THE USE OF CHILDCARE SERVICES for very young children (birth to three years) has increased dramatically in the past two decades (Department of Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs, 2004). This article investigates the expectations for cultural continuity of caregiving practices (with particular emphasis on sleep and feeding) between home and the early childhood setting. Findings showed that 1. Parents hold expectations for the execution of caregiving practices; 2. Ongoing oral communication is seen as a support for understanding practices, and staff with the same cultural background as families are pivotal in this process; and 3. Concealed practices by staff may be the result of a lack of communication, or of staff responding to their own macro-cultural beliefs. Continuity of micro- and macro-cultural practices is dependent upon staff attitudes and the process of communication.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbbottS. (1992). Holding on and pushing away: Comparative perspectives on an Eastern Kentucky child rearing practice. Ethos(20), 33-65.
2.
Australian Government Department of Families Community Services and Indigenous Affairs. (2004). 2004 Australian Government census of child care services [Electronic Version]. Retrieved 20 November 2006, www.facsia.gov.au/internet/facsinternet.nsf/childcare/04_census.htm.
3.
BarnardK., HammondM. A., BoothC. L., BeeH. L., MitchellS. K., & SpiekerS. (1989). Measurement and meaning of parent-child interaction. Applied Developmental Psychology(3), 39-80.
4.
BerryJ. W., KimU., PowerS., YoungM., & BujakiM. (1989). Acculturaltion attitudes in plural societies. Applied Psychology(38), 185-206.
5.
BhavnagriN., & Gonzalez-MenaJ. (1997). The cultural context of infant caregiving. Childhood Education., 74(1), 2–7.
6.
BourdieuP. (1993). Sociology in question.London: Sage.
7.
BowlbyJ. (1988). A Secure Base: Clinical Applications of Attachment Theory.London: Routledge.
8.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development. Experiments by nature and design.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
BronfenbrennerU. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22, 723-742.
10.
CaudillW., & PlathD. W. (1966). Who sleeps by whom? Parent-child involvement in urban Japanese families. Psychiatry, 29, 344-366.
11.
ChangH. N. L., MuckelroyA., & Pulida-TobiassenD. (1996). Looking in, looking out: Redefining child care and early education in a diverse society.California: California Tomorrow.
12.
Commonwealth Department of Health and Family Services. (1998). Community centre based long day care handbook.Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Health and Family Services.
13.
De GioiaK. (2003). Beyond cultural diversity. Exploring micro and macro culture in the early childhood setting. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Western Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
14.
EbbeckM. (2001). Cultural continuities: An Australian perspective. Early Child Development and Care, 171, 33-46.
15.
ElkinF., & HandelG. (1989). The child and society. The process of socialization (5th ed.). New York: Random House.
16.
FarooquiS. I., PerryJ., & BeeversD. G. (1991). Ethnic differences in sleeping position and risk of cot death. The Lancet, 338(1445).
17.
FarverJ. A. M., NarangS. K., & BhadhaB.R. (2002). East Meets West: Ethnic Identity, Acculturation, and Conflict in Asian Indian Families. Journal of Family Psychology, 16(3), 338–350.
18.
Gonzalez-MenaJ. (2007). Diversity in early care and education: Honoring differences (5 edn.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
19.
GubaE.G., & LincolnY. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In DenzinN.K. & LincolnY.S. (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues (pp. 195-220). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
GubriumJ.F. & HolsteinJ.A. (Eds.) (2002). Handbook of interview research: Context and method.Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
21.
HandK., & WiseS. (2006). Parenting partnerships in culturally diverse child care settings: A care provider perspective. (Research paper/Australian Institute of Family Studies; n.36).
22.
HarknessS. (1980). The cultural context of child development. In HarknessS. (Ed.), Anthropological perspectives on child development. New direction for child development (Vol. 8, pp. 7-18). San Francisco: Freeman.
23.
HaydenJ., De GioiaK., & HadleyF. (2003). Enhancing partnerships and networks with culturally and linguistically diverse families in early childhood services: Final Report.Sydney: University of Western Sydney.
24.
Hesse-BiberS. (1995). Unleashing Frankenstein's monster? The use of computers in qualitative research. In BurgessR. G. (Ed.), Studies in qualitative methodology: Computing and qualitative research.London: Sage.
25.
HopkinsB. (1989). Culture, infancy and education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, IV(2), 289-293.
26.
