While early childhood professionals in NSW are accountable to a substantial collection of regulatory requirements, little research has explored the outcomes of this regulatory environment, both intended and otherwise. This paper presents findings from a NSW study and shows how early childhood professionals working in long day care centres perceive the regulatory environment to impact on their professional practice. Specific attention is given to the impact of the national Quality Improvement and Accreditation System and the NSW Children's Services Regulation. The notion of the regulatory environment as a ‘double-edged sword’ emerges as a useful conceptual metaphor to understand how early childhood professionals perceive these regulatory frameworks to impact on their practice. Findings show that the benefits afforded by accreditation and the Regulation are offset by unfulfilled intentions and unintended outcomes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AshbyG., & GrieshaberS. (1996). Culture and early childhood curriculum in Australia. Early Child Development and Care, 123, 127–141.
2.
BownK. (2005). Voices from the other side of the fence: Teachers' experiences with the Regulation. Unpublished Hons thesis, Macquarie University, Sydney.
3.
BoydB. J., & SchneiderN. (1997). Perceptions of the work environment and burnout in Canadian child care providers. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 11(2), 171–180.
4.
BryceQ., & JohnsonP. (1995). Quality Improvement and Accreditation System two years on. Every Child, 5(1), 4–5.
5.
Commonwealth of Australia (2004). The national agenda for early childhood: A draft framework.Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
6.
DawsonS. (2004). Children's services regulation 2004. Sydney: NSW Department of Community Services.
ElyM., VinzR., AnzulM., & DowningM. (1997). On writing qualitative research: Living by words.London: Falmer Press.
9.
FisherK., & PatulnyR. (2004). Impact of staff ratios on under 2 year olds in children's services. Sydney: Social Policy Research Centre.
10.
FroweI. (2005). Professional trust. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53(1), 34–53.
11.
GoelmanH., DohertyG., LeroD., LaGrangeA., & TougasJ. (2000). You bet I care! Caring and learning environments: Quality in child care centres across Canada.Ontario: Centre for Families, Work and Well-Being, University of Guelph.
12.
GoodfellowJ. (2001). Wise practice: The need to move beyond best practice in early childhood education. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 26(3), 1–6.
13.
GoodfellowJ. (2003). Practical wisdom in professional practice: The person in the process. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 4(1), 48–63.
14.
GrieshaberS. (2000). Regulating the early childhood field. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 25(2), 1–6.
15.
GrieshaberS. (2002). A national system of childcare accreditation: Quality assurance or a technique of normalization? In CannellaG. S. & KincheloeJ. L. (Eds.), Kidworld: Childhood studies, global perspectives and education (pp. 161–180). New York: Peter Lang.
16.
GrieshaberS., HalliwellG., HatchJ. A., & WalshK. (2000). Child observation as teachers' work in contemporary Australian early childhood programmes. International Journal of Early Years Education, 8(1), 41–55.
17.
HatchJ. A., & GrieshaberS. (2002). Child observation and accountability in early childhood education: Perspectives from Australia and the United States. Early Childhood Education Journal, 29(4), 227–231.
18.
HollanderJ. A. (2004). The social contexts of focus groups. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 33(5), 602–637.
19.
JacksonE. L. (1996). Work conditions in long day care in the era of accreditation. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 21(2), 17–20.
20.
LyonsM. (1996). Who cares? Child-care, trade unions and staff turnover. Journal of Industrial Relations, 38(4), 629–647.
21.
LyonsM. (1997). Work rewards, job satisfaction and accreditation in long day care. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 22(3), 40–44.
22.
LyonsM. (2003). The work organisation in Australian daycare centres: Professionalism or exploitation? Retrieved 2 July 2004, www.informit.com.au/library/.
23.
MacNaughtonG. (2005). Doing Foucault in early childhood studies: Applying post-structuralist ideas.New York: Routledge Falmer.
24.
MallettL. (2005, 15 September). Children's Services Regulation 2004. Letter sent to children's services from the NSW Department of Community Services.
25.
MurrayS. (1996). Evaluating the evaluation of child care accreditation. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 21(2), 12–16.
26.
National Childcare Accreditation Council (2005a). Quality Improvement and Accreditation System handbook.Sydney: Author.
27.
National Childcare Accreditation Council (2005b). Reclassified QIAS update. Putting Children First, 14(June), 1.
28.
NSW Department of Community Services (2002). Draft Children's Services Regulation 2002 under the Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998.
29.
NSW Department of Community Services (2004). Children's Services Regulation under the Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998.
30.
PressF., & HayesA. (2000). OECD thematic review of early childhood education and care policy. Canberra: Commonwealth Government of Australia.
31.
PriceWaterhouseCoopers (2002). NSW Department of Community Services: Children's Services Regulation 2002. Regulatory Impact Statement. Final Report.Sydney: Author.
32.
PriceWaterhouseCoopers (2003). Draft children's services regulation: An evaluation of potential benefits and costs. Sydney: Author.
33.
PurcalC., & FisherK. (2004). Review of the early childhood teachers shortage interim policy. Sydney: Social Policy Research Centre.
34.
QueraltM., & WitteA. (1999). Childcare regulations: A method to pursue social welfare goals?Children and Youth Services Review, 21(2), 111–146.
35.
ShepherdW. (2004). Children's services: Dangerous places for children?Rattler, 69(Autumn), 23–26.
36.
WarrilowP., FisherK., CummingsK., SumsionJ., & a'BeckettC. (2002). Early childhood teachers and qualified staff. Sydney: Social Policy Research Centre.
37.
WhitebookM., SakaiL., & HowesC. (2004). Improving and sustaining center quality: The role of NAEYC accreditation and staff stability. Early Education and Development, 15(3), 305–325.
