This paper discusses the findings of research which is examining the nature of the values embodied or intended in the Australian Early Childhood Associations Code of Ethics (1990). In order to determine the nature of these values a meta-ethical analysis is adopted. Philosophical discourse on values in Australian early childhood education needs to be asserted in the face of current discourses where values are considered to be relative, or where education is considered to be a value-free or neutral activity. This discussion should be grounded in an understanding of the nature of the values which underpin early childhood education in Australia.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AspinD. (1999). The nature of values and their place and promotion in schemes of values education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 31(2), 123–143.
2.
Australian Early Childhood Association (1990). Code of ethics.Canberra: Australian Early Childhood Association.
3.
BeauchampT. & ChildressJ. (1994). Principles of biomedical ethics. 4th edn. New York: Oxford University Press.
4.
CoadyC. A. J. (1996). On regulating ethics. In CoadyM. and BlochS. (Eds.). Codes of ethics and the professions.Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
5.
CoadyM. (1996). The moral domain of professionals. In M. Coady and S. Bloch (Eds.). Codes of ethics and the professions.Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
6.
CoadyM. (1994). Ethical issues for early childhood practitioners. In MellorE. and CoombeK. (Eds.). Issues in early childhood education.Dubuque, Iowa: WCB.
7.
CoadyM. (1991). Ethics, laws and codes. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 16(1), 17–20.
8.
CoombeK., & NewmanL. (1997). Ethics in early childhood field experiences. Journal of Australian Research in Early Childhood Education, 1, 1–9.
9.
ElliotR., & HattonE. (1998). Neutrality and the value-ladeness of teaching. In HattonE. (Ed.). 2nd edn. Understanding teaching.Sydney: Harcourt Brace.
10.
FleerM., & KennedyA. (2000). Quality assurance: Whose quality and whose assurance?New Zealand Research in Early Childhood Education, 3, 13–27.
11.
KennedyA. (In press). Early childhood education: A moral concern. Doctoral thesis in progress, Monash University, Melbourne.
12.
KaganD., & SmithK. (1988). Beliefs and behaviours of kindergarten teachers. Educational Research, 30, 26–35.
13.
LichtenbergJ. (1996). What are codes of ethics for? In CoadyM. and BlochS. (Eds.) Codes of ethics and the professions.Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
14.
PajaresF. M. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.
15.
PollnitzL. (1997). An enforceable code of ethics: Who needs it?Journal of Australian Research in Early Childhood Education.1, 81–90.
16.
SigginsI. (1996). Professional codes: Some historical antecedents. In M. Coady and S. Bloch (eds.). Codes of ethics and the professions.Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
17.
SmallR. (1998). Critical dialogue: Towards an unprincipled ethics of educational research. Australian Journal of Education, 42(1), 103–124.
18.
SockettH. (1993). The moral base for teacher professionalism.New York: Teachers College Press.
19.
StipekD., & BylerP. (1997). Early childhood education teachers: Do they practice what they preach?Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 12, 305–325.
20.
StonehouseA., & CreaserB. (1991). A code of ethics for the Australian early childhood profession: Background and overview. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 16(1), 7–10.
21.
TriggR. (1973). Reason and commitment.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
United Nations (1959). The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of the Child.
23.
United Nations (1989). United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.
24.
WoodrowC. (1999). Revisiting images of the child in early childhood education: Reflections and considerations. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 24(4), 7–12.
