FEW RESEARCH PROJECTS HAVE captured the voices of childcare professionals about their personal beliefs in relation to teaching and learning. Using a qualitative case study approach with an emphasis on social constructivism, this descriptive study aimed to understand beliefs and practices as part of an underlying system, rather than as separate constructs influencing each other. In this paper I argue that Fish's (1998) ‘iceberg’ of professional practice could not explain the complexity of the interplay between belief and practices. Further, I argue that, for these professionals, this interplay was closely related to the depth of belief within the individual belief system as understood by Rokeach (1968). The study indicated that Rokeach's belief system used in conjunction with Fish's ‘iceberg’ of professional practice provides a deeper understanding of how beliefs are organised within a system and how different levels of beliefs relate to practices differently.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrunerJ. S. (1996). The culture of education.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2.
CassidyD. J., & LawrenceJ. M. (2000). Teachers' beliefs: The ‘whys’ behind the ‘how tos’ in child care classrooms. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 14(2), 193–204.
3.
CharlesworthR., HartC. H., BurtsD., & HernandezS. (1991). Kindergarten teachers' beliefs and practices. Early Child Development and Care, 70, 17–35.
4.
ClarkC. M., & PetersonP. (1986). Teachers' thought processes In WittrockM. C. E. (Ed.), Research in teaching and learning: A project of the American Educational Research Association (vol. 3).New York: Macmillan.
5.
DuffyG. G. (1993). Rethinking strategy instructions: Four teachers' development and their low achievers' understandingsElementary School Journal, 93(3), 231–247.
6.
EdwardsA. (2000). Research and practice: Is there a dialogue? In PennH. (Ed.), Early childhood services: Theory, policy and practice (pp. 184–199). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
7.
EdwardsS. (2001). Early childhood educators' perceptions of developmentally appropriate interactive multimedia software Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Australian Association of Research in Education, Frankston, Melbourne.
8.
EdwardsS. (2003). ‘The curriculum is …’: Early childhood educators' conceptions of curriculum and developmentally appropriate practice: A comparative case study across two Victorian early childhood educational settings. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Monash University, Melbourne.
9.
EdwardsS. (2005). The four dimensions of curriculum: Defining curriculum from the early childhood educators' perspectiveJournal of Australian Research in Early Childhood Education, 12(2), 25–37.
10.
ErnestJ. M. (2001). An alternate approach to studying beliefs about developmentally appropriate practices. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 2(3), 337–353.
11.
FishD. (1998). Appreciating practice in the caring profession: Refocusing professional development and practitioner research.Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
12.
FleerM. (2003). Early childhood education as an evolving ‘community of practice’ or lived ‘social reproduction’ Researching the ‘taken-for-granted’. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 4(1), 64–79.
13.
GoodfellowJ., & SumsionJ. (2003). Transformative pathways in becoming an early childhood teacher. In SarachoO. N. & SpodekB. (Eds.), Studying teachers in early childhood settings (pp. 59–78). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
14.
GudmundsdōttirS. (2001). Narrative research on school practice. In RichardsonV. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th edn).Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
15.
KennedyA., & RidgwayA. (2005). ‘Catch the future’: Literacy and numeracy pathways for young children—voices from the field. Journal of Australian Research in Early Childhood Education, 12(1), 43–57.
NuttallJ. (2004) Why don't you ask someone who cares? Teacher identity, intersubjectivity and curriculum negotiation in a New Zealand childcare centre. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.
18.
PajaresM. F. (1992).Teachers' beliefs and educational research Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307–332.
19.
RathsJ. (2001). Teachers, beliefs and teaching beliefs. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 3(1).
20.
RivallandC. M. P. (2005). Beliefs and perceptions in childcare: Listening to the professionals. Unpublished honours thesis, Monash University, Melbourne.
21.
RogoffB., TurkanisC. G., & BartlettL. (2001). Learning together: Children and adults in a school community.New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
RogoffB. (2003). The cultural nature of human development.New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
RogoffB. (1998). Cognition as a collaborative process. In DamonW. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Cognition, perceptions and language (5th edn).New York: John Wiley & Sons.
24.
RogoffB. (1995). Sociocultural studies of the mind.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25.
RokeachM. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes, and values; A theory of organization and change.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26.
SmithK. E. (1997). Student teachers' beliefs about developmentally appropriate practice: Pattern, stability, and the influence of locus of control. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 12, 221–243.
27.
SniderM. H., & FuV. R. (1990). The effects of specialized education and job experience on early childhood teachers' knowledge of developmentally appropriate practice. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 5, 69–78.
28.
StraussA. L., & CorbinJ. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd edn).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
WengerE. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
WertschVJ., AlvarezA., & RioP. D. (1995). Sociocultural studies of mind.New York: Cambridge University Press.
