Learning stories, a form of narrative assessment, were used by teams surrounding two New Zealand children with high and complex needs. Learning stories are currently used by New Zealand early childhood teachers and highlight strengths- and interest-based learning in natural settings. This contrasts with specialists' assessments, which highlight decontextualised developmental skills. Team members including parents, teachers, support workers, health and education professionals received professional development on the use of learning story assessment and shared their stories at individual planning meetings. Goals for the children were collaboratively developed, drawing upon the different perspectives team members brought to the interpretation of learning stories. The project highlighted the empowerment of parents and educators and the strengthening of collaborative relationships. The approach accommodated the many perspectives held by individuals within the teams and successfully harmonised the skills- and strength-based assessment models. Challenges to the adoption of narrative methodologies in inclusive early intervention contexts were identified.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BourkeR., Bevan-BrownJ., Carroll-LindJ., CullenJ.KearneyA., MentisM., PoskittJ., ProchnowJ., WardA, O'NeillJ., McAlpineD., Bevan-BrownW., GrantS., & MortonM. (2002). Special education 2000: Monitoring and evaluation of the policy. Final report to Ministry of Education. IPDER, Massey University.
2.
BruderM. B. (2002). Family-centered early intervention: Expanding learning opportunities in the home and community Paper presented at the Australian Early Intervention Conference, Hobart.
3.
BuysseV, WesleyP., & Able-BooneH. (2001). Innovations in professional development. In GuralnickM. (Ed.), Early childhood inclusion: Focus on change (pp. 179–200). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
4.
CarrM. (2001). Assessment in early childhood settings: Learning stories.London: Paul Chapman.
5.
CarrM., & DowsonG. (1995). Te Whāriki: Inclusion and assessment. Proceedings of the Sixth Early Childhood Convention Conference (pp. 89–100), Auckland.
6.
CarrM., HatherlyA., LeeW., & RamseyK. (2003). Te Whāriki and assessment: A case study of teacher change. In NuttallJ. (Ed.), Weaving Te Whāriki: Aotearoa New Zealand's early childhood curriculum in theory and practice (pp. 187–214). Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
7.
Carroll-LindJ., & CullenJ. (2003). Including parents: Getting it right together?New Zealand Research in Early Childhood Education, 6, 83–98.
8.
CullenJ. (1993). Why retain a developmental focus in early education. In MellorE. & CoombeK. (Eds.), Issues in early childhood services: Australian perspectives (pp. 53–64). Dubuque, IO:Wm. C. Brown.
9.
CullenJ. (2002). Discourse, policy and practice: An inclusive approach to early intervention. Delta: Policy and Practice in Education, 54(1/2), 133–148.
10.
CullenJ. (2004). Adults co-constructing professional knowledge. In AnningA., CullenJ. & FleerM. (Eds.), Early childhood education: Society and culture (pp. 69–79). London: Sage.
11.
CullenJ., & Bevan-BrownJ. (1999). Resourcing special education in early childhood: Database and best practice validation. Final report to Ministry of Education. IPDER, Massey University.
12.
DinnebeilL., HaleL., & RuleS. (1999). Early intervention program practices that support collaboration. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 19(4), 225–235.
13.
DunnL., BilbeK., MooreE., SeavillJ., WraggeO., AngellK., BurtE., & Li CalsiA. (1998). A social skills training programme for education support workers: Teaching social skills to young children with disabilities. Paper presented at Specialist Education Services Conference, Auckland.
14.
DunnL. (2000). Using ‘Learning Stories’ to assess and design programmes for young children with special needs in New Zealand. Infants and Young Children, 13(2), 73–82.
15.
DunnL. (2002). Children with special rights. Early Education, 30, 17–22.
16.
DunstC., TrivetteC., HumphriesT., RaabM., & RoperN. (2001). Contrasting approaches to natural learning environment interventions. Infants and Young Children, 14(2), 48–63.
17.
FleerM. (1995). Challenging developmentally appropriate practice: An introduction. In FleerM. (Ed.), DAPcentrism: Challenging developmentally appropriate practice (pp. 2–9). Canberra: Australian Early Childhood Association.
18.
Grenot-ScheyerM., SchwartzI., & MeyerL. (1998). Blending best practices for young children: Inclusive early childhood programs. Every Child, 4(2), 4–5.
KempC., & HayesA. (2004). Early intervention in Australia: The challenge of systems implementation. In GuralnickM. (Ed.), The developmental system approach to early intervention (pp. 401–423). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
21.
KilgallonP., & MaloneyC. (2003). Early childhood teachers' knowledge of teaching children with disabilities. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 28(4), 9–13.
22.
LepperC., WilliamsonD., & CullenJ. (2003). Professional development to support collaborative assessment. Early Education, 33, 19–28.
23.
LlewellynG., ThompsonK., & FanteM. (2002). Inclusion in early childhood services: Ongoing challenges. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 27(3), 18–23.
24.
LosardoA., & Notari-SyversonA. (2001). Alternative approaches to assessing young children.Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
25.
MacArthurJ., PurdueK. & BallardK. (2003). Competent and confident children? Te Whāriki and the inclusion of children with disabilities in early childhood education. In NuttallJ. (Ed.), Weaving Te Whāriki (pp. 131–160). Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
26.
McCartneyE. (1999). Barriers to collaboration: An analysis of systemic barriers to collaboration between teachers and speech and language therapists. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 34(4), 431–440.
27.
McWilliamR. (1995). Integration of therapy and consultative special education: A continuum in early intervention. Infants and Young Children, 7(4), 29–38.
28.
Ministry of Education (1996). Te Whāriki he whāriki maatauranga mo nga mokupuna o Aotearoa.Early childhood curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.
29.
Ministry of Education (2000). Including everyone te reo taataki.Wellington: Learning Media.
30.
Ministry of Education (2001). Integrated effective service provision for children and young people with physical disabilities.Wellington: Learning Media.
31.
Ministry of Education (2002). Pathways to the future: Ngaa huarahi arataki.Wellington: Learning Media.
32.
Ministry of Education (2004). Standards for providers of early intervention services (early childhood sector). Wellington: Learning Media.
33.
RobbinsJ. (2003). The more he looked inside the more piglet wasn't there: What adopting a sociocultural perspective can help us see. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 28(1), 24–30.
34.
SunderlandL. (2004). Speech, language, and audiology services in public schools. Intervention in School and Clinic, 39(4), 209–217.
35.
Victorian Government Department of Human Services (2003). Early childhood intervention services vision and key priorities.Melbourne: Author.
36.
WheldallK., & KempC. (1996). What is so different about the new early intervention network at Macquarie University Special Education Centre?Special Education Perspectives, 5, 29–32.
37.
WilksA. (2002, July). A strength focus: Supporting children's learning. Paper presented at the Ninth International Learning Conference, Beijing.
38.
WoleryM. (1996). Early childhood special and general education. In McWilliamR. (Ed.), Rethinking pull-out services in early intervention: A professional resource (pp.185–215). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
