ALTHOUGH SEVERAL STUDIES have examined popular culture, the perspectives of young children from various cultures still have not been discussed at length in such studies. In order to listen to these children's voices, this paper focuses on young immigrant Korean girls in the United States. It particularly examines their interpretations of marriage in American popular culture — in this case as marriage presented in Disney animated films. It explores the Korean cultural value of family, which significantly influenced the informants' points of view toward marriage. Finally, the paper provides some suggestions and implications for research on popular culture and young children.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AliS. (2002) Friendship and fandom: Ethnicity, power and gendering readings of the popular. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 23(2), 153–165.
2.
AlvermannD., & XuS. (2003). Children's everyday literacies: Intersections of popular culture and language arts instruction. Language Arts: Popular Culture and Media Literacy, 81(2), 145–154.
3.
ÄnggårdE. (2005) Barbie princesses and dinosaur dragons: Narration as a way of doing gender. Gender and Education, 17(5), 539–553.
4.
ArmbristerR., McCallumS., & LeeH. (2002). A cross-cultural comparison of student social attributions. Psychology in the Schools, 39(1), 39–49.
5.
BellE., HassL., & SellsL. (1995). From mouse to mermaid: The politics of film, gender, and culture. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
6.
BellahR., MadsenR., SullivanW., SwidlerA., & TiptonS. (1996). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7.
BrookerL. (2003). Integrating new technologies in UK classrooms: Lessons for teachers from early years practitioners. Childhood Education, 79(5), 261–267.
8.
BuddM, & KirschM. (2005). Rethinking Disney: Private control, public dimensions.Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
CannellaG., & KincheloeJ. (Eds.). (2002). Kidworld: Childhood studies, global perspectives, and education. New York: Peter Lang.
11.
CarspeckenP. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide.New York: Routledge.
12.
CheungC. (2005) The relevance of media education in primary schools in Hong Kong in the age of new media: A case study. Educational Studies, 31(4), 361–374.
13.
DenzinN. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods.New York: McGraw-Hill.
14.
DerridaJ. (1976). Of grammatology.London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
15.
DockettS., PerryB., & NanlohyP. (1999). Computers in early childhood services: A part of the educational program or less them for play?Journal of Australian Research in Early Childhood Education, 6(2), 165–176.
16.
DonaldS. (2005) Little Friends: Children'sFilm and Media Culture in China. Landon: Rowman & Littlefield.
17.
DortnerK. (2001). Global media through youthful eyes. In LivingstoneS. & BovillM. (Eds.), Children and their changing media environment: A European comparative study (pp. 283–305). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18.
DysonA. (1997). Writing superheroes: Contemporary childhood, popular culture, and classroom literacy. New York: Teachers College Press.
19.
FiskeJ. (1992). Cultural studies and the culture of every day life. In GrossbergL., NelsonC., & TreichlerP. (Eds.), Cultural studies (pp. 154–173). New York: Routledge.
20.
GirouxH. (1995). Animating youth: The disneyfication of children's culture. Socialist Review, 24(3), 23–55.
21.
GirouxH. (1999). The mouse that roared: Disney and the end of innocence.New York: Rowman & Littlefiled.
22.
GlaserG. & StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Press.
23.
GlaubkeC., MillerP., ParkerM., & EspejoE. (2001). Fair Play? Violence, gender and race in video games. Children Now. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 463092)
24.
Gonzalez-MenaJ. (2001). Diversity in early care and education: Honoring differences. (4th ed.). Boston: McGraw Hill.
25.
GotzM., LemishD., AidmanA., & MoonH. (2005). Media and the make-believe worlds of children: When Harry Potter meets Pokémon in Disneyland.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
26.
GraueE. & WalshD. (1998). Studying children in context: Theories, methods, and ethics.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
HahnD. (1996). Animation magic: A behind-the scenes look at how an animated film is made.New York: Disney Press.
28.
HallS. (1980). Introduction to media studies at the centre. In HallS., HobsonD., LoweA., & WillisP., Culture, media, language (pp. 117–121). London: Hutchinson.
29.
HillM., LaybournA., & BorlandM. (1996). Engaging with primary-aged children about their emotions and well-being: Methodological considerations, Children and Society, 10, 129–144.
30.
KasturiS. (2002). Constructing childhood in a corporate world: Cultural studies, childhood, and Disney. In CanellaG. & KinchellaJ. (Eds.), Kid world: Childhood studies, global perspectives, and education (pp. 39–58). New York: Peter Lang.
31.
KimU., & ChoiS. (1994). Individualism, collectivism, and child development: A Korean perspective. In GreenfieldP. & CockingR. (Eds.), Cross-cultural roots of minority child development (pp. 227–257). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32.
LeeL. (2006). “Becoming an American princess?”: The Interpretations of American Popular Culture by Young Korean Girls Living in the United States. Unpublished dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.
33.
LeeL. (2008). Understanding gender through Disney's marriages: A study of young Korean immigrant girls. Early Childhood Education Journal, 38(1), 11–18.
34.
LeeL. & GoodmanJ. (2009). Traversing the challenges of conducting research with young immigrant children: The case of Korean children. Interchange, 40(2), 225–244.
35.
LemishD. (2007). Children and television: A global perspective.Malden, MA: Blackwell.
36.
LemishD., LiebesT., & SeidmannV. (2001). Gendered media meanings and uses. In LivingstoneS. & BovillM. (Eds.), Children and their changing environment: A European comparative study (pp. 263–282). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
LukeC. (1999). What next? Toddler netizens, playstation thumb, techno-literacies. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 1(1), 95–1000.
39.
MarshJ., & MillardE. (Eds.). (2006). Popular literacies, childhood and schooling.London: MauthnerM. (1997). Methodological aspects of collecting data from children: Lessons from three research projects, Children and Society, 11, 16–28.
40.
OlsenL. (1997). Made in America: Immigrant students in our public schools.New York: New Press.
41.
PykeK. (2000). The normal American family as an interpretive structure of family life among grown children of Korean and Vietnamese immigrants. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 240–255.
42.
RobertsonR. (1994). Globalization or globalization?The Journal of International Communication, 1(1), 33–52.
43.
RohnerR. P., & PettengillS. M. (1985). Perceived parental acceptance-rejection and parental control among Korean adolescents [Special issue]. Child Development, 56, 524–528.
44.
SpradleyJ. (1979). The ethnographic interview.New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
45.
SteinbergS., & KincheloeJ. (Eds.). (1997). Kinderculture: The corporate construction of childhood.Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
46.
TaxelJ. (1982). A literature review of the impact of Walt Disney Productions Inc. on American popular culture and children's literature. University of Georgia. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 213648)
47.
TobinJ. (2000). Good guys don't wear hats: Children's talk about the media.New York: Teachers College Press.
48.
TritesR. (1991). Disney's sub/version of Anderson's The Little Mermaid. Journal of Popular Film and Television, 18(4), 145–152.
49.
WalkerdineW. (1997). Daddy's girl: Young girls and popular culture.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
50.
WaskoJ. (2001). Understanding Disney: The manufacture of fantasy. Malden, MA: Polity.
51.
YellandN. (1998). Empowerment and control with technology in the early childhood years. Educational Practice and Theory, 20(2), 45–55.
