This article explores possibilities for linking children, families and early childhood settings through processes that celebrate and document the richness of children's daily realities. Changing images of the child, greater recognition of the child in social contexts of the family, community and the early childhood setting, as well as the dynamic nature of early childhood services have contributed to innovative approaches to curriculum and documentation. New ways of thinking about children and planning affirm children's competencies and celebrate their learning. Effective learning communities involve the collaboration of children and families in all stages of documentation and decision-making.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BlochM. (1992). Critical perspectives on the historical relationship between child development and early childhood education research. In KesslerS., & SwadenerB. B. (Eds), Reconceptualising the early childhood curriculum: Beginning the dialogue (pp. 3–20). New York: Teachers College Press.
2.
BlockA. (1997). I'm only bleeding: Education as the practice of violence against children.New York: Peter Lang.
3.
CanellaG. S. (1997). Deconstructing early childhood education: Social justice and revolution. New York: Peter Lang
4.
ComberB. (1997). The problem of ‘background’ in researching the student subject. Association for Australian Research in Education Conference, Brisbane.
5.
DahlbergG., MossP., & PenceA. (1999). Beyond quality and care in early childhood education: Post modern perspectives.London: Falmer Press.
6.
Department of Community Services (2002). The NSW curriculum framework: The practice of relationships.Sydney.
7.
EdwardsC., GandiniL., & FormanG. (1998). The hundred languages of children (2nd edn). Greenwich; Connecticut: Ablex.
8.
FleetA., & PattersonC. (1998). Beyond the boxes: Planning for real knowledge and live children. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 23(4), 31–35.
9.
HelmJ., BenekeS., & SteinheimerK. (1998). Windows on learning: Documenting young children's work.New York: Teachers College Press.
10.
HelmJ., & KatzL. (2001). Young investigators: The project approach in the early years. New York: Teachers College Press.
11.
HughesP., & MacNaughtonG. (2000). Consensus, dissensus or community: The politics of parent involvement in early childhood education. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 1 (3), 241–258.
12.
JonesE., & NimmoJ. (1994). Emergent curriculum. Washington DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
13.
Jones DiazC., BeecherB., ArthurL., AshtonJ., HaydenJ., MakinL., McNaughtM., & ClugstonL. (2001). Literacies, communities and under 5s. Sydney: Department of Community Services and Department of Education and Training.
MalaguzziL. (1998). History, ideas and basic philosophy - an interview with Lela Gandini. In EdwardsC., GandiniL & FormanG. (Eds.). The hundred languages of children (pp.49–97). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
16.
SilinJ. G. (1995). Sex, death, and the education of children: Our passion for ignorance in the age of AIDS. New York: Teachers College Press.
17.
TinworthS. (1997). Whose good idea was it? Child initiated curriculum. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 22(3) 24–29.
18.
VygotskyL. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
