THIS PAPER REPORTS ON A STUDY designed to enhance knowledge and understanding of parent choice in relation to early childhood education and care (ECEC) services. It investigates the ways parents make their choices of early childhood services and examines and interprets the meanings they ascribe to those choices. An orthodox grounded theory analysis of interviews with parents was conducted to elicit the knowledge bases parents draw on as they make judgements about the early childhood services they access for their children. This investigation informs ECEC professionals about the variations in the ways parents make choices for their young children. Specifically, there is a strong sense of the influence of social context and existing beliefs and understandings. However, equally importantly, parent choice is also strongly influenced by more pragmatic concerns. Therefore, choice of ECEC service is both complex and pragmatic.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2002a). Australia now—a statistical profile: Income and welfare. Retrieved 20 May 2003, www.abs.gov.au.
2.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2002b). Labourforce, Australia. Retrieved 20 May 2003, www.abs.gov.au.
3.
BallS. (2003). The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Educational Policy, 18(2), 215–228.
4.
BennettT. (2001). Reactions to visiting the infant-toddler and preschool centers in Reggio Emilia, Italy. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 3(1), 20–26.
5.
BrannenJ., & MossP. (2003). Rethinking children's care.Buckingham: Open University Press.
6.
BrennanD. (1998). The politics of Australian child care: From philanthrophy to feminism and beyond.Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BrennanD. (1999). Children and Australian social policy. In BowesJ. & HayesA. (Eds.), Children, families and communities: Contexts and consequences (pp. 281–298). Melbourne Oxford University Press.
8.
ChaiklinS. (1993). Understanding the social scientific practice of ‘understanding practice’. In ChaiklinS. & LaveJ. (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 377–401). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Commonwealth Department of Family and Community Services (1999). Child Care in Australia: An update of key statistics relating to the Commonwealth Childcare Program. Retrieved 24 June 2003, www.facs.gov.au.
10.
Commonwealth Government (2004). National agenda for early childhood: A draft framework.Canberra: Australian Government Printing.
11.
Council of Australian Governments (1995). Discussion paper: A national framework for Children's Services. Canberra Australian Government Printing.
12.
DahlbergG., MossP., & PenceA. (2002). Beyond quality in early childhood education and care: Postmodern perspectives.London: Routledge Falmer.
13.
DenzinN. K., & LincolnY. S. E. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
ElliottR. (2003). Sharing care and education: Parents' perspectives. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 28(4), 14–21.
15.
FleerM. (2000). An early childhood research agenda: Voices from the field.Canberra: JS McMillan.
16.
GandiniL. (1998). Educational and caring spaces. In EdwardsC, GandiniL. & FormanG. (Eds.), The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach—advanced reflections (2nd edn) (pp. 49–97). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
17.
GlaserB. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity.Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
18.
GlaserB. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions.Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
19.
GlaserB. (2001). The grounded theory perspective: Conceptualisation contrasted with description.Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
20.
HonigA. (1998, 26–28 April). Attachment and relationships Beyond parenting. Paper presented at the Head Start Quality Network Research Satellite Conference, East Lansing, MI.
21.
JenksC. (1996). The postmodern child. In BrannenJ. & O'BrienM (Eds.) Children in families: Research and policy (pp. 13–25). London: Falmer Press.
22.
KienigA. (1999, 1–4 September). Adjustment to a new setting in the early years: How to help children in this transition. Paper presented at the 9th European Conference on the Quality of Early Childhood Education, Helsinki, Finland.
23.
MarginsonS. (1995). The economy and school policy: External environmental scan.Brisbane: Department of Education.
24.
McKimM. (1993). Quality child care: What does it mean to individual infants, parents and caregivers?Early Childhood Development and Care, 88, 23–30.
25.
McKimM. (2000). Choosing childcare for infants: Social, cultural and demographic influences and outcomes. In HaydenJ. (Ed.), Landscapes in early childhood education: Cross-national perspectives on empowerment—a guide for the new millennium (pp. 133–153). New York: Peter Lang.
26.
MossP. (2003). Getting beyond childcare: Reflections on recent policy and future possibilities. In BrannenJ. & MossP. (Eds.), Rethinking children's care (pp. 25–44). Buckingham University Press.
27.
MossP., & PetrieP. (2002). From children's services to children's spaces: Public provision, children and childhood.London: Routledge Falmer.
28.
National Childcare Accreditation Council (2002). Putting children first: Quality improvement and accreditation system handbook.Canberra: Author.
29.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2001). Starting strong: Early education and care. Report on an OECD Thematic Review. Paris: Author.
30.
PowellD. R. (1998). Reweaving parents into early childhood programs. Young Children, 53, 60–67.
31.
ProutA. (2003). Participation, policy and changing conditions of childhood. In HallettC. & ProutA. (Eds.), Hearing the voices of children: Social policy for a new century (pp. 11–25). London: Routledge Falmer.
32.
Queensland Government (1997). Queensland preschool curriculum guidelines.Brisbane: Education Queensland.
33.
Queensland Government (2000). Queensland childcare strategic plan.Brisbane: Department of Families, Youth and Community Care.
34.
Queensland Government (2002). Queensland the smart state: Education and training reforms for the future. Brisbane Department of the Premier and Cabinet.
35.
RizviF. (1995). Discourses of participation. In LimerickB. & NielsenH. (Eds.), School and community relations: Participation, policy and practice (pp. 50–64). Sydney: Harcourt, Brace & Company.
36.
RoddJ. (1996). A week in the life of a four-year-old: A study of Victorian children's patterns of usage of early childhood services. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 21(1), 37–42.
37.
RogoffB. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context.New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
RogoffB. (2003). The cultural nature of human development.New York: Oxford University Press.
39.
RuddickS. (1997). Maternal thinking. In MeyersD. (Ed.), Feminist social thought: A reader. (pp. 584–603). New York: Routledge.
40.
SmithM. K. (1994). Local education: Community, conversation, praxis.Buckingham: Open University Press.
41.
StonehouseA. (1994). Not just nice ladies: A book of readings on early childhood care and education.Sydney: Pademelon Press.
42.
VincentC., BallS., KempS., & RadcliffeP. (2002, 1–5 April). A market in love? Choice and provision in pre school child care markets in the UK. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans.
43.
WalkerK. (2004). National preschool education inquiry report: For all our children.Melbourne: Australian Education Union.
