THERE IS STILL RESISTANCE and hostility within some circles to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (the Convention), but professionals working with children should be familiar with rights principles and their use in advocating for change. A rights perspective fits well with the new paradigm of Childhood Studies, which is critical of developmental psychology and recognises multiple childhoods, children's agency and competency, and the primacy of children's lived experience. The Convention has been used in advocating for reforms in early childhood services in New Zealand. One example is the development and implementation of our early childhood education curriculum, Te Whariki. The second example is New Zealand's Strategic Plan for Early Childhood Education (Ngā Huarahi Arataki), which is focused on improving early childhood education quality and participation. It is argued that child advocacy for better early childhood education policies can be strengthened by the use of the Convention.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AldersonP. (2000). Young children's rights: Beliefs and practices.London: Jessica Kingsley.
2.
AlexanderG. (1995). Children's rights in their early years From plaiting fog to knitting treacle. In FranklinB. (Ed.), The handbook of children's rights (pp. 131–146). London Routledge.
3.
BarnettS. (1999). Long-term effects on cognitive development and school success. In BarnettW. S. & BoocockS. S. (Eds.), Early care and education for children in poverty: Promises, programs and long-term results (pp. 11–14) Albany, NY: State University of NewYork Press.
4.
BoshierP. F. (2005). The Care of Children Act: Does it enhance children's participation and protection rights?Childrenz Issues, 8(2), 7–19.
5.
BurmanE. (1996). Local, global or globalized? Child development and international child rights legislationChildhood, 3, 45–66.
6.
CarrM. (1998a) (Ed.) Assessing children's experiences in early childhood: Final report to the Ministry of Education. Part two case studies. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
7.
CarrM. (1998b). Technological practice in early childhood as a dispositional milieu. PhD thesis, University of Waikato.
8.
CarrM. (1999, 12–16 April). The four Ds: Assessing teachers as researchers in a research project on assessment in early childhood. Paper presented at the third Warwick International Early Years Conference, University of Warwick.
9.
CarrM. (2001). Assessment in early childhood settings: Learning stories.London: Paul Chapman.
10.
CarrM., LeeW., & JonesC. (2004). Children's contribution to their own assessment. Assessment for learning: Early childhood exemplars.Wellington: Ministry of Education, Learning Media.
11.
CarrM., HatherlyA., LeeW., & RamseyK. (2005). In NuttallJ. (Ed.), Weaving Te Whāriki’: Aotearoa New Zealand's early childhood curriculum document in theory and practice (pp. 187–213). [Palmerston North, New Zealand: Dunmore Press.]
12.
ClarkA. (2006). Listening to young children: Where will it lead? Paper presented at the 16th EECERA conference, Democracy and culture in early childhood education, University of Education, Reykjavik, 30 August- 2 September.
13.
ClarkA., & MossP. (2001). Listening to young children: The Mosaic approach.London: National Children's Bureau for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
14.
DahlbergG., & MossP. (1999). Beyond quality in early childhood education.London: Routledge.
15.
DoverborgE., & PramlingI. (1993). To understand children's thinking.Goteborg, Sweden: University of Göteborg.
16.
FreemanM. (1995). Children's rights in a land of rites. In FranklinB. (Ed.), The handbook of children's rights (pp. 70–88) London: Routledge.
17.
FreemanM. (1996). The importance of a children's rights perspective in litigation. Butterworths Family Law Journal, 2(4), 84–90.
18.
FreemanM. (1998). The sociology of childhood and children's rights, The International Journal of Children's Rights6, 433.
19.
JamesA., & ProutA. (Eds.) (1997). Constructing and reconstructing childhood: Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood.Basingstoke: Falmer Press.
JosephS. (2005). Teaching rights and responsibilities Paradoxes of globalization and children's citizenship in Lebanon. Journal of Social History, 8(4), 1007–1026.
22.
LangstedO. (1994). Looking at quality from the child's perspective. In MossP. & PenceA. (Eds.), Valuing quality in early childhood services: New approaches to defining qualiy.London: Paul Chapman.
23.
LudbrookR. (2000). Victims of tokenism and hypocrisy New Zealand's failure to implement the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. In SmithA. B., GollopM., MarshallK. & NairnK. (Eds.), Advocating for children: International perspectives on children's rights (pp. 109–125). Dunedin: University of Otago Press.
24.
