SOCIOCULTURAL THEORIES PROPOSE that social context and more experienced cultural members are integral to children's development and enculturation into their communities. However, the argument is made that the current Western cultural and structural arrangement of group public child care impedes the successful implementation of sociocultural-based curricula because of its individualised and separatist nature. Furthermore, accepting this current cultural and structural arrangement at the theoretical level means that we lose sight of the fact that young children want to be part of adults' lives and included in their communities. Separating young children and their teachers from adult communities also presents challenges for teachers when attempting to establish authentic relationships with young children and their families. The case is made that we need to reconceptualise theories to more closely align with contemporary enculturation practices and life situations if we are to reflect a truly sociocultural approach to teaching and learning.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnningA., CullenJ., & FleerM. (2004). Research contexts across cultures. In AnningA., CullenJ. & FleerM. (Eds.), Early childhood education: Society and culture (pp. 1–19). London: Sage.
2.
AnningA., & EdwardsA. (1999). Promoting children's learning from birth to five: Developing the new early years professional.Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
3.
AzumaH. (1994). Two modes of cognitive socialization in Japan and the United States. In GreenfieldP. M. & CockingR. R. (Eds.), Cross-cultural roots of minority child development (pp. 275–284). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
BeachB. A. (1988). Children at work: The home workplace. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 3, 209–221.
5.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
CannellaG. S. (1997). Deconstructing early childhood education: Social justice and revolution.New York: Peter Lang.
7.
CarrM. (2001). Assessment in early childhood settings: Learning stories.London: Paul Chapman.
8.
ChaiklinS. (2001). The institutionalisation of cultural-historical psychology as multinational practice. In ChaiklinS. (Ed.), The theory and practice of cultural-historical psychology (pp. 11–14). Oxford: Åarhus University Press.
9.
CullenJ. (1996). The challenge of Te Whāriki for future development in early childhood education. delta, 48(1), 113–125.
10.
CullenJ. (1999). Children's knowledge, teachers' knowledge Implications for early teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 24(2), 15–25.
11.
CullenJ. (2000). Early intervention: An inclusive approach. In FraserD., MoltzenR. & RybaK. (Eds.), Learners with special needs in Aotearoa New Zealand (2nd edn) (pp. 211–236) Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.
12.
DahlbergG., MossP., & PenceA. (2002). Beyond quality in early childhood education and care: Postmodern perspectives.London: Falmer Press.
13.
DalliC. (2002). Being an early childhood teacher: Images of professional practice and professional identity during the experience of starting childcare. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 37(1), 73–85.
14.
DencikL. (1989). Growing up in the postmodern age: On the child's situation in the modern family and the position of the family in the modern welfare state. Acta Sociologica, 32, 155–180.
15.
DencikL. (1995). Modern childhood in the Nordic countries ‘Dual socialisation’ and its implications. In ChisolmL., BuchnerP., KrugerH.-H. & du-Bois-ReymondM. (Eds.), Growing up in Europe: Contemporary horizons in childhood and youth studies (pp. 105–309). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
16.
DencikL. (1998). Modernisation—a challenge to early childhood education: Scandinavian experiences and perspectives European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 6(2), 19–33.
DonaldsonM. (1992). Human minds: An exploration. London Penguin.
19.
ElhammoumiM. (2001). Lost—or merely domesticated? The boom in socio-historiocultural theory emphasises some concepts, overlooks others. In ChaiklinS., (Ed.), The theory and practice of cultural-historical psychology (pp. 200–217). Oxford Åarhus University Press.
20.
FarquharS. E. (2003). Quality teaching: Early foundations best evidence synthesis.Wellington: Ministry of Education.
21.
FleerM. (1992). From Piaget to Vygotsky: Moving into a new era of early childhood education. In LambertB. (Ed.), The changing face of early childhood (pp. 134–149). Canberra Australian Early Childhood Association.
22.
FleerM. (1995). DAPcentrism: Challenging developmental appropriate practice.Canberra: Australian Early Childhood Association.
23.
FleerM. (2001a, April). Early childhood education as a ‘community of practice’ or as lived ‘social reproduction’? Draft paper presented at the Teacher Refresher Course, Mathematics and literacy in early childhood, Massey University, New Zealand.
24.
FleerM. (2001b, April). Sociocultural assessment in early childhood education—myth or reality? Keynote paper presented at the Teacher Refresher Course, Mathematics and literacy in early childhood, Massey University, New Zealand.
25.
FleerM. (2003). Post-Vygotskian lenses on Western early childhood education: Moving the debate forward. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 11(1), 55–67.
26.
GöncüA. (1999). Children's and researchers' engagement in the world. In GöncüA. (Ed.), Children's engagement in the sociocultural world. Sociocultural perspectives (pp. 3–24) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
GraueE., & WalshD. (1998). Studying children in context: Theories, methods and ethics.London: Sage.
28.
HedgesH. (2000). Teaching in early childhood: Time to merge constructivist views so learning through play equals teaching through play. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 25(4), 16–21.
29.
JacksonC. (1993). Doing what comes naturally? Women and environment in development. World Development, 21(12), 1947–1963.
30.
