Clinical data for all current outpatients at a large tertiary hospital has been collected for analysis. Patient diagnoses for selected “key” clinics have been coded to ICD-9-CM standards. Methods to reduce the volume of coding required for such data collection are discussed, and include short-lists of codes, default assignment of diagnoses codes according to the nature of visit, and producing a “discharge” summary for outpatients, similar to that routinely produced for inpatients.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ambulatory Sub-committee of the Australian Casemix Clinic Committee Report (1995), Progress Towards Ambulatory Casemix Classification, Report by Casemix Branch 29 August, 1995.
2.
ClearyMIAshbyRHJelinekALagaidaR, (1994). The Future of Casemix in Emergency Medicine and Ambulatory Care, The Medical Journal of Australia, 161(Suppl 5), S30–S33.
3.
GoldM, (1988). Common Sense on Extending DRG Concepts to Pay for Ambulatory Care. Inquiry, 25, 281–289.
4.
MichaelRPiperKHeardP, (1992). Ambulatory Encounters Project, Report to the Commonwealth Department of Health, Housing and Community Services: September 1992.