THIS ARTICLE REPORTS ON findings from a qualitative research project (Overton, 2006) that highlighted a lack of empowerment experienced by, with and for eight early childhood teachers working in Tasmanian schools. The study investigated how change affects teachers, and focused on the theme of power as experienced by these teachers. The study noted three dimensions of power relationships in teachers' work lives: power imposed upon teachers (i.e. top-down, bureaucratic power); empowerment for themselves and others (reactionary mechanisms across or between teachers in search of empowerment); and disempowerment (behaviours, events and actions that actively eroded teachers' sense of empowerment). This article outlines the ways in which these teachers were constrained, yet sought to self-enable, in their work contexts. Recommendations and implications are included in the discussion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AppleM. W. (1995). Education and power (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
2.
BallS. (1987). The micro-politics of the school: Towards a theory of school organization.London: Methuen.
3.
BatallanG. (2003). Power and authority at school: Conflict in school relationships from the perspective of Early Childhood teachers. Mexican Journal of Educational Research, 8(19), 679–705.
4.
BellL. (1994). When worlds collide: School culture, imposed change and teachers' work. In CrowtherF., CaldwellB., ChapmanJ., LakomskiG. & OgilvieD. (Eds.), The workplace in education, Australian perspectives: ACEA 1994 yearbook (pp. 52–59). Sydney: Edward Arnold.
5.
BourdieuP. (1986). Forms of capital.New York: New York Press.
6.
BranamanA. (Ed.). (2001). Self and society.Malden, MA: Blackwell.
7.
BritzmanD. B. (1997). The terrible problem of knowing thyself: Towards a poststructural account of teacher identity. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 9(3), 23–46.
8.
BrockP. (1998). Breaking some of the myths – again. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 21(1), 8–26.
9.
CheaterA. (Ed.). (1999). The anthology of power: Empowerment and disempowerment in changing structures.London: Routledge.
10.
ChurchillR., WilliamsonJ., & GradyN. (1997). Educational change and the new realities of teachers' work lives. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 25(2), 141–158.
11.
ClandininD. J., & ConnellyF. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12.
ClyneM. (1997). Language policy and education in Australia. In WodakR. & CorsonD. (Eds.), Language policy and political issues in education encyclodedia of language and education (Vol. 1). Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer.
13.
ColemanJ. (1988). Social Capital in the creation of Human CapitalThe American Journal of Sociology, 94 (Supplement. Organizations and Institutions: Sociological and Economic Approaches to the Analysis of Social Structure), S95–S120.
14.
DamasioA. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York: Harcourt Brace.
15.
DanielewiczJ. (2001). Teaching selves: Identity, pedagogy and teacher education.Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
16.
DavisJ., & WilsonS. M. (2000). Principals' efforts to empower teachers: Effects on teacher motivation and job satisfaction and stress. The Clearing House, 73(6), 349–354.
17.
DayC., FernandezA., HagueT. E., & MollerJ. (Eds.). (2000). The life and work of teachers: International perspectives in changing times. London: Falmer.
18.
DeeJ. R., HenkinA. B., & DruemerL. (2003). Structural antecedents and psychological correlates of teacher empowerment. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(3), 257–278.
Department of Education [DoE] (2002). Exploring effective literacy teaching and learning: A Tasmanian perspective. Hobart TAS: Printing Authority Tasmania.
23.
EasthopeC., & EasthopeG. (2000). Intensification, extension and complexity of teachers' work. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21(1), 43–59.
FullanM. (1998). The meaning of educational change: A quarter of a century of learning. In HargreavesA., LiebermanA., FullanM. & HopkinsD. (Eds.), International handbook of educational change (Vol. 1, pp. 214–228). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
26.
GeeJ. P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method.London: Routledge.
27.
GibbsC. (2003). Explaining effective teaching: Self efficacy and thought control of action. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 4(2), 1–14.
28.
GoodsonI. F. (1991). Sponsoring the teachers' voice: Teachers' lives and teacher development. Cambridge Journal of Education, 21(1), 35–45.
29.
GoodsonI. F. (1997). The life and work of teachers. In BiddleB. J., GoodT. L. & GoodsonI. F. (Eds.), International handbook of teachers and teaching (Vol. 1, pp. 135–152). Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer.
30.
