CowenE.L.SpinellA.HightowerA.D.LotyczewskiB.S. (1987). Author reactions to the manuscript revision process. American Psychologist, 42: 403–405.
2.
CrandallR. (1977) How qualified are editors?American Psychologist, 32: 578–579.
3.
CrandallR. (1987) We need research on what constitutes good journal papers – and good editing – not guesswork on how to improve manuscripts!American Psychologist, 42: 407–408.
4.
CusickA. (1987) Guest Editorial: Research – production, publication, and practice or perish?Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 34: 85–88.
5.
CusickA. (1988) Editorial: The journal editorial process – how well does it work?Australian Occupational Therapy Journal. (In press).
6.
HayesC. (1984) “Up to now” in ToddS. (ed) Women and theatre calling the shots. London: Faber and Faber, pp. 75–81.
7.
LindseyD. (1976). Distinction, achievement and editorial board membership. American Psychologist, 31: 799–804.
8.
MadillH. (1987). Letter to the Editor: Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 34(2): 74.
9.
OttenbacherK.HasselkusB.R. (1988). Editorial. Research and Practice: An evolving synthesis. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 8: 67–74.
10.
RodmanH. (1970). The moral responsibility of journal editors and referees. American Sociologist, 5: 351–357.