JordanB. (1999). Dialogues and projects: Extending young children's thinking. Early Education Folio 4, 3–7.
31.
JordanB. (2003). Professional development making a difference for young children: Co-constructing understandings in early childhood centres. Unpublished doctorate thesis, Massey University, Palmerston North.
LeavittR. L. (1994). Power and emotion in infant-toddler day care.Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
34.
Leont'evA. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness and personality.Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
35.
LindforsJ. W. (1999). Children's inquiry: Using language to make sense of the world.New York: Teachers College Columbia University.
36.
LoflandJ., & LoflandL. H. (1995). Analyzing social settings: A qualitative guide to observation and analysis.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
37.
MarxK. (1983). Theses on Feuerbach. In KamenkaE. (Ed.), The portable Karl Marx (pp. 155–158). New York: Penguin.
38.
MayH. (2003). Concerning women considering children: Battles of the Childcare Association 1963–2003. Wellington New Zealand Childcare Association.
39.
Ministry of Education (2002). Pathways to the future: Nga huarahi arataki. A 10-year strategic plan for early childhood education.Wellington: Learning Media.
40.
Ministry of Education (2004). Kei tua o te pae. Assessment for learning: Early childhood exemplars.Wellington: Learning Media.
41.
MollL. (1990). Vygotsky and education.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
MorelliG., RogoffB., & AngelilloC. (2003). Cultural variation in children's access to work or involvement in specialized child-focused activities. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27, 264–274.
43.
McLeodL. S. (2002). Leadership and management in early childhood centres: A qualitative case study. Unpublished doctorate thesis, Massey University, Palmerston North.
44.
NicolopolouA., & ColeM. (1993). The Fifth Dimension, its playworld and its institutional contexts: The generation and transmission of shared knowledge in the culture of collaborative learning. In FormanE. A., MinnickN. & StoneC. A. (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Socio-cultural dynamics in children's development (pp. 283–314). New York: Oxford University Press.
45.
NuttallJ. (2002). Negotiating the meaning of curriculum—can we awaken the ‘sleeping beauty’?Early Education, 28, 5–9.
46.
NuttallJ. (2003). Early childhood curriculum in theory, ideology and practice: Using Te Whāriki. delta, 54(1/2), 91–104.
47.
PalinscarA., BrownA., & CampioneJ. (1993). First-grade dialogues for knowledge acquisition and use. In FormanE. A., MinickN. & StoneC. A., (Eds.), Contexts for learning (pp. 43–57). New York: Oxford University Press.
48.
PodmoreV. N., MayH., & MaraD. L. (1998). Evaluating early childhood programmes using the strands and goals of Te Whāriki: Final report on phases one and two to the Ministry of Education.Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
49.
RatnerC. (2000). A cultural-psychological analysis of emotions Culture and Psychology, 6, 5–39.
RheingoldH. L. (1982). Little children's participation in the work of adults, a nascent prosocial behaviour. Child Development, 53, 114–125.
52.
RitchieJ. (2003). Te Whāriki as a potential lever for bicultural development. In NuttallJ. (Ed.), Weaving Te Whāriki: Aotearoa-New Zealand's early childhood curriculum document in theory and practice (pp. 79–109). Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
53.
RogoffB. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context.New York: Oxford University Press.
54.
RogoffB. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation and apprenticeship. In WertschW. J., PabloR. D. & AmeliaA. (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139–164). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55.
RogoffB. (1998). Cognition as a collaborative process. In DamonW. (Chief Ed.), KuhnD. & SieglerR. S. (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology—Vol. 2: Cognition, perceptions and language (5th edn) (pp. 679–744). New York: John Wiley.
56.
RogoffB. (2003). The cultural nature of human development.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57.
SingerE. (1996). Children, parents and caregivers: Three views of care and education. In HujalaE., (Eds.), Childhood education: International perspectives (pp.159–170). Oulu, Finland: Finland Association of Childhood Education International.
58.
SmithA. B. (1996). The early childhood curriculum from a sociocultural perspective. Early Child Development and Care, 115, 51–64.
59.
SmithA. (1998). Understanding children's development: A New Zealand perspective (4th edn).Wellington: Bridget Williams Books.
60.
SmithA. B., GrimaB., GaffneyM., PowellK., MasseL., & BarnettS. (2000). Strategic research initiative literature review: Early childhood education.Wellington: Ministry of Education.
61.
SommerD. (1992, October). Children's living conditions: Secular changes and childhood mythology. Educare in Europe Report of the UNESCO Conference held in Denmark.
62.
StoneC. A. (1993). What is missing in the metaphor of scaffolding? In FormanE. A., MinickN. & StoneC. A. (Eds.), Contexts for learning (pp. 169–183). New York: Oxford University Press.
63.
Te OneS. (2003). The context for Te Whāriki: Contemporary issues of influence. In NuttallJ. (Ed.), Weaving Te Whāriki Aotearoa New Zealand's early childhood curriculum document in theory and practice (pp. 17–49). Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
64.
TolmanC. (2001). The origins of activity as a category in the philosophies of Kant, Fichte, Hegel and Marx. In ChaiklinS. (Ed.), The theory and practice of cultural-historical psychology (pp. 84–92). Oxford: Åarhus University Press.