HallingerP., BickmanL., & DavisK. (1996). School context, principal leadership and student reading achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 96(5), 527–549.
31.
HargreavesA. (1998a). The emotions of teaching and educational change. In HargreavesA., LiebermanA., FullanM. & HopkinsD. (Eds.), International handbook of educational change (Vol. 1, pp. 558–575). Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer.
32.
HargreavesA. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the age of insecurity.New York: Teachers College Press.
33.
HealyA. (Ed.). (2008). Multiliteracies and diversity in education.South Melbourne, Vic: Oxford.
34.
JamesW. (1999). Empowering ambiguities. In CheaterA. (Ed.), The anthology of power: Empowerment and disempowerment in changing structures (pp. 13–27). London: Routledge.
35.
JonesR. E. (1997). Teacher participation in decision-making - its relationship to staff morale and student achievement. Education, 118(1), 76–82.
36.
KnobelM., & HealyA. (Eds.). (1998). Critical literacies in the primary classroom. Newtown, NSW: Primary English Teaching Association.
37.
KvaleS. (1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
LankshearC., SnyderI., & GreenB. (2000). Teachers and technoliteracy: Managing literacy, technology and learning in schools. St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
39.
LortieD. C. (1998). Unfinished work: Reflections on Schoolteacher. In HargreavesA., LiebermanA., FullanM. & HopkinsD. (Eds.), The international handbook of educational change (Vol. 1, pp. 145–162). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
40.
MackenzieN. (2007). Teacher morale: More complex than we think?The Australian Educational Researcher, 34(1), 89–104.
41.
MacmillanR. B. (1999). Influences of workplace conditions on teachers' job satisfaction. The Journal of Educational Research, 93(1), 39–42.
42.
MaeroffG. I. (1989). The principles of teacher empowerment: Status, knowledge and access to decision making. The Education Digest, 54(6), 6–12.
43.
MidthassellU. V. (2004). Teacher involvement in school development activity and its relationships to attitudes and subjective norms among teachers: a study of Norwegian elementary and Junior High School teachers. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(3), 435–456.
44.
MisztalB. (1996). Trust in modern societies: The search for the bases of social order. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
45.
NiasJ. (1989). Primary teachers talking. A study of teaching as work.London: Routledge.
46.
NiasJ. (1998). Why teachers need their colleagues: A developmental perspective. In HargreavesA., LiebermanA., FullanM. & HopkinsD. (Eds.), International Handbook of Educational Change (Vol. 2, pp. 1257–1271). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
47.
O'BrienP., GoddardR., & KeeffeM. (2007). Burnout confirmed as a viable explanation for beginning teacher attrition. Paper presented at the AARE, www.aare.edu.au/07pap/abs07.htm#O
48.
OvertonJ. (2006). Teacher identity and power relationships in contexts of change: A case study of teachers. Unpublished PhD thesis, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
49.
PalmerP. J. (1997). The heart of a teacher: Identity and integrity in teaching. Change, 29(6), 14–22.
50.
PalmerP. J. (1998). The courage to teach.San Francisco: Josey-Bass.
51.
PolkinghorneD. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences.New York: State University of New York Press.
52.
RiceE. M., & SchneiderG. T. (1994). A decade of teacher empowerment: An empirical analysis of teacher involvement in decision making, 1980–1991.
53.
RogersW. A. (1992). Managing teacher stress.London: Pitman.
54.
SarasonS. B. (1996). Revisiting “The culture of the school and the problem of change”.New York: Teachers College Press
55.
ShortP. M., RinehartJ. S., & EckerlyM. (1999). The relationship of teacher empowerment and principal leadership orientation. Educational Research Quarterly, 22(4), 45–53.
56.
SmythJ. (2001). Critical politics of teachers' work: An Australian perspective.New York: Peter Lang.
57.
StakeR. E. (1995). The art of case study research.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58.
StraussA., & CorbinJ. (1999). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In BrymanA. & BurgessR. G. (Eds.), Qualitative research (Vol. 3, pp. 72–93). London: Sage.
59.
Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk-HoyA., & HoyW. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202–249.
60.
WeberM. (1986). Domination by economic power and by authority. In LukesS. (Ed.), Power (pp. 28–36). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell Ltd.
61.
WileyC. (2000). A synthesis of research on the causes, effects and reduction strategies of teacher stress. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 27(2), 80–91.