HughesP., & MacNaughtonG. (1999). Who's the expert: Reconceptualising parent-staff relations in early education. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 24(4), 27–32.
27.
HughesP., & MacNaughtonG. (2000). Building equitable staff-parent communication in early childhood settings: An Australian case study.Paper presented at the Annual Conference and Exhibition of the Association for Childhood Education, Baltimore: April, 17-20.
28.
HughesP., & MacNaughtonG. (2001). Building equitable staff-parent communication in early childhood settings: An Australian case study. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 3(2), 1–15.
29.
KelleU., & LaurieH. (1995). Computer use in qualitative research and issues of validity. In KelleU. (Ed.), Computer-aided qualitative data analysis. (pp. 19-28). London: Sage.
30.
KochP. K., & McDonoughM. (1999). Improving parent-teacher conferences through collaborative conversations. Young Children, 54(2), 11–15.
31.
LeeR. M., & FieldingN. G. (1995). User's experiences of qualitative data analysis software. In KelleU. (Ed.), Computer-aided qualitative data analysis. (pp. 29-40). London: Sage.
32.
LotmanI. M. (1985). The poetics of everyday behaviour in eighteenth century Russian culture. In NakhimovskyA. D. & NakhimosvoskyA. S. (Eds.), (pp. 67-94). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
33.
MacNaughtonG. M. (2006). Respect for diversity: An international overview. Working paper 40.The Hague, The Netherlands: Bernard Van Leer Foundation.
34.
McBrideS. L. (1999). Family centred practices: Research in review. Young Children, 54(3), 62–70.
35.
McKimM. K. (2000). Choosing childcare for infants: Social, cultural and demographic influences and outcomes. In HaydenJ. (Ed.), Landscapes in early childhood education: Cross national perspectives on empowerment - A guide for the new millennium (pp. 133 - 152). New York: Peter Lang.
36.
MeadM. (1975). Growing up in New Guinea. (2nd edn.). New York: William Morrow.
37.
New South Wales Department of Community Services. (1998). Centre based and mobile child care services regulations (No 2) 1996. Under the Children's (Care and Protection) Act 1987. (Reprint No 2.). New South Wales: Department of Community Services.
38.
OwenT. M., WareA. M., & BarfootB. (2000). Caregiver-mother partnership behaviour and the quality of caregiver-child and mother-child interactions. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 15(3), 413–428.
39.
PeloA., & DavidsonF. (2003). Partnership building strategies. In CoppleC. (Ed.), A world of difference (pp. 75-80). Washington D.C: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
40.
ProvenceS., NaylorA., & PatersonJ. (1977). The challenge of day care.New Haven CT: Yale University Press.
41.
QSR International Pty Ltd. (2002). N6. (Non-numerical Unstructured Data Indexing Searching & Theorizing) qualitative data analysis program (Version 6 student version). Melbourne: QSR International Pty Ltd.
42.
RobinsonK. H., & Jones DiazC. (2007). Diversity and difference in early childhood education. Issues for theories and practice.Berkshire: Open University Press.
43.
RubinH. & RubinI. (1995). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44.
SchwandtT. (1994). Constructivist, interpretist approaches to human inquiry. In DenzinN. K. & LincolnY.S. (Eds), The landscape of qualitative researc: Theories and issues.Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
45.
St JohnW., & JohnsonP. (2000).The pros and cons of data analysis software for qualitative research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 32(4), 393–403.
46.
TakH. S., NieldM., & BeckerH. (1999). Use of computer software program for qualitative analyses-part 2: Advantages and disadvantages. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 21(3), 436–439.
47.
ThomasC. (1998). Culture defined: A twenty–first century perspective. Educational Horizons, 76(3), 122–126.
48.
ThomasD. R. (1986). Culture and ethnicity: Maintaining the distinction. Australian Journal of Psychology, 38(3), 371–380.
49.
TrevathanW. R., & McKennaJ. J. (1994). Evolutionary environments of human birth and infancy: Insights to apply to contemporary life. Children's Environments, 11, 88-104.
50.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
51.
WhitingtonV. (2004). Independence and interdependence in early childhood services. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 29(1), 14–21.
52.
WiseS. (2002). Parents' expectations, values and choice of child care: Connections to culture. Family Matters, 48-56.
53.
ZinzeletaE., & King LitteN. (1997). How do parents really choose early childhood programs. Young Children(November), 8-11.