MayH. (1999).The price of partnership: The before five decade. In ThruppM. (Ed.), Special issue: A decade of reform in New Zealand: Where to from now? New Zealand Journal for Educational Studies, 34(1) 18–27.
25.
MayallB. (Ed.) (1994). Children's childhoods: Observed and experienced.London: Falmer Press.
26.
MeadeA. (1990). Women and children gain a foot in the door. New Zealand Women's Studies Journal, 6.(1/2), 96–111.
27.
MeadeA. (2000). The early childhood landscape in New Zealand: ‘Before Five’. In HaydenJ. (Ed.), Landscapes in early childhood education (pp. 83–94). Washington: Peter Lang.
28.
MeltonG. (1987). Children, politics and morality: The ethics of child advocacy. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 16(4), 357–367.
29.
MeltonG. (2005). Treating children like people: A framework for research and advocacy. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34(4), 646–657.
30.
Ministry of Education (2002). Pathways to the future: Ngã huarahi arataki.Wellington: Learning Media.
31.
Ministry of Social Development (2002). New Zealand's agenda for children: making life better for children. Wellington.
32.
Ministry of Youth Affairs (2002). Youth development strategy aotearoa. Wellington.
33.
MossP., & PetrieP. (2002). From children's services to children's spaces: Public policy, children and childhood. London Routledge Falmer.
34.
PodmoreV., MayH., & MaraD. (1998). Evaluating early childhood programmes using the strands and goals of Te Whāriki, the national early childhood curriculum.Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
35.
PufallP. B., & UnsworthR. P. (2004). The imperative and the process for rethinking childhood. In PufallP. B. & UnsworthR. P. (Eds.), Rethinking childhood (pp. 1–21). New Brunswick, Canada: Rutgers University Press.
36.
PughG., & SelleckD.R. (1996). In DavieR., UptonG., & VarmaV. (Eds.), The voice of the child: A handbook for professionals (pp. 120–136). London: Falmer Press.
37.
QvortrupJ. (1994). Childhood matters: An introduction In Qvortrup et al. (Eds.), Childhood matters: Social theory, practice and politics, Aldeshot: Avebury.
38.
RizziniI., & ThaplyialN. (2005). The role of schools in the protection and promotion of children's rights in Brazil. Unpublished paper (submitted for publication).
39.
RogoffB. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context.London: Oxford University Press.
40.
SmithA. B. (2000). Children's rights and early childhood education: The rights of babies and young children. In SmithA. B., GollopM., MarshallK. & NairnK. (Eds.) Advocating for children: International perspectives on children's rights (pp. 191–205). Dunedin: University of Otago Press.
41.
SmithA. B. (2002). Interpreting and supporting participation rights: Contributions from sociocultural theory. International Journal of Children's Rights, 10, 73–88.
42.
SmithA. B., GrimaG., GaffneyM., & PowellK. (2000) Early childhood education: Literature review report to Ministry of Education.Dunedin: Children's Issues Centre.
43.
SmithA. B., & MayH. (2006). Early childhood care and education in Aotearoa – New Zealand. In MelhuishE. & PetrogiannisK. (Eds.), Early childhood care and education: International perspectives (pp. 95–114). London: Routledge.
44.
Stainton RogersW. (2004). Promoting better childhoods Constructions of child concern. In KehilyM.J. (Ed.), An introduction to childhood studies (pp. 125–144). Maidenhead Open University Press.
45.
Strategic PlanWorking Group (2001a). Consultation document for the development of the Strategic Plan for early childhood education.Wellington: Ministry of Education.
46.
Strategic PlanWorking Group (2001b). Final version. Strategic Plan for early childhood education.Wellington: Ministry of Education.
47.
TappP. (1998). Use of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child in the family court. In New Zealand Law Society (Eds.), Proceedings of the NZLS Family Law Conference (pp. 235–263). Christchurch: New Zealand Law Society.
48.
VygotskyL. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
49.
WoodheadM. (1996). In search of the rainbow: Pathways to quality in large-scale programmes for young children.The Hague: Bernard van Leer Foundation.
50.
WoodheadM. (1997). Psychology and the cultural construction of children's needs. In JamesA. & ProutA. (Eds.), Constructing and reconstructing childhood (pp. 63–77) Basingstoke: Falmer Press.
51.
WoodheadM. (2004). Foreword. In KehilyM.J. (Ed.), An introduction to childhood studies (pp. x–xi). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
