case of child abuse encountered in an early childhood classroom in Queensland. This was the case of Toby (a pseudonym), who was suspected of being physically abused at home. Students drew upon relevant legislation, policy and resource materials to tackle Toby's case. The paper provides evidence of students grappling with the complexity of a child abuse case and establishing, through collaboration with others, a proactive course of action. The paper has a dual focus. First, it discusses the pedagogical context in which early childhood student teachers deal with issues of child abuse and neglect in the course of their teacher education program. Second, it examines evidence of students engaging in collaborative problem solving around issues of child abuse and neglect and teachers' responsibilities, both legal and professional, to the children and families they work with. Early childhood policy-makers, practitioners and teacher educators are challenged to consider how early childhood teachers are best equipped to deal with child protection and early intervention.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Australian Government/Australian Institute of Family Studies (AIFS) (2008). Australian child protection legislation 2004–5.Canberra, ACT: AIHW.
2.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) (2006). Child protection Australia.Canberra, ACT: AIHW.
3.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) (2009). Child protection Australia 2007–8.Canberra, ACT: AIHW.
4.
BaginskyM. (2000). Training teachers in child protection. Child Abuse Review, 9, 74–81.
BaginskyM. (2007). Schools, social services and safeguarding children.Leicester, UK: NSPCC.
7.
BaginskyM., & MacphersonP. (2005). Training teachers to safeguard children: Developing a consistent approach. Child Abuse Review, 14, 317–330.
8.
ChenP-L., ChungD. S., & CraneA. (2001). Pedagogy under construction: Learning to teach collaboratively. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, 56(2), 25–42.
9.
CoxB., & CoxB. (2008). Developing interpersonal and group dynamics through asynchronous threaded discussions: The use of discussion board in collaborative learning. Education, 175(4), 553–565.
10.
EdwardsS., & HammerM. (2006). Laura's story: Using problem based learning in early childhood and primary teacher education. Teaching and Teaching Education, 22, 465–477.
11.
EdwardsS., WatsonJ., FarrellA., & NashR. (2008). Delivering on the e-learning promise: A case for a learning environment that enables collaborative online problem solving (COPS). Formamente. Rivista Internazionale Di Ricerca Sul Futuro Digitale.111(1–2), 91–110.
12.
EllisR., GoodyearP., ProsserM., & O'HaraA. (2006). How and what university students learn through online and face-to-face discussion: Conceptions, intentions and approaches. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 244–256.
13.
FrancescatoD., MebaneM., PorcelliR., AttanasioC., & PulinoM. (2007). Developing professional skills through computer supported collaborative learning in university contexts. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65, 140–152.
14.
GoldmanJ. (2007). Primary school student-teachers' knowledge and understandings of child sexual abuse and its mandatory reporting. International Journal of Educational Research, 46, 368–381.
15.
International Society for Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect (ISPCAN) (2009). International Training Project of ISPCAN, Retrieved 14 December 2008 www.ispcan.org/ITPI/index.asp.
JonassenD. H. (1995). Constructivism and computermediated communication in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 1(2), 7–26.
18.
JonassenD. H., HowlandJ., MooreJ., & MarraR. M. (2003) Learning to solve problems with technology.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
19.
LaskeyL. (2005). Supporting learning and development throughout life. The College of Educational and Developmental Psychologists. Australian Psychological Society Victoria Annual Conference, Melbourne.
20.
LaskeyL. (2009). Training to safeguard: The Australian experience. In BaginskyM. (Ed), Safeguarding children and schools (pp. 166–178). London: Jessica Kingsley.
21.
LaurillardD. (2002). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies.London: RoutledgeFalmer.
22.
MathewsB., & KennyM. (2008). Mandatory reporting legislation in the United States, Canada, and Australia: A cross-jurisdictional review of key features, differences, and issues. Child Maltreatment, 13(1), 50–63.
23.
MathewsB., WalshK., ButlerD., & FarrellA. (2006). Mandatory reporting by Australian teachers of suspected child abuse and neglect: Legislative requirements and questions for future direction. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Law and Education, 11(2), 7–22.
24.
MathewsB., WalshK., RassafianiM., ButlerD., & FarrellA. (2009). Teachers reporting child sexual abuse: Results of a three-state study. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 32(3), 772–813.
25.
National Health and Medical Research Council (2007). Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research.Canberra: NHMRC.
26.
McKeeB., & DillenburgerK. (2010 in press). Child abuse and neglect: Training needs of student teachers. International Journal of Educational Research.
27.
O'NeilH., ChuangS., & ChungG. (2003). Issues in computer based assessment of collaborative problem solving. Assessment in Education, 10(3), 361–373.
28.
RosenbergM. J. (2001). E-learning: Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age.New York: McGraw-Hill.
29.
RustC., O'DonovanB., & PriceM. (2005). A social constructivist assessment process model: How the research literature shows us this could be best practice. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(3), 231.
30.
SaritasT. (2008). The construction of knowledge through social interaction via computer-mediated communication. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 9(1), 35–49.
31.
SaveryJ. R., & DuffyT. M. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35(5), 31–38.
32.
SBL® Interactive (2008). The use of SBLI scenarios in Australian high schools. Report of a workshop held at The University of Queensland, 15 April 2008. Retrieved 29 January 2009 http://scenarios.sblinteractive.org/playerframe.aspx.
33.
SlavinR. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research and practice.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
34.
SvetcovD. (2000). The virtual classroom vs. the real one. Forbes, 166(7), 50–52.
35.
TuttyJ. I., & KleinJ. D. (2007). Computer-mediated instruction: A comparison of online and face-to-face collaboration. Education Technology Research Development, 56, 101–124.
36.
VrasidasC. (2004). Issues of pedagogy and design in e-learning systems. Paper presented at the Symposium on Applied Computing, Nicosia, Cyprus.
37.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
WallenN., & FraenkelJ. (2005). How to design and evaluate research in education. (Sixth edn). New York: McGraw-Hill.
39.
WalshK., BridgstockR., FarrellA., RassafianiM., & SchweitzerR. (2008). Case teacher and school characteristics influencing teachers' detection and reporting of child physical abuse and neglect: Results from an Australian survey. Child Abuse & Neglect, 32, 983–993.
40.
WalshK., & FarrellA. (2008). Identifying and evaluating teachers' knowledge in relation to child abuse and neglect: A qualitative study with Australian early childhood teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 585–600.
41.
WebbR., & VulliamyG. (2001). The primary teacher's role in child protection. British Educational Research Journal, 27(1), 59–77.
42.
YamS. C. (2004). Distance education and E-learning in the digital age: Critical considerations. In ShihT. (Ed), Intelligent virtual world: Technologies and applications in distributed world environments (pp. 289–308). Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific Publishers.
