Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A large retrospective recoding study of 4000 records was conducted in a group comprising three large Sydney teaching hospitals. The aim of the study was to identify the specific errors and problems relating to medical record documentation and coding. This paper describes in detail the sampling, methodology and analysis of results. The study revealed an error rate of 47% (all diagnoses and procedures were included) and a change in DRG assignment of 9.25%. Inconsistent/unclear documentation accounted for the greatest percentage of the errors. In 63.3% of the cases the change in DRG assignment following correction of errors was favourable financially for the hospitals. The conclusion drawn is that ensuring consistency in coding practices and policies is one of the major issues facing the medical record profession.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aas

I.H.M.

(1987). Quality of hospital data and DRGs. Trondheim, June, 1987.

Barnard

Esmond

(1981). DRG based reimbursement: The use of concurrent and retrospective clinical data. Medical care, 19, 1071–1082.

Bindman

A.B.

Eichenfield

L.F.

Geller

S.A.

(1984). Diagnosis Related Groups: Physician and abstractor reliability and financial significance of errors. The Mt. Sinai Journal of Medicine, 51, 237–245.

Butts

M.S.

Williams

D.R.R.

(1982). Accuracy of Hospital Activity Analysis data. British Medical Journal, 185, 506–507.

Connell

F.A.

Blide

L.A.

Hanken

M.A.

(1984). Ambiguities in the selection of the principal diagnosis: Impact on data quality, hospital statistics and DRGs. Journal of the American Medical Record Association, 55/2, 18–23.

Currie

M.S.

(1985). Clinical data quality: Impact on revenue. Journal of the American Medical Record Association, 56/4, 25–27.

Demlo

L.K.

Campbell

P.M.

(1981). Improving hospital discharge data: Lessons from the National Hospital Discharge Survey. Medical Care, 19, 1030–1040.

Doremus

H.D.

Michenzi

E.M.

(1983). Data quality: An illustration of its potential impact upon a Diagnosis Related Group's casemix index and reimbursement. Medical Care, 21, 1001–1011.

Hsia

D.C.

Krushat

W.M.

Fagan

A.B.

Tebbutt

M.S.

Kusserow

R.P.

(1988). Accuracy of diagnostic coding for Medicare patients under the prospective-payment system. New England Journal of Medicine, 318, 352–355.

10.

Institute of Medicine (1977a). Reliability of hospital discharge abstracts. Washington: National Academy of Sciences.

11.

Institute of Medicine (1977b). Reliability of Medicare hospital discharge records. Washington: National Academy of Sciences.

12.

Johnson

A.N.

Appel

G.L.

(1984). DRGs and hospital case records: Implications for Medicare case mix accuracy. Inquiry, 21, 128–134.

13.

Lloyd

S.S.

Rissing

J.P.

(1985). Physician and coding errors in patient records. Journal of the American Medical Record Association, 254, 1330–1336.

14.

Martini

C.J.M.

Hughes

A.O.

Patton

V.A.

(1976). A study of the validity of the Hospital Activity Analysis Information. British Journal of Preventive Social Medicine, 30, 180–186.

15.

Reid

B.A.

(1991). The Effect of Coding on the Allocation of DRGs. Sydney: Australian Studies in Health Service Administration.

16.

Watson

P.J.

Gough

T.L.

(1991). The status of ICD-9-CM coding in NSW and ACT hospitals. Sydney: School of Health Information Management, The University of Sydney.

The Prevalence and Cost of Documentation and Coding Errors

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References